Literature DB >> 2644310

Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate cases. Surgical changes and stability.

W J Houston1, D R James, E Jones, S Kavvadia.   

Abstract

Surgical and postsurgical changes in maxillary position following transpalatal osteotomy at the le Fort I level in 30 patients with clefts of lip and palate were evaluated cephalometrically. By superimposing on natural reference structures, a more accurate and detailed evaluation of change in maxillary position was possible than by using conventional cephalometric analyses. The mean horizontal advancement was 9 mm, with a mean vertical change of 3 mm. While it is customary to express postsurgical relapse as a percentage of surgical change (in this case 7% mean horizontal relapse and 23% mean vertical relapse), the most remarkable finding to emerge from this study was the variability in surgical and postsurgical change which would be obscured by concentrating on descriptive statistics. Postsurgical change was related to the amount of surgical change, but the correlation coefficients are quite low, and so other factors must be responsible for a significant proportion of any relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2644310     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(89)80121-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Maxillary advancement using distraction osteogenesis with intraoral device.

Authors:  Yoko Takigawa; Setsuko Uematsu; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Stability of Cleft maxilla in Le Fort I Maxillary advancement.

Authors:  Pushpa Kumari; S K Roy; I D Roy; Prasanna Kumar; Sanjeev Datana; Serat Rahman
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07

3.  Profile Changes and Stability following Distraction Osteogenesis with Rigid External Distraction in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Jaeson M Painatt; Ravi Veeraraghavan; Ushass Puthalath; Sherry Peter; Latha P Rao; Maria Kuriakose
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: Distraction osteogenesis vs. orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Adi Rachmiel; Michal Even-Almos; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

5.  Stability after Cleft Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis or Conventional Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Kristian Andersen; Martin Svenstrup; Thomas Klit Pedersen; Annelise Küseler; John Jensen; Sven Erik Nørholt
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  A Retrospective Study of Cleft lip and palate Patients' Satisfaction after Maxillary Distraction or Traditional Advancement of the Maxilla.

Authors:  Kristian Andersen; Sven Erik Nørholt; Annelise Küseler; John Jensen; Thomas Klit Pedersen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-07-01

7.  A case of cleft lip and palate with severe maxillary retrognathism treated by distraction osteogenesis and custom made intraoral rapid maxillary expansion appliance: A 2-year follow-up of retention.

Authors:  Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Prasad Mandava; Praveen Chirivella; Sridhar Reddy Kanabaddy
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.