BACKGROUND: Approximately 6000 children are born with CHD in Germany each year. It is increasingly rare that these children die from their chronic illness. In the present study, data recorded in the National Register for Congenital Heart Defects with respect to the prevalence of specific lesions and sex distribution are compared with that recorded in a published German prevalence study (Prevalence Study) and with the meta-analysis by van der Linde et al. METHODS: A descriptive data analysis was performed using a minimal data set. The demographic data included sex and birth year; the medical data comprised the cardiovascular diagnosis according to the short list of the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. RESULTS: As the data analysis shows, the National Register is a clinical register including primarily clinical cases/cases relevant to healthcare. The prevalence values and sex ratios recorded in the register are closer to the values given in the literature than those determined by the Prevalence Study. Severe CHD was slightly over-represented in the National Register compared with the van der Linde et al meta-analysis. The deviations with respect to prevalence values are within an acceptable range. CONCLUSION: With its 48,000 patients, the National Register plays a unique and important role for research in the field of CHD. Samples from the National Register can be used as a gold standard for future studies, as the patient population registered in it can be considered representative of CHD in Germany and Europe.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 6000 children are born with CHD in Germany each year. It is increasingly rare that these children die from their chronic illness. In the present study, data recorded in the National Register for Congenital Heart Defects with respect to the prevalence of specific lesions and sex distribution are compared with that recorded in a published German prevalence study (Prevalence Study) and with the meta-analysis by van der Linde et al. METHODS: A descriptive data analysis was performed using a minimal data set. The demographic data included sex and birth year; the medical data comprised the cardiovascular diagnosis according to the short list of the International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code. RESULTS: As the data analysis shows, the National Register is a clinical register including primarily clinical cases/cases relevant to healthcare. The prevalence values and sex ratios recorded in the register are closer to the values given in the literature than those determined by the Prevalence Study. Severe CHD was slightly over-represented in the National Register compared with the van der Linde et al meta-analysis. The deviations with respect to prevalence values are within an acceptable range. CONCLUSION: With its 48,000 patients, the National Register plays a unique and important role for research in the field of CHD. Samples from the National Register can be used as a gold standard for future studies, as the patient population registered in it can be considered representative of CHD in Germany and Europe.
Entities:
Keywords:
CHD; clinical register; prevalence; representative; sex distribution
Authors: Julia Remmele; Sandra Schiele; Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz; Peter Ewert; Ulrike M M Bauer; Paul Christian Helm Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-12
Authors: Julia Remmele; Paul Christian Helm; Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz; Ulrike Mm Bauer; Thomas Pickardt; Peter Ewert; Oktay Tutarel Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-05-13
Authors: Clara Stammnitz; Dörte Huscher; Ulrike M M Bauer; Aleksandra Urban; Johannes Nordmeyer; Stephan Schubert; Joachim Photiadis; Felix Berger; Sabine Klaassen Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Paul C Helm; Harald Kaemmerer; Günter Breithardt; Elisabeth J Sticker; Roland Keuchen; Rhoia Neidenbach; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Oktay Tutarel; Ulrike M M Bauer Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Jannos Siaplaouras; Claudia Niessner; Paul C Helm; Annika Jahn; Markus Flemming; Michael S Urschitz; Elisabeth Sticker; Hashim Abdul-Khaliq; Ulrike M Bauer; Christian Apitz Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Alicia Jeanette Fischer; Christin Grundlach; Paul C Helm; Ulrike Mm Bauer; Helmut Baumgartner; Gerhard-Paul Diller Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 3.243