Kazunori Kuwata1, Itsuko Nakamura2, Mika Ide3, Hiroko Sato1, Satomi Nishikawa1, Masaharu Tanaka1. 1. Safety Research Laboratories, Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 1-1-1 Kazusakamatari, Kisarazu, Chiba 292-0818, Japan. 2. Safety Research Laboratories, Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 2-2-50 Kawagishi, Toda, Saitama 335-8505, Japan. 3. Research Strategy & Planning Department, Research Division, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 2-2-50 Kawagishi, Toda, Saitama 335-8505, Japan.
Abstract
To investigate useful biomarkers associated with proximal tubular injury, we assessed changes in levels of a focused set of biomarkers in urine and blood. Male rats administered a single dose or four doses of gentamicin (GM, 240 mg/kg/day) or a single dose of cisplatin (CDDP, 5 mg/kg) were euthanized on days 2 (the day after initial dosing) 5, or 12. At each time point, histopathological examination of the kidney and immunohistochemistry for biomarkers, kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1), lipocalin (NGAL), clusterin (CLU), cystatin C (CysC) and β2-microglobulin (β2M) were performed. Biomarker levels were measured in urine and blood. In both treatment groups, degenerated/necrotic proximal tubules and regenerated tubules were mainly observed on days 5 and 12, respectively. At the same time as these tubular injuries, urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels were increased. Moreover, urinary levels of CysC and β2M in GM-treated animals and Kim-1 in CDDP-treated animals increased (on day 2) prior to tubular injury on day 5. This was considered to reflect the characteristics of drug toxicity. Although almost all of the biomarkers in blood were not sufficiently sensitive to detect proximal tubular injury, urinary and plasma β2M levels simultaneously increased. Therefore, in addition to urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels, plasma β2M levels were also considered useful for detecting proximal tubular injury.
To investigate useful biomarkers associated with proximal tubular injury, we assessed changes in levels of a focused set of biomarkers in urine and blood. Male rats administered a single dose or four doses of gentamicin (GM, 240 mg/kg/day) or a single dose of cisplatin (CDDP, 5 mg/kg) were euthanized on days 2 (the day after initial dosing) 5, or 12. At each time point, histopathological examination of the kidney and immunohistochemistry for biomarkers, kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1), lipocalin (NGAL), clusterin (CLU), cystatin C (CysC) and β2-microglobulin (β2M) were performed. Biomarker levels were measured in urine and blood. In both treatment groups, degenerated/necrotic proximal tubules and regenerated tubules were mainly observed on days 5 and 12, respectively. At the same time as these tubular injuries, urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels were increased. Moreover, urinary levels of CysC and β2M in GM-treated animals and Kim-1 in CDDP-treated animals increased (on day 2) prior to tubular injury on day 5. This was considered to reflect the characteristics of drug toxicity. Although almost all of the biomarkers in blood were not sufficiently sensitive to detect proximal tubular injury, urinary and plasma β2M levels simultaneously increased. Therefore, in addition to urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels, plasma β2M levels were also considered useful for detecting proximal tubular injury.
