Literature DB >> 26443049

Psychobiology of threat appraisal in the context of psychotic experiences: a selective review.

R Underwood1, E Peters2, V Kumari3.   

Abstract

A key factor in the transition to psychosis is the appraisal of anomalous experiences as threatening. Cognitive models of psychosis have identified attentional and interpretative biases underlying threat-based appraisals. While much research has been conducted into these biases within the clinical and cognitive literature, little examination has occurred at the neural level. However, neurobiological research in social cognition employing threatening stimuli mirror cognitive accounts of maladaptive appraisal in psychosis. This review attempted to integrate neuroimaging data regarding social cognition in psychosis with the concepts of attentional and interpretative threat biases. Systematic review methodology was used to identify relevant articles from Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE, and PubMed databases. The selective review showed that attentional and interpretative threat biases relate to abnormal activation of a range of subcortical and prefrontal structures, including the amygdala, insula, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, and prefrontal cortex, as well as disrupted connectivity between these regions, when processing threatening and neutral or ambiguous stimuli. Notably, neural findings regarding the misattribution of threat to neutral or ambiguous stimuli presented a more consistent picture. Overall, however, the findings for any specific emotion were mixed, both in terms of the specific brain areas involved and the direction of effects (increased/decreased activity), possibly owing to confounds including small sample sizes, varying experimental paradigms, medication, and heterogeneous, in some cases poorly characterised, patient groups. Further neuroimaging research examining these biases by employing experimentally induced anomalous perceptual experiences and well-characterised large samples is needed for greater aetiological specificity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appraisal; Cognitive bias; Neuroimaging; Psychosis; Threat processing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443049     DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Psychiatry        ISSN: 0924-9338            Impact factor:   5.361


  6 in total

1.  The tangled roots of inner speech, voices and delusions.

Authors:  Cherise Rosen; Simon McCarthy-Jones; Kayla A Chase; Clara S Humpston; Jennifer K Melbourne; Leah Kling; Rajiv P Sharma
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Mapping Depression in Schizophrenia: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Veena Kumari; Emmanuelle Peters; Ashley Guinn; Dominic Fannon; Tamara Russell; Alexander Sumich; Elizabeth Kuipers; Steven C R Williams; Dominic H Ffytche
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-12-27       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Stria terminalis, amygdala, and temporoparietal junction networks facilitate efficient emotion processing under expectations.

Authors:  Ilvana Dzafic; Lena Oestreich; Andrew K Martin; Bryan Mowry; Hana Burianová
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  You read my mind: fMRI markers of threatening appraisals in people with persistent psychotic experiences.

Authors:  Raphael Underwood; Liam Mason; Owen O'Daly; Jeffrey Dalton; Andrew Simmons; Gareth J Barker; Emmanuelle Peters; Veena Kumari
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 5.  Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity.

Authors:  Raphael Underwood; Eva Tolmeijer; Johannes Wibroe; Emmanuelle Peters; Liam Mason
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A single dose of cannabidiol modulates medial temporal and striatal function during fear processing in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Cathy Davies; Robin Wilson; Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi; Grace Blest-Hopley; Michael Brammer; Jesus Perez; Robin M Murray; Paul Allen; Matthijs G Bossong; Philip McGuire; Sagnik Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 6.222

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.