Literature DB >> 26445265

Karyotype analysis with amniotic fluid in 12365 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis and strategies of prenatal diagnosis.

H Xiao1, Y L Yang1, C Y Zhang1, E J Liao1, H R Zhao1, S X Liao1.   

Abstract

We explored the strategies of prenatal diagnosis by foetal karyotype analysis in pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis. Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid was performed on 12365 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis. The detection rates and distributions of abnormal karyotypes were observed in a variety of indications for genetic amniocentesis. The detection rates of abnormal karyotype were 57.4% in either a mother or father with chromosomal abnormality, 8.5% in the pregnant women with pathological ultrasound finding (PUF), 2.79% in the pregnant women with advanced age (35 years and over) and 2.23% in the women with abnormal maternal serum screening (MSS) tests. Foetal abnormal karyotype was found in 86 pregnant women with PUF; of the 86 pregnant women, 42 had trisomy 13, 18 or 21. Of the 12365 pregnant women, foetal abnormal karyotype was found in 428 (3.46%); of the 428 foetuses, only 154 had trisomy 13, 18 or 21. In the pregnant women with abnormal MSS, 111 foetuses had abnormal karyotype, but only 36 foetuses had trisomy 13, 18 or 21. We conclude that (1) ultrasound is an important approach to prevent the birth of foetuses with chromosomal disease. (2) Non-invasive prenatal DNA detection cannot completely replace invasive prenatal diagnosis and MSS. (3) The strategies of prenatal diagnosis: Genetic amniocentesis is strongly recommended for the pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis. For pregnant women who refuse invasive prenatal diagnosis, non-invasive prenatal DNA detection is first performed. If the results of non-invasive prenatal DNA detection are negative, the pregnant women are followed up by ultrasound; if the results of non-invasive prenatal DNA detection are positive, the pregnant women should undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniocentesis; chromosome abnormality; prenatal diagnosis; trisomy 21

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26445265     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1041889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effect of advanced parental age on pregnancy outcome and offspring health.

Authors:  Cong Zhang; Liying Yan; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  The de novo aberration rate of prenatal karyotype was comparable between 1496 fetuses conceived via IVF/ICSI and 1396 fetuses from natural conception.

Authors:  Shimin Yuan; Liuliang Guo; Dehua Cheng; Xiurong Li; Hao Hu; Liang Hu; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin; Fei Gong; Yue-Qiu Tan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of rearrangements in the fetal 22q11.2 region.

Authors:  Suping Li; Yuxia Jin; Jing Yang; Li Yang; Ping Tang; Chiyan Zhou; Liping Wu; Jinhua Dong; Jie Chen; Huaxiang Shen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  The assessment of combined karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray in pregnant women of advanced maternal age: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ye Shi; Jun Ma; Ying Xue; Jing Wang; Bin Yu; Ting Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

5.  In-house genetic counseling increases the detection of abnormal karyotypes-a 26-year experience in prenatal diagnosis in a single tertiary referral hospital in Poland.

Authors:  Julia Bijok; Anna Kucińska-Chahwan; Diana Massalska; Alicja Ilnicka; Grzegorz Panek; Tomasz Roszkowski
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and report of chromosomal abnormalities in 15,401 cases of Iranian women.

Authors:  Sarang Younesi; Mohammad Mahdi Taheri Amin; Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh; Pourandokht Saadati; Soudabeh Jamali; Mohammad-Hossein Modarressi; Shahram Savad; Saeed Delshad; Saloomeh Amidi; Taraneh Geranorimi; Fariba Navidpour; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Analysis of autosomal dominant genes impacted by copy number loss in 24,844 fetuses without structural abnormalities.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Li Wang; Daishu Yin; Feng Tang; Yang Zeng; Hongmei Zhu; Jing Wang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  20-year experience on prenatal diagnosis in a reference university medical genetics center in Turkey

Authors:  Burak Durmaz; Hilmi Bolat; Zehra Cengisiz; Fuat Akercan; Tuba Sözen Türk; Erhan Parıltay; Aslı Ece Solmaz; Mert Kazandı; Emin Karaca; Asude Durmaz; Ayça Aykut; Sermet Sağol; Haluk Akın; Ferda Özkınay; ÖzgÜr Çoğulu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.