| Literature DB >> 26444271 |
Santosh K Yadav1, Rakesh K Gupta2, Vivek A Saraswat3, Murali Rangan4, Michael A Thomas5, Sergio Rutella6, Silvio Danese7, Ena Wang8, Francesco M Marincola9, Mohammad Haris10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a form of liver disease with high short-term mortality. ACLF offers considerable potential to affect the cortical areas by significant tissue injury due to loss of neurons and other supporting cells. We measured changes in cortical thickness and metabolites profile in ACLF patients following treatment, and compared it with those of age matched healthy volunteers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26444271 PMCID: PMC4596551 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0679-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Characteristics and outcome of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
| Cases | Age/sex | Chronic etiology | Acute etiology | Grade of HE | Jaundice-HE interval (days) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 45/F | Cryptogenic | HEV | 2 | 3 | Discharged |
| #2 | 41/M | Cryptogenic | HEV | 2 | 4 | Discharged |
| #3 | 48/M | Cryptogenic | HEV | 2 | 4 | Discharged |
| #4 | 50/M | Wilson disease | ATT | 4 | 2 | Discharged |
| #5 | 50/M | HBV | HBV | 1 | 25 | Discharged |
| #6 | 44/M | Cryptogenic | Unknown | 2 | 20 | Discharged |
| #7 | 30/M | HBV | HBV | 2 | 4 | Discharged |
| #8 | 35/F | Cryptogenic | HBV | 3 | 4 | Discharged |
| #9 | 50/F | Cryptogenic | HAV | 3 | 3 | Discharged |
| #10 | 50/M | HBV | HBV | 2 | 2 | Deceased |
| #11 | 32/M | HCV | HEV | 4 | 9 | Deceased |
| #12 | 35/M | Cryptogenic | HEV | 4 | 14 | Discharged |
| #13 | 25/M | Cryptogenic | Unknown | 4 | 23 | Deceased |
| #14 | 47/M | Cryptogenic | Unknown | 3 | 12 | Deceased |
| #15 | 48/M | Cryptogenic | Unknown | 1 | 14 | Deceased |
HBV hepatitis B virus, HEV hepatitis E virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, HE hepatic encephalopathy
Surface areas of significantly reduced cortical thickness in baseline ACLF over control from both hemispheres
| Cluster no. | Structures in area | Max t-statistic | Size (mm2) | TalX | TalY | TalZ | Cortical thickness (Mean ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Baseline | ||||||||
| 1 | L | Rostral middle frontal | 6.48 | 965 | −42.7 | 29.1 | 30.1 | 2.45 ± 0.10 | 2.17 ± 0.11 |
| 2 | L | Superior frontal | 4.55 | 935 | −9.6 | 63.2 | 13.7 | 2.66 ± 0.24 | 2.24 ± 0.16 |
| 3 | L | Pars triangularis | 4.52 | 1251 | −50.8 | 24.9 | 5.9 | 2.58 ± 0.13 | 2.29 ± 0.12 |
| 4 | L | Posterior cingulate | 4.41 | 162 | −10.9 | −2.6 | 39.8 | 2.60 ± 0.13 | 2.35 ± 0.17 |
| 5 | L | Inferior temporal | 4.31 | 536 | −55.5 | −33.2 | −16.6 | 2.76 ± 0.17 | 2.48 ± 0.11 |
| 6 | L | Lateral orbitofrontal | 4.16 | 284 | −12.4 | 42.6 | −21.9 | 2.16 ± 0.17 | 1.89 ± 0.11 |
| 7 | L | Caudal middle frontal | 3.95 | 264 | −42 | 2.4 | 48.5 | 2.65 ± 0.23 | 2.32 ± 0.13 |
| 8 | L | Precentral | 3.67 | 229 | −55.1 | −3.2 | 38.8 | 2.69 ± 0.14 | 2.46 ± 0.10 |
| 9 | L | Entorhinal | 3.59 | 75 | −19.9 | −14.2 | −28.5 | 3.16 ± 0.18 | 2.80 ± 0.20 |
| 10 | L | Superior temporal | 3.51 | 137 | −63.5 | −30.1 | 7.3 | 2.68 ± 0.15 | 2.40 ± 0.15 |
| 11 | L | Inferior temporal | 3.51 | 454 | −41.2 | −0.2 | −36.8 | 3.30 ± 0.25 | 2.81 ± 0.26 |
