| Literature DB >> 26443972 |
Ramiro B Nunes1, Jadson P Alves1, Luíza P Kessler1, André Z Dornelles1, Giuseppe P Stefani1, Pedro D Lago1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of continuous versus interval aerobic exercise training on hemodynamic parameters, cardiac remodeling, and maximal exercise capacity (MEC) in chronic heart failure (CHF) rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26443972 PMCID: PMC4620973 DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Phys Ther ISSN: 1413-3555 Impact factor: 3.377
Myocardial infarct size, pulmonary and hepatic congestion, and cardiac hypertrophy
| Parameters | CHF-Sed | CHF-ACT | CHF-AIT |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIS (%) | 41±3 | 40±4 | 39±2 | 0.8602 | 0.43 |
| PC (%) | 75±1 | 73±2* | 73±1* | 7.402 | 0.0037 |
| HC (%) | 71±1 | 70±1 | 71 | 2.451 | 0.11 |
| LVM:BM (mg/g) | 3.5±0.2 | 2.9±0.4* | 3±0.3* | 11.45 | 0.0004 |
Values are shown as mean±SD. MIS: myocardial infarct size; PC: pulmonary congestion; HC: hepatic congestion; LVM:BM: left ventricular mass/body mass ratio. * P<0.05 vs. CHF-Sed. One-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used for statistical analysis.
Hemodynamic variables.
| Hemodynamics | CHF-Sed | CHF-ACT | CHF-AIT |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 267±69 | 290±61 | 274±57 | 0.2903 | 0.75 |
| LVEDP (mmHg) | 30±3 | 18±6* | 20±7* | 9.760 | 0.001 |
| LVSP (mmHg) | 83±13 | 105±9* | 103±9* | 10.82 | 0.0006 |
| +dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 3341±363 | 5938±1327*† | 4903±926* | 14.92 | 0.0001 |
| –dP/dtmax (mmHg/s) | – 2263±223 | – 4198±1239*† | – 3293±761* | 10.41 | 0.0007 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 86±18 | 108±22* | 105 ±15 * | 4.932 | 0.01 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 71±7 | 87±14* | 85±13* | 4.133 | 0.03 |
Values are mean±SD. HR: heart rate; LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure; +dP/dtmax: maximum positive derivative of LV pressure; -dP/dtmax: maximum negative derivative of LV pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure. One-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used for statistical analysis. *P<0.05 vs. CHF-Sed. †P<0.05 vs. CHF-AIT.
Body mass and maximum exercise test.
| CHF-Sed | CHF-ACT | CHF-AIT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Body mass (g) | 257±15 | 343±39* | 270±19 | 348±32* | 253±21 | 323±36* |
| Exercise test (s) | 678±105 | 516±98* | 671±98 | 948±153*† | 677±96 | 1082±145*†# |
Values are mean±SD. Two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare groups in pre moment and post moment. Body mass: Interaction (F(2.41)=0.3155; P>0.05), training (F(2.41)=2.189; P>0.05), time (F(2.41)=89.99; P<0.001. Exercise test: Interaction (F(2.41)=41.07; P<0.001), training (F(2.41)=38.15; P<0.001), time (F(2.41)=44.64; P<0.001. * P<0.01 from pre to post. † P<0.05 vs. CHF-Sed. # P<0.05 vs. CHF-ACT.
Figure 1.Representation of picrosirius red stained ventricular sections under polarized light. (A) CHF-Sed group; (B) CHF-ACT group; (C) CHF-AIT group; (D) Collagen mean values. Mean ± SD. F ((2,16)= 40.89; P=0.0001) * P<0.05 vs. CHF-Sed group. One-way ANOVA followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used for statistical analysis.