Literature DB >> 26441481

Stakeholder Perceptions of Risk in Construction.

Dong Zhao1, Andrew P McCoy1, Brian M Kleiner1, Thomas H Mills1, Helen Lingard2.   

Abstract

Safety management in construction is an integral effort and its success requires inputs from all stakeholders across design and construction phases. Effective risk mitigation relies on the concordance of all stakeholders' risk perceptions. Many researchers have noticed the discordance of risk perceptions among critical stakeholders in safe construction work, however few have provided quantifiable evidence describing them. In an effort to fill this perception gap, this research performs an experiment that investigates stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction. Data analysis confirms the existence of such discordance, and indicates a trend in risk likelihood estimation. With risk perceptions from low to high, the stakeholders are architects, contractors/safety professionals, and engineers. Including prior studies, results also suggest that designers have improved their knowledge in building construction safety, but compared to builders they present more difficultly in reaching a consensus of perception. Findings of this research are intended to be used by risk management and decision makers to reassess stakeholders' varying judgments when considering injury prevention and hazard assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construction stakeholder; Experiment; Occupational safety and health; Risk management; Risk perception

Year:  2016        PMID: 26441481      PMCID: PMC4591252          DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saf Sci        ISSN: 0925-7535            Impact factor:   4.877


  8 in total

1.  Mental models of safety: do managers and employees see eye to eye?

Authors:  Gregory E Prussia; Karen A Brown; P Geoff Willis
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Macroergonomics: analysis and design of work systems.

Authors:  Brian M Kleiner
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Risk avoidance: graphs versus numbers.

Authors:  Hannah Faye Chua; J Frank Yates; Priti Shah
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Electrical deaths in the US construction: an analysis of fatality investigations.

Authors:  Dong Zhao; Walid Thabet; Andrew McCoy; Brian Kleiner
Journal:  Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot       Date:  2013-09-02

5.  The trajectories of Prevention through Design in construction.

Authors:  T Michael Toole; John Gambatese
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2008-03-20

6.  The role of design issues in work-related fatal injury in Australia.

Authors:  Timothy R Driscoll; James E Harrison; Clare Bradley; Rachel S Newson
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2008-03-13

Review 7.  Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Perception of risk.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.