Jonathan Yap1, Fang Yi Lim2, Fei Gao1,3, Ling Li Teo2, Carolyn Su Ping Lam1,4, Khung Keong Yeo1,3. 1. Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore. 2. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 3. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore. 4. Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional status assessment is the cornerstone of heart failure management and trials. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) are commonly used tools; however, the correlation between them is not well understood. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that the relationship between the NYHA classification and 6MWD might vary across studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies reporting both NYHA class and 6MWD. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and extracted data. Thirty-seven studies involving 5678 patients were included. RESULTS: There was significant heterogeneity across studies in 6MWD within all NYHA classes: I (n = 16, Q = 934.2; P < 0.001), II (n = 25, Q = 1658.3; P < 0.001), III (n = 30, Q = 1020.1; P < 0.001), and IV (n = 6, Q = 335.5; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in average 6MWD between NYHA I and II (420 m vs 393 m; P = 0.416). There was a significant difference in average 6MWD between NYHA II and III (393 m vs 321 m; P = 0.014) and III and IV (321 m vs 224 m; P = 0.027). This remained significant after adjusting for region of study, age, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an inverse correlation between NYHA II-IV and 6MWD, there is significant heterogeneity across studies in 6MWD within each NYHA class and overlap in 6MWD between NYHA I and II. The NYHA classification performs well in more symptomatic patients (NYHA III/IV) but less so in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients (NYHA I/II). Nonetheless, the NYHA classification is an easily applied first-line tool in everyday clinical practice, but its potential subjectivity should be considered when performing comparisons across studies.
BACKGROUND: Functional status assessment is the cornerstone of heart failure management and trials. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) are commonly used tools; however, the correlation between them is not well understood. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that the relationship between the NYHA classification and 6MWD might vary across studies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies reporting both NYHA class and 6MWD. Two reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and extracted data. Thirty-seven studies involving 5678 patients were included. RESULTS: There was significant heterogeneity across studies in 6MWD within all NYHA classes: I (n = 16, Q = 934.2; P < 0.001), II (n = 25, Q = 1658.3; P < 0.001), III (n = 30, Q = 1020.1; P < 0.001), and IV (n = 6, Q = 335.5; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in average 6MWD between NYHA I and II (420 m vs 393 m; P = 0.416). There was a significant difference in average 6MWD between NYHA II and III (393 m vs 321 m; P = 0.014) and III and IV (321 m vs 224 m; P = 0.027). This remained significant after adjusting for region of study, age, and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an inverse correlation between NYHA II-IV and 6MWD, there is significant heterogeneity across studies in 6MWD within each NYHA class and overlap in 6MWD between NYHA I and II. The NYHA classification performs well in more symptomatic patients (NYHA III/IV) but less so in asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients (NYHA I/II). Nonetheless, the NYHA classification is an easily applied first-line tool in everyday clinical practice, but its potential subjectivity should be considered when performing comparisons across studies.
Authors: Merce Faraudo; Paola Beltran; Roman Freixa; Elisabet Mena; Olga Guri; Anna Contra; Luís Miguel Ceresuela; Josep Masip Journal: Eur Cardiol Date: 2017-12
Authors: Janice Huang; Barry J McDonnell; Justin S Lawley; Jessica Byrd; Eric J Stöhr; William K Cornwell Journal: Exerc Sport Sci Rev Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 6.642
Authors: Javier Roibal Pravio; Eduardo Barge Caballero; Cayetana Barbeito Caamaño; Maria Jesus Paniagua Martin; Gonzalo Barge Caballero; David Couto Mallon; Patricia Pardo Martinez; Zulaika Grille Cancela; Paula Blanco Canosa; Jose Manuel García Pinilla; Jose Manuel Vázquez Rodríguez; Maria Generosa Crespo Leiro Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-03-27
Authors: Kanokwan Bunsawat; Stephen M Ratchford; Jeremy K Alpenglow; Soung Hun Park; Catherine L Jarrett; Josef Stehlik; Adam S Smith; Russell S Richardson; D Walter Wray Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-11-19