Literature DB >> 26444941

Implications of sit-stand and active workstations to counteract the adverse effects of sedentary work: A comprehensive review.

Sohit Karol1,2, Michelle M Robertson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedentary work is associated with many adverse health outcomes, and sit-stand workstations in offices have emerged as a way to counteract sedentary work.
OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the existing knowledge on sit-stand workstations, treadmill workstations and bicycle workstations.
METHODS: The inclusion/exclusion criteria were: 1) empirical research examining the effectiveness of sit-stand workstations in lab or field studies, 2) working adult population, 3) sit-stand workstation interventions where workers performed the same task from a seated or standing position, 4) outcomes measures of discomfort (comfort), performance, sit-stand behaviors, user satisfaction, kinematic and physiological measures. Search terms were: sit-stand, treadmill, bicycle, workstations, sedentary behavior, office ergonomics, and comfort.
RESULTS: Many studies considered productivity, comfort and physiological measures as important outcomes to assess the efficacy of sit-stand workstations and the experimental design was variable. Preliminary data suggests that some amount of standing during an 8-hour workday could be beneficial without compromising user comfort or productivity; however, there is very little data on the efficacy of treadmill and bicycle workstations.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary data from 26 studies, conducting large scale randomized controlled trials with ergonomic training as their essential component is recommended to understand the benefits of sit-stand workstations for prevention of sedentary work.

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal symptoms; comfort and health; ergonomics training; productivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444941     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-152168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  10 in total

Review 1.  Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.

Authors:  Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-17

2.  Lower limb blood flow and mean arterial pressure during standing and seated work: Implications for workplace posture recommendations.

Authors:  David M Antle; Lauren Cormier; Megan Findlay; Linda L Miller; Julie N Côté
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-03-05

3.  Association of Personality on Changes in Weekday Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional and Prospective Evaluation.

Authors:  Chelsea Joyner; Stuart J H Biddle; Paul D Loprinzi
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-01-31

4.  Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.

Authors:  Roman P Kuster; Maria Hagströmer; Daniel Baumgartner; Wilhelmus J A Grooten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Does treadmill workstation use affect user's kinematic gait symmetry?

Authors:  Paul Gonzalo Arauz; María-Gabriela García; Mauricio Velez; Cesar León; Francisco Velez; Bernard Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sedentary time and its association with risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Wu Jingjie; Lili Yang; Ye Jing; Lulu Ran; Xu Yiqing; Na Zhou
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Ergonomic Stressors Among Pregnant Healthcare Workers: Impact on pregnancy outcomes and recommended safety practices.

Authors:  Frincy Francis; Sheeba E Johnsunderraj; K Y Divya; Divya Raghavan; Atiya Al-Furgani; Lily P Bera; Aniamma Abraham
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-06-21

8.  Impact of a workplace 'sit less, move more' program on efficiency-related outcomes of office employees.

Authors:  Anna Puig-Ribera; Judit Bort-Roig; Maria Giné-Garriga; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Jesús Fortuño; Joan C Martori; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Raimon Milà; Nicholas D Gilson; Jim McKenna
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Evidence of Workplace Interventions-A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Claudia Pieper; Sarah Schröer; Anna-Lisa Eilerts
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank.

Authors:  Stuart J H Biddle; Jason A Bennie; Katrien De Cocker; David Dunstan; Paul A Gardiner; Genevieve N Healy; Brigid Lynch; Neville Owen; Charlotte Brakenridge; Wendy Brown; Matthew Buman; Bronwyn Clark; Ing-Mari Dohrn; Mitch Duncan; Nicholas Gilson; Tracy Kolbe-Alexander; Toby Pavey; Natasha Reid; Corneel Vandelanotte; Ineke Vergeer; Grace E Vincent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.