Literature DB >> 26443023

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor for long-term secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in relation to renal function: insights from the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial.

Giulia Magnani1, Robert F Storey2, Gabriel Steg3, Deepak L Bhatt1, Marc Cohen4, Julia Kuder1, Kyungah Im1, Philip Aylward5, Diego Ardissino6, Daniel Isaza7, Alexander Parkhomenko8, Assen R Goudev9, Mikael Dellborg10, Frederic Kontny11, Ramon Corbalan12, Felix Medina13, Eva C Jensen14, Peter Held14, Eugene Braunwald1, Marc S Sabatine1, Marc P Bonaca15.   

Abstract

AIMS: We evaluated the relationship of renal function and ischaemic and bleeding risk as well as the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor in stable patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with a history of MI 1-3 years prior from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 were stratified based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) pre-specified for analysis of the effect of ticagrelor on the primary efficacy composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE) and the primary safety endpoint of TIMI major bleeding. Of 20 898 patients, those with eGFR <60 (N = 4849, 23.2%) had a greater risk of MACE at 3 years relative to those without, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, HRadj 1.54, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.27-1.85, P < 0.001). The relative risk reduction in MACE with ticagrelor was similar in those with eGFR <60 (ticagrelor pooled vs. placebo: HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.96) vs. ≥60 (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-1.00, Pinteraction = 0.44). However, due to the greater absolute risk in the former group, the absolute risk reduction with ticagrelor was higher: 2.7 vs. 0.63%. Bleeding tended to occur more frequently in patients with renal dysfunction. The absolute increase in TIMI major bleeding with ticagrelor was similar in those with and without eGFR <60 (1.19 vs. 1.43%), whereas the excess of minor bleeding tended to be more pronounced (1.93 vs. 0.69%).
CONCLUSION: In patients with a history of MI, patients with renal dysfunction are at increased risk of MACE and consequently experience a particularly robust absolute risk reduction with long-term treatment with ticagrelor. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial infarction; Renal dysfunction; Secondary prevention; Ticagrelor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26443023     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  25 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of more potent antiplatelet therapy with vorapaxar in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  Simon Correa; Marc P Bonaca; Benjamin M Scirica; Sabina A Murphy; Erica L Goodrich; David A Morrow; Michelle L O'Donoghue
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Antiplatelet therapy: Net benefit of ticagrelor in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Noel C Chan; Jacqueline Bosch
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting coronary stents: an unanswered question.

Authors:  Cristina Aurigemma; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  [Secondary prevention with antiplatelet therapy in cardiac rehabilitation].

Authors:  Maria M Wanitschek; Hannes F Alber
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 5.  Long-Term Use of Ticagrelor in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Sara Ariotti; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  The myth of 'stable' coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Keith A A Fox; Marco Metra; João Morais; Dan Atar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CKD and Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A Mavrakanas; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Karim Gariani; Dean J Kereiakes; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Gérard Helft; Martine Gilard; Fausto Feres; Ricardo A Costa; Marie-Claude Morice; Jean-Louis Georges; Marco Valgimigli; Deepak L Bhatt; Laura Mauri; David M Charytan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Ticagrelor: A Review in Long Term Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Zaina T Al-Salama; Gillian M Keating; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Complexity of Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Sabouret; Michael P Savage; David Fischman; Francesco Costa
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.571

10.  Consensus Document ANMCO/ANCE/ARCA/GICR-IACPR/GISE/SICOA: Long-term Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Michele Massimo Gulizia; Furio Colivicchi; Maurizio Giuseppe Abrignani; Marco Ambrosetti; Nadia Aspromonte; Gabriella Barile; Roberto Caporale; Giancarlo Casolo; Emilia Chiuini; Andrea Di Lenarda; Pompilio Faggiano; Domenico Gabrielli; Giovanna Geraci; Alessio Gaetano La Manna; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alfredo Marchese; Ferdinando Maria Massari; Gian Francesco Mureddu; Giuseppe Musumeci; Federico Nardi; Antonio Vittorio Panno; Roberto Franco Enrico Pedretti; Massimo Piredda; Enrico Pusineri; Carmine Riccio; Roberta Rossini; Fortunato Scotto di Uccio; Stefano Urbinati; Ferdinando Varbella; Giovanni Battista Zito; Leonardo De Luca
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.