| 12 | L | Middle temporal | 2.99 | 390 | −51.2 | −20.2 | −14.8 | 2.64 ± 0.25 | 2.33 ± 0.13 |
| 13 | L | Supramarginal | 2.80 | 35 | −60 | −26.8 | 21.2 | 2.54 ± 0.17 | 2.38 ± 0.13 |
| 14 | L | Pars opercularis | 2.76 | 29 | −34.7 | 12.7 | 24.4 | 2.22 ± 0.17 | 2.01 ± 0.10 |
| 15 | L | Supramarginal | 2.63 | 11 | −52.2 | −47 | 43.9 | 2.63 ± 0.18 | 2.38 ± 0.16 |
| 16 | L | Pars opercularis | 2.59 | 15 | −44.2 | 5.2 | 7.8 | 2.67 ± 0.15 | 2.49 ± 0.15 |
| 17 | L | Middle temporal | 2.59 | 18 | −56.4 | −7.9 | −27.8 | 3.08 ± 0.24 | 2.78 ± 0.17 |
| 18 | L | Lingual | −2.58 | 21 | −7.4 | −68.3 | −0.3 | 1.71 ± 0.13 | 1.97 ± 0.23 |
| 19 | L | Inferior parietal | 2.54 | 5 | −39.7 | −68.5 | 35.1 | 2.45 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.17 |
| 1 | R | Parahippocampal | 5.74 | 191 | 23.3 | −23.6 | −23.2 | 2.93 ± 0.17 | 2.48 ± 0.16 |
| 2 | R | Rostral middle frontal | 5.29 | 537 | 35.9 | 45.7 | 21.6 | 2.27 ± 0.06 | 2.01 ± 0.12 |
| 3 | R | Pars triangularis | 5.19 | 888 | 54.3 | 26.1 | 9.1 | 2.63 ± 0.09 | 2.32 ± 0.14 |
| 4 | R | Lateral orbitofrontal | 4.96 | 402 | 15.5 | 35.5 | −24 | 2.24 ± 0.17 | 1.94 ± 0.11 |
| 5 | R | Superior frontal | 4.45 | 270 | 17.7 | 38.7 | 42.2 | 2.54 ± 0.08 | 2.27 ± 0.14 |
| 6 | R | Pars orbitalis | 3.92 | 728 | 40.2 | 51 | −7.2 | 2.53 ± 0.16 | 2.13 ± 0.22 |
| 7 | R | Posterior cingulate | 3.84 | 94 | 9.7 | −1.6 | 41.2 | 2.65 ± 0.18 | 2.36 ± 0.12 |
| 8 | R | Postcentral | 3.44 | 121 | 61.5 | −9.7 | 30.5 | 2.46 ± 0.14 | 2.17 ± 0.16 |
| 9 | R | Precuneus | 3.44 | 88 | 7.4 | −60.7 | 57.3 | 2.37 ± 0.16 | 2.11 ± 0.17 |
| 10 | R | Rostral middle frontal | 3.45 | 725 | 23.1 | 54.6 | 21.1 | 2.30 ± 0.16 | 2.05 ± 0.15 |
| 11 | R | Superior temporal | 3.41 | 263 | 51.6 | −18.1 | −5.4 | 2.77 ± 0.21 | 2.47 ± 0.15 |
| 12 | R | Precentral | 2.91 | 60 | 50.4 | −0.1 | 41.4 | 2.72 ± 0.22 | 2.41 ± 0.17 |
| 13 | R | Superior frontal | 2.90 | 65 | 7.9 | 37.4 | 42.5 | 2.81 ± 0.19 | 2.51 ± 0.21 |
| 14 | R | Caudal middle frontal | 2.83 | 21 | 31 | 13.9 | 47.8 | 2.46 ± 0.12 | 2.25 ± 0.16 |
| 15 | R | Superior temporal | 2.73 | 29 | 49.8 | 6.3 | −16.9 | 3.22 ± 0.33 | 2.74 ± 0.32 |
Each area consists of adjacent voxels showing a significant group difference; some brain structures have more than one area of change. The magnitude of the peak (t statistic) in each area and its Tailarach coordinates (a standardized common brain space) are listed, together with the size (in normalized space) and the mean and SD of the cortical thickness for the control and baseline ACLF groups
L left, R right
Fig. 1Brain regions showing significantly reduced cortical thickness in baseline ACLF patients compare to control subjects in the left hemispheres overlaid on inflated pial surface, include rostral middle frontal (1), superior frontal (2), pars triangularis (3), posterior cingulate (4), inferior temporal (5), lateral orbitofrontal (6), caudal middle frontal (7), precentral (8), entorhinal (9), superior temporal (10), inferior temporal (11), middle temporal (12), supramarginal (13), pars opercularis (14), supramarginal (15), pars opercularis (16), middle temporal (17), lingual (18), and inferior parietal (19) and right hemispheres include parahippocampal (1), rostral middle frontal (2), pars triangularis (3), lateral orbitofrontal (4), superior frontal (5), pars orbitalis (6), posterior cingulate (7), postcentral (8), precuneus (9), rostral middle frontal (10), superior temporal (11), precentral (12), superior frontal (13), caudal middle frontal (14), and superior temporal (15)
