| Literature DB >> 26442122 |
Ta-Shen Kuan1, Yu-Ching Lin1, Wei-Chih Lien1, Pei-Chun Hsieh2, Yu-Ting Chung2, Sheng-Hsiang Lin3, Li-Wei Chou4.
Abstract
Objective. To determine whether the vasodilatation effect of monochromatic infrared photo energy (MIRE) had the potential for the treatment of myofascial trigger spot (MTrS) in rabbits. Design. A randomized-controlled animal study. Subjects. Twelve adult New Zealand rabbits. Methods. For each rabbit, a MTrS (equivalent to a myofascial trigger point in humans) in one side of the biceps femoris muscle was randomly selected for MIRE treatment (experimental side), while another MTrS in the other side (control side) received a sham treatment. The intervention consisted of a daily 40 minutes treatment, three times per week for 2 weeks. The prevalence of endplate noise (EPN) loci in the MTrS was assessed before, immediately after, and one week after the completion of the 2-week treatment. Results. MIRE could suppress the prevalence of EPN in the MTrS. The degree of reduction in EPN prevalence in the MTrS between the experimental side and the control side was significantly different immediately after MIRE treatment, but not significantly different one week after MIRE treatment. Conclusion. Our study suggests that MIRE may be a useful therapeutic option for the management of the myofascial trigger point in humans.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26442122 PMCID: PMC4579306 DOI: 10.1155/2015/816956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Diagram of the experimental protocol. EPN: endplate noise. MIRE: monochromatic infrared photo energy.
Figure 2The advancement of the recording needle electrode in an MTrS region for searching for SEA locus. MTrS: myofascial trigger spot. SEA: spontaneous electrical activity.
Figure 3The prevalence of EPN in an MTrS in the experimental side and the control side before MIRE, immediately after MIRE, one week after MIRE. EPN: endplate noise; MIRE: monochromatic infrared photo energy.
Comparison of EPN prevalence between experimental and control sides (between-group comparison) and among 3 conditions in each side (within-group comparison: before, immediately after, and one week after MIRE application).
| Before | Immediate after MIRE | One week after MIRE |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (%) | Im (%) | Diffim (%) | 1 wk (%) | Diff1 wk (%) | Pre | Pre | Im | |
| Experimental side | 21.61 ± 4.75 | 11.33 ± 2.84 | 46.14 ± 12.81 | 16.15 ± 5.59 | −52.29 ± 71.96 | 0.0005 | 0.0107 | 0.0029 |
| Control side | 16.41 ± 4.39 | 14.19 ± 4.02 | 11.48 ± 18.60 | 16.93 ± 2.39 | −28.05 ± 41.01 | 0.2891 | 0.0547 | 0.4063 |
|
| 0.0010 | 0.4697 | ||||||
EPN: endplate noise; MIRE: monochromatic infrared photo energy; Pre: % EPN prevalence before MIRE; Im: % EPN prevalence immediately after MIRE; 1 wk: % EPN prevalence one week after MIRE; Diffim: % difference between values before MIRE and values immediately after MIRE; Diff1 wk: % difference between values before MIRE and values one week after MIRE. Values are mean ± SD or p value.
aWilcoxon signed rank test of variance was used to compare the values before MIRE, values immediately after MIRE, and values one week after MIRE.
bWilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the values between the experimental side and the control side.
Figure 4Integrated hypothesis for the pathogenesis of an MTrP: a 6-step positive-feedback cycle (redrawn from Simons, 2004 [26]).