Renal injury can be fatal, making the kidney a major target organ for drug research and
development. Drug-induced renal injury represents one of the primary causes of drug failure
or adverse drug reactions (approximately 21%) in late-stage development[1], [2]. Therefore, early detection of nephrotoxicity is important for
determining the safety of drug candidates. Blood ureanitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (CRE)
are the most commonly used markers for detecting nephrotoxicity in traditional clinical
pathology. However, these markers are not very specific or sensitive, as there is usually a
significant loss of renal function before BUN and CRE levels increase[3].Several renal injury biomarkers that are more specific and sensitive than BUN or CRE have
already been reported. Regulatory authorities have judged 8 biomarkers—β2-microglobulin
(β2M), clusterin (CLU), cystatin C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (Kim-1), albumin (ALB),
urinary total protein (TP), trefoil factor 3 and renal papillary antigen-1—as acceptable for
the detection of acute drug-induced renal toxicity and for providing additional and
complementary information not available with the currently available standard parameters in
specified contexts of nonclinical development[4],[5],[6],[7]. Moreover,
urinary alpha-glutathione S-transferase, mu-glutathione S-transferase, lipocalin (NGAL), and
osteopontin have also been recognized as candidate biomarkers for nephrotoxicity[8],[9],[10].Proximal tubular injury is the most frequent drug-induced renal injury because a high
number of xenobiotics are reabsorbed and excreted by proximal tubules[11]. Glomerular injury also leads to proximal
tubular injury because persistent albuminuria following glomerular injury is harmful to
renal tubular cells[12]. Therefore,
detection of proximal tubule injury may provide a sensitive way to monitor most, but not
all, renal toxicities. Gentamicin (GM) and/or cisplatin (CDDP) are often used to
experimentally induce nephrotoxicity when investigating the usefulness and characteristics
of biomarkers that detect proximal tubular injury. GM damages proximal convoluted tubules
[S1 and S2 segments][13]; CDDP primarily
damages proximal straight tubules [S3 segments][14].Biomarkers are usually examined in the urine because urine is readily accessible and
repeated measurements can be obtained for individual animals/humans. This allows the
investigator to track the onset and progression of a renal injury and recovery from it. In
addition to examination in urine, biomarkers are also examined in blood
(serum/plasma)[15],[16],[17]. Most studies that have evaluated blood biomarkers have been
performed in humans, few studies have evaluated blood biomarkers in animals[18]. Nonetheless, evaluation of blood biomarkers
in animals is convenient because blood collection can be routinely performed in preclinical
studies. However, evaluation of either urinary or blood biomarkers provides limited
information regarding the part of the nephron that is injured and involved with changes in
biomarker levels. Tissue-based assays, such as immunohistochemistry, are important to
confirm the origin of a biomarker and its relationship with a histopathological change.Recently, there have been various reports that have compared urinary biomarkers with
immunohistochemistry for biomarkers in rat models of proximal tubular injury[19],[20],[21]. However, there are a few reports that have evaluated blood biomarkers in
correlation with proximal tubular injury in rat models. Moreover, there are no detailed
reports integrating the changes in the biomarker levels using urine-based, blood-based and
tissue-based approaches. Therefore, to investigate useful biomarkers in urine and blood,
which could detect renal injury, we determined the time course changes in levels of a
focused set of five biomarkers (Kim-1, NGAL, CLU, CysC and β2M) that can reflect proximal
tubular injury[3] in urine, blood and kidney
tissues from GM- or CDDP-treated rats.
Material and Methods
Animals and experimental design
All procedures were performed after approval of the study by the Institutional Animal
Care and Use Committee of Mitsubishi Tanabe Research Laboratories. Male Crl:CD(SD) rats
were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Kanagawa, Japan). The animals were
maintained under controlled conditions (12-h light/dark cycle, temperature of 23 ± 3°C,
relative humidity of 50 ± 20%) and were given free access to food (autoclaved CRF-1,
Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and tap water. Seventy-two animals were allocated
to following three groups of 24 animals each: a saline-treated group (control), a
GM-treated group (GM group) and a CDDP-treated group (CDDP group). The animals were 6
weeks old at the time of GM or CDDP administration.GM (240 mg/kg body weight; 5 mL/kg), CDDP (5 mg/kg body weight; 2 mL/kg) or saline was
administered intraperitoneally. Dosages were determined based on previous
reports[22], [23] and a preliminary examination; we evaluated
the kidney after slight injury, severe injury and recovery from injury at each time point.
Twelve animals in each group were euthanized on day 2 after administration of a single
dose; the day of initiation of administration was designated as day 1. Six animals after
administration of GM for 4 days or administration of a single dose of CDDP were euthanized
on days 5 or 12, respectively. Two animals in the CDDP group euthanized on day 12 were
excluded from this study because of a dosing error.
