| Literature DB >> 26445531 |
Yinglan Su1, Zhongjun Zhang1, Yaoxian Zhang1, Hanwei Li1, Wei Shi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of different concentrations of ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia with regard to postoperative analgesic and patient's satisfaction in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty in the People's Republic of China.Entities:
Keywords: analgesic effect; inguinal hernioplasty; ropivacaine; ultrasound guided ilioinguinal nerve block
Year: 2015 PMID: 26445531 PMCID: PMC4590637 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S93276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence ISSN: 1177-889X Impact factor: 2.711
Demographic and physical features of participants in groups
| Groups | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, n (%) | |||
| Male | 15 (75) | 15 (75) | 16 (80) |
| Female | 5 (25) | 5 (25) | 4 (20) |
| ASA, n (%) | |||
| I | 8 (40) | 7 (35) | 7 (35) |
| II | 12 (60) | 13 (65) | 13 (65) |
| Age (years) | 79.90±3.04 | 80.10±2.83 | 80.15±2.90 |
Abbreviation: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Clinical features and circulatory monitoring of participants in groups
| Groups | A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onset time | 24.50±3.00 | 19.25±2.20 | 14.75±1.45 | 10−3 |
| Requirement of tramadol (mg) | 50.00±36.27 | 2.50±11.18 (n=1, 50 mg each) | 0 | 10−3 |
| Requirement of fentanyl (mg) | 0.005±0.15 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 |
| Arterial pressure | ||||
| Before operation | 81.90±4.38 | 82.25±3.42 | 81.30±3.13 | 0.713 |
| 5 minutes after operation started | 84.50±4.73 | 81.20±3.33 | 79.35±3.13 | |
| During hernia sac separation | 85.15±4.93 | 80.35±2.98 | 79.80±3.53 | |
| Postoperation | 81.75±4.15 | 82.10±3.21 | 81.15±2.96 | 0.685 |
| Heart rate | ||||
| Before operation | 68.55±4.85 | 68.40±4.92 | 68.55±4.78 | 0.994 |
| 5 minutes after operation started | 76.00±6.10 | 68.55±4.48 | 68.75±3.99 | 10−3 |
| During hernia sac separation | 73.75±5.54 | 68.85±4.30 | 68.20±4.25 | 0.001 |
| Postoperation | 69.10±4.01 | 68.45±4.70 | 68.45±4.36 | 0.863 |
Notes:
P<0.05 when compared with low-dose group B;
P>0.05 when compared with group B. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation
Figure 1Satisfactory and VAS score in study subjects.
Notes: (A) VAS scores of participants 12 hours after the operations in study subjects. (B) Satisfactory scores of participants 12 hours after the operations in study subjects. (C) Satisfactory scores of participants with or without abnormal skin sensation. N denotes patients with no abnormal skin sensation, Y denotes patients with abnormal skin sensation. (D) Reversed correlation of satisfactory score and VAS score. The scores from 60 patients were plotted where satisfactory score were analyzed as dependent variable and VAS score were considered as independent variable, P=0.001. Each diamond shaped plot stands for patient(s) that gave such score. Satisfactory levels are measured as 5=most satisfied and 0=not satisfied.
Abbreviation: VAS, Visual Analog Scale.