Literature DB >> 26444130

Enhancing Participation in Depression Care in Outpatient Perinatal Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

Nancy Byatt1, Leonard L Levin, Douglas Ziedonis, Tiffany A Moore Simas, Jeroan Allison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine a wide range of study designs and outcomes to estimate the extent to which interventions in outpatient perinatal care settings are associated with an increase in the uptake of depression care. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus (EMBASE) were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2014 that evaluated mental health care use after screening for depression in perinatal care settings. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were: 1) English language; 2) pregnant and postpartum women who screened positive for depression; 3) exposure (validated depression screening in outpatient perinatal care setting); and, 4) outcome (mental health care use). Searches yielded 392 articles, 42 met criteria for full-text review, and 17 met inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using a modified Downs and Black scale. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: Articles were independently reviewed by two abstractors and consensus reached. Study design, intervention components, and mental health care use were defined and categorized. Seventeen articles representing a range of study designs, including one randomized controlled trial and one cluster randomized controlled trial, were included. The average quality rating was 61% (31.0-90.0%). When no intervention was in place, an average of 22% (13.8-33.0%) of women who screened positive for depression had at least one mental health visit. The average rate of mental health care use was associated with a doubling of this rate with patient engagement strategies (44%, 29.0-90.0%), on-site assessments (49%, 25.2-90.0%), and perinatal care provider training (54%, 1.0-90.0%). High rates of mental health care use (81%, 72.0-90.0%) were associated with implementation of additional interventions, including resource provision to women, perinatal care provider training, on-site assessment, and access to mental health consultation for perinatal care providers.
CONCLUSION: Screening alone was associated with 22% mental health care use among women who screened positive for depression; however, implementation of additional interventions was associated with a two to fourfold increased use of mental health care. Although definitive studies are still needed, screening done in conjunction with interventions that target patient, health care provider, and practice-level barriers is associated with increased improved rates of depression detection, assessment, referral, and treatment in perinatal care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444130      PMCID: PMC4618720          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  28 in total

1.  Outcomes of Implementing Routine Screening and Referrals for Perinatal Mood Disorders in an Integrated Multi-site Pediatric and Obstetric Setting.

Authors:  Lucy J Puryear; Yen H Nong; Nancy P Correa; Katherine Cox; Christopher S Greeley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-10

2.  Utilization of Health Care Among Perinatal Women in the United States: The Role of Depression.

Authors:  Grace A Masters; Nienchen Li; Kate L Lapane; Shao-Hsien Liu; Sharina D Person; Nancy Byatt
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  A Systematic Review of Integrated Care Interventions Addressing Perinatal Depression Care in Ambulatory Obstetric Care Settings.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Michael P Flynn; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Stephanie M Carvalho; Leonard L Levin; Kathleen Biebel; Nancy Byatt
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Text messaging to support a perinatal collaborative care model for depression: A multi-methods inquiry.

Authors:  Amritha Bhat; Johnny Mao; Jürgen Unützer; Susan Reed; Jennifer Unger
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.238

5.  Screening for and preventing perinatal depression.

Authors:  Bonnie D Kerker; Judy A Greene; Rachel Gerson; Michele Pollock; Kimberly E Hoagwood; Sarah McCue Horwitz
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2018-06-20

6.  Co-located perinatal psychiatry clinic: impact of adding a psychologist on clinical quality improvement metrics.

Authors:  Deepa Pawar; Chiang-Ching Huang; Christina Wichman
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.949

7.  Improving Perinatal Mental Health Care for Women Veterans: Description of a Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Jodie G Katon; Lacey Lewis; Selma Hercinovic; Amanda McNab; John Fortney; Susan M Rose
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-08

8.  PRogram In Support of Moms (PRISM): a pilot group randomized controlled trial of two approaches to improving depression among perinatal women.

Authors:  Nancy Byatt; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Kathleen Biebel; Padma Sankaran; Lori Pbert; Linda Weinreb; Douglas Ziedonis; Jeroan Allison
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.949

9.  Delivering perinatal depression care in a rural obstetric setting: a mixed methods study of feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness.

Authors:  Amritha Bhat; Susan Reed; Johnny Mao; Mindy Vredevoogd; Joan Russo; Jennifer Unger; Roger Rowles; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.949

10.  Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program for Moms: Utilization and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Nancy Byatt; John Straus; Arielle Stopa; Kathleen Biebel; Leena Mittal; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.