Urinalysis and blood chemistry
The animals in all groups were housed individually in stainless steel metabolic cages for
approximately 24 h, and urine was sampled using the following schedule: days 1–2, animals
euthanized on day 2; days 4–5, animals euthanized on days 5 and 12; days 11–12, animals
euthanized on day 12.At necropsy, blood was collected from the postcava under anesthesia with an
intraperitoneal injection of thiopental sodium (Ravonal®; Mitsubishi Tanabe
Pharma Corporation). Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 4°C. Plasma samples
were obtained after centrifugation at 4°C using a test tube containing dipotassium EDTA.
These samples were stored in a freezer at −90 to −70°C until analysis.Measurements of serum items, including CRE (Serotec, Tokyo, Japan) and BUN (Shino-Test,
Tokyo, Japan), were performed using an automatic analyzer (Hitachi High-Technologies
Corporation., Tokyo, Japan). Measurements of urinary and serum CysC (Mitsubishi Chemical
Medience, Tokyo, Japan) were also performed using this analyzer. Measurements of urinary
and plasma Kim-1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), NGAL (BioPorto Diagnostics,
Gentofte, Denmark), CLU (Life Diagnostics, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA) and β2M
(Mitsubishi Chemical Medience) were performed using commercial ELISA kits.Urinary data are shown as total urinary excretion measured over 24 h of collection.
Urinary biomarker levels were not normalized to the contemporaneous urine creatinine level
because urinary creatinine excretion in the setting of acute kidney injury is dynamic and
its inclusion in the assessment of urinary biomarkers has been challenged[24].
Histopathology
Animals were exsanguinated by severing the abdominal aorta and postcava after blood
collection, and then the kidneys were harvested. After fixing in 10% neutral buffered
formalin, cross sections of the kidney showing papilla were dehydrated and embedded in
paraffin. Paraffin sections (4 µm thick) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Then,
unblinded evaluation of the sections was performed.
Immunohistochemistry
Deparaffinized sections were incubated with 3% H2O2 in distilled
water for 10 min and with Block Ace (Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) for
30 min at room temperature. Then, sections were incubated at 4°C for 16 h with primary
antibodies. Details of the primary antibodies used are summarized in Table 1. Following incubation with Histofine Simple Stain
MAX PO (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min at room temperature, sections were developed
using 0.05% 3,3-diaminobenzidine/H2O2 as the chromogen. All
immunostained slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Table
1.
Primary Antibodies Used in this
Study
Grading of immunoreactivity was performed as follows: −, negative; +, positive for a
small area of tubular epithelium in the renal cortex or medulla; ++, positive for a large
area of tubular epithelium in the renal cortex or medulla; +++, positive for a large area
of tubular epithelium in both the renal cortex and medulla.
Statistical analysis
A two-tailed Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was employed for statistical evaluation
of differences between control and treatment groups at a significance level of 5%. Blood
chemistry and urinalysis values tended to show a log-normal distribution; therefore, a
logarithmic transformation was conducted before employing Dunnett’s multiple comparison
test. Values below the lower limit of quantification were regarded as half the lower limit
of quantification for conducting logarithmic transformations.Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear
association between the urinary and blood levels of each biomarker.
Results
GM group
The results of histopathological examination following GM treatment are presented in
Table 2. There were no histopathological findings on day 2
(the day after administration of a single dose). Eosinophilic globules and
degeneration/necrosis were noted in the proximal convoluted tubules in the cortex on day 5
(Fig. 1a), and
regeneration of the tubules subsequently occurred on day 12 (7 days after administration
for 4 days; Fig. 1b). On day 12, dilatation of
proximal tubules over the cortex and the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) was
observed in one animal (Fig. 1c). Although
histopathological changes were observed from day 5, BUN and CRE were significantly
increased only on day 12 (Table 3).
Urinary TP and ALB levels were significantly increased from days 2 to 5 (Table 3).
