Literature DB >> 26444106

Maternal Influenza Vaccination and Risk for Congenital Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Konstantinos A Polyzos1, Athanasios A Konstantelias, Chrysanthi E Pitsa, Matthew E Falagas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically summarize the literature on maternal influenza vaccination and the risk for congenital malformations using the methodology of meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases (up to December 2014) as well as ClinicalTrials.gov (May 2015) and references of relevant articles were searched. The search strategy included combinations of the terms "influenza," "vaccin*," "pregnan*," "safe*," "adverse," "congenital," "malformation," "defect," and "anomal*." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies examined the association between antepartum or preconceptional maternal immunization with inactivated influenza vaccines (seasonal trivalent or monovalent H1N1) and the risk for congenital malformations. Studies with no or inappropriate control group (comparison with population background rates or other vaccine types) were excluded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: The risk for congenital anomalies after influenza vaccination was examined in 15 studies: 14 cohorts (events per vaccinated compared with unvaccinated: 859/32,774 [2.6%] compared with 7,644/245,314 [3.1%]) and one case-control study (vaccinated per cases compared with controls: 1,351/3,618 [37.3%] compared with 511/1,225 [41.7%]). Eight studies reported on first-trimester immunization (events per vaccinated compared with unvaccinated: 258/4,733 [5.4%] compared with 6,470/196,054 [3.3%]). No association was found between congenital defects and influenza vaccination at any trimester of pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.07; 15 studies; I2=36) or at the first trimester (OR 1.03, 0.91-1.18; eight studies; I2=0). When assessing only major malformations, no increased risk was detected after immunization at any trimester (OR 0.99, 0.88-1.11; 12 studies; I2=31.5) or at the first trimester (OR 0.98, 0.83-1.16; seven studies; I2=0). Neither adjuvanted (OR 1.06, 0.95-1.20; five studies; I2=18.8) nor unadjuvanted vaccines (OR 0.89, 0.75-1.04; seven studies; I2=22.6) were associated with an increased risk for congenital defects.
CONCLUSION: This systematic review did not indicate an increased risk for congenital anomalies after maternal influenza immunization adding to the evidence base on the safety of influenza vaccination in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444106     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  18 in total

1.  Why, when and for what diseases pregnant and new mothers "should" be vaccinated.

Authors:  Giovanni Gabutti; Giorgio Conforti; Alberto Tomasi; Parvanè Kuhdari; Paolo Castiglia; Rosa Prato; Silvia Memmini; Chiara Azzari; Giovanni Vitali Rosati; Paolo Bonanni
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Influenza.

Authors:  Timothy M Uyeki
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Review of the status and challenges associated with increasing influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in China.

Authors:  Suizan Zhou; Carolyn M Greene; Ying Song; Ran Zhang; Lance E Rodewald; Luzhao Feng; Alexander J Millman
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Major Birth Defects after Vaccination Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990 to 2014.

Authors:  Pedro L Moro; Janet Cragan; Paige Lewis; Lakshmi Sukumaran
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Maternal vaccination for the prevention of influenza: current status and hopes for the future.

Authors:  Varun K Phadke; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 6.  Barriers and Facilitators Associated With Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake Among Pregnant Women in High Income Countries: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Xiao Qiu; Heather Bailey; Claire Thorne
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Maternal immunisation: What have been the gains? Where are the gaps? What does the future hold?

Authors:  Michelle L Giles; Sushena Krishnaswamy; Euan M Wallace
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Safety of COVID-19 vaccines, their components or their platforms for pregnant women: A rapid review.

Authors:  Agustín Ciapponi; Ariel Bardach; Agustina Mazzoni; Tomás Alconada; Steven Anderson; Fernando J Argento; Jamile Ballivian; Karin Bok; Daniel Comandé; Emily Erbelding; Erin Goucher; Beate Kampmann; Ruth Karron; Flor M Munoz; María Carolina Palermo; Edward P K Parker; Federico Rodriguez Cairoli; María Victoria Santa; Andy Stergachis; Gerald Voss; Xu Xiong; Natalia Zamora; Sabra Zaraa; Mabel Berrueta; Pierre M Buekens
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-06-06

Review 9.  Lessons learnt from the implementation of maternal immunization programs in England.

Authors:  G Amirthalingam; L Letley; H Campbell; D Green; J Yarwood; M Ramsay
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Vaccination of pregnant women in the Valencian Community during the 2014-15 influenza season: a multicentre study.

Authors:  J Tuells; N Rodríguez-Blanco; J L Duro Torrijos; R Vila-Candel; A Nolasco Bonmati
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.