Literature DB >> 26443447

Active fixation of a thin transvenous left-ventricular lead by a side helix facilitates targeted and stable placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Håvard Keilegavlen1, Thomas Hovstad2, Svein Færestrand3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Suboptimal placement, phrenic nerve stimulation, and dislodgements of left-ventricular (LV) leads are main challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the handling, performance, safety, and stability for a novel 4Fr LV lead with a small side helix located proximal to the ring electrode for active fixation of the LV lead. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The novel LV lead was successfully implanted in 103 of 106 patients. Patients with dislodged LV leads and with demanding coronary vein anatomies were included. The lead body was rotated clockwise to engage the active fixation side helix in the vein wall. The stimulating electrode was located in basal LV segment and middle LV segment in 54 and 46% of the patients, respectively. The lead was targeted to a vein concordant to the LV segment with latest mechanical activation. Concordant LV lead placement was achieved in 73% of the patients and in adjacent segment in 24%. The average pacing capture threshold (PCT) at implantation was 1.04 ± 0.6 V (n = 103) and at an average follow-up at 7 months, the PCT remained low and no dislodgements have been observed. During follow-up, four leads have been explanted without complications.
CONCLUSION: Active fixation of this 4Fr LV lead by using a side helix, offers flexibility to place the lead precisely in targeted vein segments over a wide range of vein anatomies. The average LV pacing threshold was low at implantation and follow-ups. The lead seems to be extractable and no late dislodgements have been observed. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active fixation; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Lead dislodgement; Left ventricular lead placement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443447     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  7 in total

1.  Is ventricular sensing always right, when it is left?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Giulia de Zan; Giulia Massaro; Andrea Angeletti; Cristian Martignani; Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Matteo Ziacchi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  First experience in quadripolar active fixation coronary sinus lead extraction: a case report.

Authors:  Elhosseyn Guella; Michael Brack; Khalid Abozguia; Christopher John Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-22

3.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in persistent left superior vena cava: Can you do it two-leads-only?

Authors:  Mauro Biffi; Giulia Massaro; Igor Diemberger; Cristian Martignani; Alessandro Corzani; Matteo Ziacchi
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

4.  Performance of an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead vs passive fixation quadripolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy, a randomized trial.

Authors:  Havard Keilegavlen; Peter Schuster; Thomas Hovstad; Svein Faerestrand
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-11-08

5.  Novel lead anchor technique using an active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Yukihiro Inamura; Osamu Inaba; Akira Sato; Junichi Nitta; Masahiko Goya; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-02

6.  An active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy with reduced postoperative complication rates.

Authors:  Calum Robertson; Owen Duffey; Pok-Tin Tang; Natalie Fairhurst; Cristiana Monteiro; Peregrine Green; Joanna Grogono; Mark Davies; Andrew Lewis; Rohan Wijesurendra; Julian Ormerod; James Gamble; Matthew Ginks; Kim Rajappan; Yaver Bashir; Tim R Betts; Neil Herring
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison among left ventricular bipolar, quadripolar and active fixation leads.

Authors:  M Ziacchi; I Diemberger; A Corzani; C Martignani; A Mazzotti; G Massaro; C Valzania; C Rapezzi; G Boriani; M Biffi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.