Literature DB >> 26442140

Modelling cavitation erosion using fluid-material interaction simulations.

Georges L Chahine1, Chao-Tsung Hsiao1.   

Abstract

Material deformation and pitting from cavitation bubble collapse is investigated using fluid and material dynamics and their interaction. In the fluid, a novel hybrid approach, which links a boundary element method and a compressible finite difference method, is used to capture non-spherical bubble dynamics and resulting liquid pressures efficiently and accurately. The bubble dynamics is intimately coupled with a finite-element structure model to enable fluid/structure interaction simulations. Bubble collapse loads the material with high impulsive pressures, which result from shock waves and bubble re-entrant jet direct impact on the material surface. The shock wave loading can be from the re-entrant jet impact on the opposite side of the bubble, the fast primary collapse of the bubble, and/or the collapse of the remaining bubble ring. This produces high stress waves, which propagate inside the material, cause deformation, and eventually failure. A permanent deformation or pit is formed when the local equivalent stresses exceed the material yield stress. The pressure loading depends on bubble dynamics parameters such as the size of the bubble at its maximum volume, the bubble standoff distance from the material wall and the pressure driving the bubble collapse. The effects of standoff and material type on the pressure loading and resulting pit formation are highlighted and the effects of bubble interaction on pressure loading and material deformation are preliminarily discussed.

Keywords:  bubble dynamics; cavitation; erosion; fluid and material interaction

Year:  2015        PMID: 26442140      PMCID: PMC4549842          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  15 in total

1.  Erosion of artificial endothelia in vitro by pulsed ultrasound: acoustic pressure, frequency, membrane orientation and microbubble contrast agent dependence.

Authors:  A A Brayman; L M Lizotte; M W Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Cavitation bubble dynamics.

Authors:  W Lauterborn; C D Ohl
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.491

3.  Disinfection of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria using DynaJets® hydrodynamic cavitating jets.

Authors:  Gregory Loraine; Georges Chahine; Chao-Tsung Hsiao; Jin-Keun Choi; Patrick Aley
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 7.491

Review 4.  The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James A McAteer; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.299

5.  Modeling of surface cleaning by cavitation bubble dynamics and collapse.

Authors:  Georges L Chahine; Anil Kapahi; Jin-Keun Choi; Chao-Tsung Hsiao
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 7.491

6.  Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber.

Authors:  D L Miller; R A Gies; W B Chrisler
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Bioeffects of positive and negative acoustic pressures in mice infused with microbubbles.

Authors:  D Dalecki; S Z Child; C H Raeman; C Xing; S Gracewski; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Hemolysis near an ultrasonically pulsating gas bubble.

Authors:  J A Rooney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Improved extraction of vegetable oils under high-intensity ultrasound and/or microwaves.

Authors:  Giancarlo Cravotto; Luisa Boffa; Stefano Mantegna; Patrizia Perego; Milvio Avogadro; Pedro Cintas
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 7.491

10.  Kidney damage and renal functional changes are minimized by waveform control that suppresses cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Andrew P Evan; Lynn R Willis; James A McAteer; Michael R Bailey; Bret A Connors; Youzhi Shao; James E Lingeman; James C Williams; Naomi S Fineberg; Lawrence A Crum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  High-speed video microscopy and numerical modeling of bubble dynamics near a surface of urinary stone.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; William M Behnke-Parks; Kevin Schmidmayer; Kazuki Maeda; Tim Colonius; Thomas W Kenny; Daniel J Laser
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cavitation bubble interaction with compliant structures on a microscale: A contribution to the understanding of bacterial cell lysis by cavitation treatment.

Authors:  Jure Zevnik; Matevž Dular
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 9.336

3.  Hydrodynamic cavitation efficiently inactivates potato virus Y in water.

Authors:  Arijana Filipić; Tadeja Lukežič; Katarina Bačnik; Maja Ravnikar; Meta Ješelnik; Tamara Košir; Martin Petkovšek; Mojca Zupanc; Matevž Dular; Ion Gutierrez Aguirre
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 7.491

4.  Cavitation Fibrillation of Cellulose Fiber.

Authors:  Jakob D Redlinger-Pohn; Martin Petkovšek; Korneliya Gordeyeva; Mojca Zupanc; Alisa Gordeeva; Qilun Zhang; Matevž Dular; L Daniel Söderberg
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.