Fig. 2Brain regions showing significantly reduced cortical thickness in ACLF post recovery over control subjects in the left hemispheres overlaid on inflated pial surface, include posterior cingulate (1), middle temporal (2), and superior frontal (3) and right hemispheres include paracentral (1), parahippocampal (2), lateral orbitofrontal (3), and posterior cingulate (4)
Surface areas of significantly reduced CT in ACLF post-recovery over control and increased CT in post-recovery over baseline from both hemispheres
| Cluster No. | Structures in area | Max t statistic | Size (mm2) | TalX | TalY | TalZ | Thickness (mm), mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Post ACLF | ||||||||
| 1 | L | Posterior cingulate | 5.392 | 79 | −5.8 | −13.9 | 39.2 | 2.77 ± 0.19 | 2.63 ± 0.16 |
| 2 | L | Middle temporal | 4.887 | 196 | −45.6 | 3.8 | −34.3 | 3.27 ± 0.23 | 2.99 ± 0.21 |
| 3 | L | Superior frontal | 4.768 | 62 | −11 | 14 | 45.6 | 2.59 ± 0.16 | 2.54 ± 0.23 |
| 1 | R | Paracentral | 5.153 | 166 | 10.1 | −15.5 | 48.9 | 2.44 ± 0.12 | 2.42 ± 0.21 |
| 2 | R | Parahippocampal | 4.928 | 59 | 25.2 | −20.9 | −27.3 | 3.20 ± 0.31 | 3.03 ± 0.22 |
| 3 | R | Lateral orbitofrontal | 4.671 | 50 | 30.4 | 28.9 | −2.4 | 2.72 ± 0.12 | 2.62 ± 0.23 |
| 4 | R | Posterior cingulate | 3.926 | 17 | 5.1 | −12.5 | 39.4 | 2.65 ± 0.13 | 2.64 ± 0.24 |
Each area consists of adjacent voxels showing a significant group difference; some brain structures have more than one area of change. The magnitude of the peak (t statistic) in each area and its Tailarach coordinates (a standardized common brain space) are listed, together with the size (in normalized space) and the mean and SD of the cortical thickness for control and post recovery ACLF group. And baseline and post recovery ACLF group
CT cortical thickness, L left, R right
Fig. 3Brain regions with scatter plots showing significantly increased cortical thickness in post recovery compare to baseline in the left hemispheres overlaid on inflated pial surface, include lateral orbitofrontal, rostral middle frontal, rostral middle frontal, rostral middle frontal, superior frontal, and Lateral orbitofrontal and right hemispheres, include entorhinal, superior frontal, rostral middle frontal, lateral orbitofrontal, and pars triangularis
Mean and standard deviation of metabolites level in ACLF (baseline) compared to controls and follow−up
| Groups | Metabolites (mmol/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| NAA | MI | Glx | |
| Control (a) | 12.9 ± 1.30 | 2.60 ± 0.50 | 15.0 ± 2.50 |
| Baseline (b) | 10.9 ± 1.15 | 1.40 ± 0.69 | 22.5 ± 5.41 |
| Follow−up (c) | 11.2 ± 1.00 | 1.72 ± 0.41 | 18.1 ± 3.62 |
| p-values | |||
| a vs b | a − b = 0.001 | a −b = 0.001 | a − b = 0.001 |
| a vs c | a − c = 0.004 | a − c = 0.001 | a − c = 0.030 |
| b vs c | b − c = 0.424 | b − c = 0.184 | b − c = 0.024 |
NAA N-acetyl aspartate, mI myo inositol, Glx glutamine/glutamate
Fig. 4On bar graphs control subjects are showing significantly lower trail making test scores (NCT-A,B and FCT-A,B) and higher WAIS-P test scores (PC, DS, BD, PA and OA) as compared to post recovery ACLF after 3 weeks of conservative therapy