Table
2.
Histopathological Findings in the Kidney after Receiving GM
or CDDP
Fig. 1.
Histopathological findings in the kidneys of rats following GM or CDDP
administration. The following findings were obtained in the GM group: eoshinophilic
globules in and degeneration/necrosis of the proximal convoluted tubular epithelium
in the cortex on day 5 (a), regeneration of the proximal convoluted tubular
epithelium in the cortex on day 12 (b) and dilatation of the proximal tubule over
the cortex and OSOM on day 12 (c). The following findings were observed in the CDDP
group: nuclear chromatin margination of the proximal straight tubular epithelium
(arrow) in the OSOM on day 2 (d) and degeneration/necrosis, regeneration,
karyomegaly (arrow head) of the proximal straight tubular epithelium in the OSOM on
day 5 (e) and day 12 (f). Hematoxylin and eosin staining. Bar = 50 μm (a, d, e, f),
100 μm (b, c).
Table 3.
Blood Chemistry and Urinalysis
Parameters Except for Focused Biomarkers
Histopathological findings in the kidneys of rats following GM or CDDP
administration. The following findings were obtained in the GM group: eoshinophilic
globules in and degeneration/necrosis of the proximal convoluted tubular epithelium
in the cortex on day 5 (a), regeneration of the proximal convoluted tubular
epithelium in the cortex on day 12 (b) and dilatation of the proximal tubule over
the cortex and OSOM on day 12 (c). The following findings were observed in the CDDP
group: nuclear chromatin margination of the proximal straight tubular epithelium
(arrow) in the OSOM on day 2 (d) and degeneration/necrosis, regeneration,
karyomegaly (arrow head) of the proximal straight tubular epithelium in the OSOM on
day 5 (e) and day 12 (f). Hematoxylin and eosin staining. Bar = 50 μm (a, d, e, f),
100 μm (b, c).On day 12, it was found that the TP and ALB levels had recovered to within the control
range, except for the animal with dilatation of the proximal tubules observed in
histopathology; this animal showed extremely high TP and ALB levels (17.2 mg and 107.0 μg,
respectively). It also showed extremely high levels of the following biomarkers: urinary
and plasma Kim-1 (723.9 ng and 1675.1 pg/mL, respectively) and urinary NGAL (28998.6 ng),
CLU (13182.4 ng) and CysC (19.68 μg).(1) Kim-1: The urinary Kim-1 level was significantly increased on days 5 and 12, whereas
the plasma Kim-1 level was increased only on day 12 (Fig. 2a, b). Although the
plasma Kim-1 levels increased after the urinary Kim-1 levels, the two were strongly
correlated [coefficient of correlation (R) = 0.96, P<0.01; Fig. 3a], and both the
levels of urinary and plasma Kim-1 increased from day 5 to 12.
Fig. 2.
Time course of the appearance of urinary
and blood biomarkers in rats given a single administration or 4 administrations of
gentamicin (GM, 240 mg/kg/day), rats given a single administration of cisplatin
(CDDP, 5 mg/kg) or rats used as the vehicle control. The urinary and serum/plasma
levels of Kim-1(a, b), NGAL (c, d), CLU (e, f), CysC (g, h) and β2M (i, j) were
assayed at the indicated time points (the day after initial dosing shown as day 2).
Individual data and mean values are expressed. The sample numbers were as follows: n
= 12 for urinalysis on days 2 and 5 and blood analysis on day 2, except for the CDDP
group (n = 10 for urinalysis on day 5), and n = 6 for urinalysis on day 12 and blood
analysis on days 5 and 12, except for the CDDP group (n = 4 for urinalysis and blood
analysis on day 12). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01
vs. control group (two-tailed Dunnett’s multiple comparison
test).
Fig. 3.
