| Literature DB >> 26441676 |
Agathoklis D Passos1, Aikaterini A Mouza1, Spiros V Paras1, Christos Gogos2, Dimitrios Tziafas2.
Abstract
The need for simulation models to thoroughly test the inflammatory effects of dental materials and dentinogenic effects of specific signaling molecules has been well recognized in current dental research. The development of a model that simulates the transdentinal flow and the mass transfer mechanisms is of prime importance in terms of achieving the objectives of developing more effective treatment modalities in restorative dentistry. The present protocol study is part of an ongoing investigation on the development of a methodology that can calculate the transport rate of selected molecules inside a typical dentinal tubule. The transport rate of biological molecules has been investigated using a validated CFD code. In that framework we propose a simple algorithm that, given the type of molecules of the therapeutic agent and the maximum acceptable time for the drug concentration to attain a required value at the pulpal side of the tubules, can estimate the initial concentration to be imposed.Entities:
Keywords: CFD; bioactive molecules; dentin regeneration; dentinal tubule; transdentinal diffusion; μ-LIF
Year: 2015 PMID: 26441676 PMCID: PMC4584931 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1μ-LIF experimental setup.
Figure 2Test-section connected with a syringe pump.
Figure 3Comparison of CFD data with the corresponding results from the LIF technique: (A) mass concentration distribution inside the capillary after .
Figure 4Concentration distribution of a diffusate in a cylindrical μ-tube. Comparison between CFD data and the corresponding results from Equation (3) for: (A) t = 0.5 h and (B) t = 3.5 h after the diffusate release.
Representative traditional or experimental applications in the situation of exposed dentinal surfaces with the characteristics of released molecules or ions.
| Composite resins-tooth restoration | TEGDMA Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate | CH2 = C(CH3)COO(CH2CH2O)3COC(CH3) = CH2 | 286 | 7.5·10−10 |
| Bonding agents-tooth restoration | HEMA 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate | CH2 = C(CH3)COOCH2CH2OH Polymer absorbing up to 600% water. Basically it is hydrophobic but contains hydrophilic group. | 130 | 9.7·10−10 |
| Glass ionomer cements- pulp protection | Fluoride ions | F− | 9 | 2.4·10−09 |
| Zinc oxide-eugenol bases-pulp protection | Eugenol 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenol | C10H12O2hydrophobic | 164 | 8.9·10−10 |
| Calcium hydroxide-based liners-pulp protection | Calcium ions | Ca++ | 20 | 1.8·10−09 |
| Calcium silicate-based bases -pulp protection | Silicon | Si4− | 14 | 2.1·10−09 |
| EDTA-soluble dentinal constituents (experimental applications) Pulp protection | Transforming growth factor -beta | Polypeptide | 44,300 | 1.4·10−10 |
| BMP7-containing capping agents (experimental applications) pulp protection | Bone morphogenetic protein 7 | Polypeptide | 50,000 | 1.3·10−10 |
Figure 5(A) Effect of the initial substance concentration on the diffusion characteristics [t(1, 2) time needed to reach a specified concentration value at the pulp] and (B) Effect of the molecular size on the diffusion characteristics.
Figure 6Comparison of CFD results on the transdentinal diffusion of a protein (R.
Figure 7Graphical solution of Equation (6).
Critical time for C.
| TEGDMA Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate | 21 |
| HEMA 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate | 16 |
| Fluoride ions | 7 |
| Eugenol 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenol | 17 |
| Calcium ions | 9 |
| Silicon | 8 |
| Transforming growth factor -beta | 113 |
| Bone morphogenetic protein 7 | 118 |