| Literature DB >> 26444161 |
Natália Chantal Magalhães da Silva1, Érika de Cássia Lopes Chaves2, Emilia Campos de Carvalho1, Leonardo César Carvalho2, Denise Hollanda Iunes2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of foot reflexology on feet impairment of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26444161 PMCID: PMC4623722 DOI: 10.1590/0104-1169.0036.2594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Figure 1Flowchart Consort. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2014.
Comparison of the evaluations between Treated Group and Control Group in the indicators of feet impairment related to skin and hair. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2014
*Regression coefficient
†Standard Error
‡P value <0.05
Comparison of the evaluations between Treated Group and Control Group in the indicators of feet impairment related to blood circulation. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2014
| Blood Circulation | Treated Group X Control Group | β* | S.E.† (β) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue perfusion | Initial evaluation | 0.25 | 0.56 | 0.659 |
| 2nd evaluation | -1.35 | 0.78 | 0.082 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.21 | 0.88 | 0.808 | |
| Pedal pulses | Initial evaluation | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.122 |
| 2nd evaluation | -1.05 | 0.93 | 0.256 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -2.21 | 1.34 | 0.099 | |
| Tibial pulses | Initial evaluation | -0.13 | 0.61 | 0.827 |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.05 | 0.86 | 0.953 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.66 | 0.98 | 0.499 | |
| Edema | Initial evaluation | -0.21 | 0.76 | 0.518 |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.19 | 0.55 | 0.480 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.52 | 0.42 | 0.245 | |
| Varicose | Initial evaluation | -0.12 | 0.59 | 0.842 |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.81 | 0.62 | 0.190 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.12 | 0.61 | 0.844 |
P value <0.05; *Regression coefficient; †Standard error.
Comparison of the evaluations between Treated Group and Control Group in the indicators of feet impairment related to sensibility. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2014
| Sensibility | Treated Group X Control Group | β* | S.E.† (β) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score of neuropathic symptoms | Initial evaluation | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.341 |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.48 | 0.50 | 0.336 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.44 | 0.62 | 0.474 | |
| 10-g monofilament Test | Initial evaluation | -0.88 | 0.57 | 0.123 |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.21 | 0.56 | 0.132 | |
| 3rd evaluation | -0.76 | 0.48 | 0.116 |
P value <0.05; *Regression coefficient; †Standard error.
Comparison of the evaluations between Treated Group and Control Group in the indicators of feet impairment related to tissue temperature. Alfenas, MG, Brazil, 2014
| Tissue Temperature | Treated Group X Control Group | β* | S.E.† (β) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial evaluation | -0.44 | 0.52 | 0.590 | |
| 2nd evaluation | -0.49 | 0.61 | 0.496 | |
| 3rd evaluation | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.089 |
P value <0.05; *Regression coefficient; †Standard error.