Relationship between
the urinary and serum/plasma levels of biomarkers. Pearson’s product-moment
correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the
urinary and blood levels of each biomarker. Kim-1 (GM group, coefficient of
correlation (R) = 0.96, P<0.01; CDDP group, R=0.71,
P<0.01) (a), NGAL (GM group, R=0.89,
P<0.01; CDDP group, R=0.95, P<0.01) (b), CLU
(GM group, R=0.10, P=0.65; CDDP group, R=0.60,
P<0.01) (c), CysC (GM group, R=0.25, P=0.26,
CDDP group, R=0.40, P=0.07) (d), β2M (GM group, R=0.33,
P=0.13, CDDP group, R=0.68, P<0.01)
(e).
Time course of the appearance of urinary
and blood biomarkers in rats given a single administration or 4 administrations of
gentamicin (GM, 240 mg/kg/day), rats given a single administration of cisplatin
(CDDP, 5 mg/kg) or rats used as the vehicle control. The urinary and serum/plasma
levels of Kim-1(a, b), NGAL (c, d), CLU (e, f), CysC (g, h) and β2M (i, j) were
assayed at the indicated time points (the day after initial dosing shown as day 2).
Individual data and mean values are expressed. The sample numbers were as follows: n
= 12 for urinalysis on days 2 and 5 and blood analysis on day 2, except for the CDDP
group (n = 10 for urinalysis on day 5), and n = 6 for urinalysis on day 12 and blood
analysis on days 5 and 12, except for the CDDP group (n = 4 for urinalysis and blood
analysis on day 12). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01
vs. control group (two-tailed Dunnett’s multiple comparison
test).Relationship between
the urinary and serum/plasma levels of biomarkers. Pearson’s product-moment
correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the linear association between the
urinary and blood levels of each biomarker. Kim-1 (GM group, coefficient of
correlation (R) = 0.96, P<0.01; CDDP group, R=0.71,
P<0.01) (a), NGAL (GM group, R=0.89,
P<0.01; CDDP group, R=0.95, P<0.01) (b), CLU
(GM group, R=0.10, P=0.65; CDDP group, R=0.60,
P<0.01) (c), CysC (GM group, R=0.25, P=0.26,
CDDP group, R=0.40, P=0.07) (d), β2M (GM group, R=0.33,
P=0.13, CDDP group, R=0.68, P<0.01)
(e).The results of immunohistochemistry following GM treatment are presented in Table 4. Kim-1 immunoreactivity was absent
in control animals at every time point. In GM-treated animals, Kim-1 immunoreactivity was
detected in a part of the proximal convoluted tubules in a nephron that displayed
eosinophilic globules or degeneration/necrosis on day 5 (Fig. 4a). Kim-1
immunoreactivity was also detected in both the regenerated tubules (Fig. 4b) and dilated tubules on day 12 (Fig. 4c).
Table
4.
Immunohistochemistry in the Kidney after Administration of
GM or CDDP
Fig. 4.
Kim-1
immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following administration of GM or CDDP.
Kim-1 immunoreactivity in a part of the proximal convoluted tubules in a nephron on
day 5 (a), regenerated tubules on day 12 (b) and dilated tubules on day 12 (c) in
the GM group. Kim-1 immunoreactivity in a few proximal straight tubules in the OSOM
on day 2 (d) and the immunoreactivity in degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules
on day 5 (e) and day 12 (f) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm
(a–f).
Kim-1
immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following administration of GM or CDDP.
Kim-1 immunoreactivity in a part of the proximal convoluted tubules in a nephron on
day 5 (a), regenerated tubules on day 12 (b) and dilated tubules on day 12 (c) in
the GM group. Kim-1 immunoreactivity in a few proximal straight tubules in the OSOM
on day 2 (d) and the immunoreactivity in degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules
on day 5 (e) and day 12 (f) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm
(a–f).(2) NGAL: The urinary NGAL levels on days 5 and 12 were increased and showed equal
values, although the increase on day 5 was not statistically significant (Fig. 2c). Although the urinary NGAL levels were
showed a strong correlation with the plasma levels (R=0.89, P<0.01;
Fig. 3b), the plasma NGAL were not increased
in majority of the animals at any time point (Fig.
