Sohit Karol1,2, Michelle M Robertson1. 1. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA. 2. Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sedentary work is associated with many adverse health outcomes, and sit-stand workstations in offices have emerged as a way to counteract sedentary work. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the existing knowledge on sit-stand workstations, treadmill workstations and bicycle workstations. METHODS: The inclusion/exclusion criteria were: 1) empirical research examining the effectiveness of sit-stand workstations in lab or field studies, 2) working adult population, 3) sit-stand workstation interventions where workers performed the same task from a seated or standing position, 4) outcomes measures of discomfort (comfort), performance, sit-stand behaviors, user satisfaction, kinematic and physiological measures. Search terms were: sit-stand, treadmill, bicycle, workstations, sedentary behavior, office ergonomics, and comfort. RESULTS: Many studies considered productivity, comfort and physiological measures as important outcomes to assess the efficacy of sit-stand workstations and the experimental design was variable. Preliminary data suggests that some amount of standing during an 8-hour workday could be beneficial without compromising user comfort or productivity; however, there is very little data on the efficacy of treadmill and bicycle workstations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary data from 26 studies, conducting large scale randomized controlled trials with ergonomic training as their essential component is recommended to understand the benefits of sit-stand workstations for prevention of sedentary work.
BACKGROUND: Sedentary work is associated with many adverse health outcomes, and sit-stand workstations in offices have emerged as a way to counteract sedentary work. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the existing knowledge on sit-stand workstations, treadmill workstations and bicycle workstations. METHODS: The inclusion/exclusion criteria were: 1) empirical research examining the effectiveness of sit-stand workstations in lab or field studies, 2) working adult population, 3) sit-stand workstation interventions where workers performed the same task from a seated or standing position, 4) outcomes measures of discomfort (comfort), performance, sit-stand behaviors, user satisfaction, kinematic and physiological measures. Search terms were: sit-stand, treadmill, bicycle, workstations, sedentary behavior, office ergonomics, and comfort. RESULTS: Many studies considered productivity, comfort and physiological measures as important outcomes to assess the efficacy of sit-stand workstations and the experimental design was variable. Preliminary data suggests that some amount of standing during an 8-hour workday could be beneficial without compromising user comfort or productivity; however, there is very little data on the efficacy of treadmill and bicycle workstations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary data from 26 studies, conducting large scale randomized controlled trials with ergonomic training as their essential component is recommended to understand the benefits of sit-stand workstations for prevention of sedentary work.
Keywords:
Musculoskeletal symptoms; comfort and health; ergonomics training; productivity
Authors: Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-17
Authors: Paul Gonzalo Arauz; María-Gabriela García; Mauricio Velez; Cesar León; Francisco Velez; Bernard Martin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frincy Francis; Sheeba E Johnsunderraj; K Y Divya; Divya Raghavan; Atiya Al-Furgani; Lily P Bera; Aniamma Abraham Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2021-06-21
Authors: Anna Puig-Ribera; Judit Bort-Roig; Maria Giné-Garriga; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Jesús Fortuño; Joan C Martori; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Raimon Milà; Nicholas D Gilson; Jim McKenna Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Stuart J H Biddle; Jason A Bennie; Katrien De Cocker; David Dunstan; Paul A Gardiner; Genevieve N Healy; Brigid Lynch; Neville Owen; Charlotte Brakenridge; Wendy Brown; Matthew Buman; Bronwyn Clark; Ing-Mari Dohrn; Mitch Duncan; Nicholas Gilson; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander; Toby Pavey; Natasha Reid; Corneel Vandelanotte; Ineke Vergeer; Grace E Vincent Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390