Literature DB >> 26443272

Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion, using standardized criteria.

K-H Park1, G K Sandor2, Y-D Kim3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative stability following bimaxillary surgery performed either with or without preoperative orthodontic treatment, in class III malocclusion patients. These patients were enrolled using standardized inclusion criteria. Forty patients with a class III malocclusion were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were class III malocclusion with and without premolar extraction, <3mm midline deviation, and <5mm arch width discordance. Patients were assigned to the conventional bimaxillary surgery group (n=20) or the surgery-first bimaxillary surgery group (n=20). Serial cephalometric radiographs obtained before surgery (T0), at 2 months after surgery (T1), and at 6 months after surgery (T2) were used to assess the variation in surgical change (T0 to T1) and postsurgical change (T1 to T2). Eight linear and three angular parameters were used to evaluate postoperative stability. With respect to postsurgical changes, significant differences were observed in the changes for the vertical reference plane to the posterior nasal spine, horizontal reference plane to B-point, and occlusal plane angle in both groups. No statistically significant differences in the relapse rates were observed between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the postoperative stability.
Copyright © 2015 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inclusion criteria; mandibular prognathism; preoperative orthodontic treatment; relapse

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443272     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Surgery-first: a new approach to orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  F DE Nuccio; F DE Nuccio; M M D'Emidio; S Pelo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

2.  One-year postoperative skeletal stability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Liebregts; Frank Baan; Pieter van Lierop; Martien de Koning; Stefaan Bergé; Thomas Maal; Tong Xi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Skeletal stability after maxillary step osteotomy compared with original Le Fort I osteotomy during one-year of follow-up.

Authors:  Kazuto Kurohara; Nobuyoshi Tomomatsu; Koichi Nakakuki; Naoya Arai; Tetsuya Yoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Relapse and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) as postoperative complication in skeletal class III patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas Gosla Reddy; Ashutosh Dixit; Padmanidhi Agarwal; Rebecca Chowdhry; Ashi Chug
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Comparison of changes in the transverse dental axis between patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry treated by orthognathic surgery with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Han-Sol Song; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Kee-Joon Lee; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Stability of bimaxillary surgery involving intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with or without presurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Yoon-Soo Ahn; Sung-Hwan Choi; Kee-Joon Lee; Young-Soo Jung; Hyoung-Seon Baik; Hyung-Seog Yu
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.