2d).NGAL immunoreactivity was absent in control animals at every time point. NGAL
immunoreactivity in GM-treated animal was similar to that of Kim-1. However, the
immunoreactivity was observed sporadically with granular staining in a part of the
proximal convoluted tubules that displayed eosinophilic globules or degeneration/necrosis
on day 5 (Fig. 5a). NGAL immunoreactivity was also detected in
a few regenerated tubules (Fig. 5b) and a part
of the dilated tubules on day 12 (Fig. 5c).
Fig. 5.
NGAL
immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following administration of GM or CDDP.
NGAL immunoreactivity in a part of the proximal convoluted tubules sporadically on
day 5 (a) and in a few regenerated tubules (b) and a part of dilated tubules on day
12 (c) in the GM group. NGAL immunoreactivity in a few proximal straight tubules in
the OSOM on day 2 (d) and in degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules and their
lumens on day 5 (e) and in a few degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules on day
12 (f) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm (a–f).
NGAL
immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following administration of GM or CDDP.
NGAL immunoreactivity in a part of the proximal convoluted tubules sporadically on
day 5 (a) and in a few regenerated tubules (b) and a part of dilated tubules on day
12 (c) in the GM group. NGAL immunoreactivity in a few proximal straight tubules in
the OSOM on day 2 (d) and in degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules and their
lumens on day 5 (e) and in a few degenerate/necrotic and regenerated tubules on day
12 (f) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm (a–f).(3) CLU: The urinary CLU levels were significantly increased only on day 12, but the
plasma CLU levels showed no increase at any time point (Fig. 2e, f). In addition, there was no significant correlation between urinary
and plasma CLU levels (R=0.10, P=0.65; Fig. 3c).CLU immunoreactivity was absent in control animals at every time point. CLU
immunoreactivity in the GM-treated group was also absent on days 2 and 5, but it was
detected in a few normal distal tubules (Fig.
6a) and a part of the dilated tubules on day 12
(Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6.
CLU immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats
following administration of GM or CDDP. CLU immunoreactivity in a few normal distal
tubules in the cortex (a) and in a part of the dilated tubules on day 12 (b) in the
GM group. CLU immunoreactivity in a part of degenerate/necrotic tubules and lumens
of normal tubules in the medulla (c) and the distal tubules over the cortex to
medulla on day 5 (d) and in a few degenerate/necrotic tubules in the medulla on day
12 (e) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm (a, b), 200 μm (c–e).
CLU immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats
following administration of GM or CDDP. CLU immunoreactivity in a few normal distal
tubules in the cortex (a) and in a part of the dilated tubules on day 12 (b) in the
GM group. CLU immunoreactivity in a part of degenerate/necrotic tubules and lumens
of normal tubules in the medulla (c) and the distal tubules over the cortex to
medulla on day 5 (d) and in a few degenerate/necrotic tubules in the medulla on day
12 (e) in the CDDP group. Bar = 100 μm (a, b), 200 μm (c–e).(4) CysC: The urinary CysC levels significantly increased on days 2 and 5 (Fig. 2g); however, the serum CysC levels showed no
increase at any time point (Fig. 2g, h) and no
significant correlation with the urinary levels (R=0.25, P=0.26; Fig. 3d). The urinary CysC levels increased from
days 2 to 5. The increased mean urinary CysC level on day 12 was considered to reflect the
data from the animal with proximal tubule dilatation because the CysC levels of the other
animals were similar to the levels of the control animals.CysC immunoreactivity was present in the proximal convoluted tubules in control animals
at every time point (Fig. 7a). In the kidney
of the GM-treated animals on day 5, CysC immunoreactivity was more evident than that in
the control animals, displaying the strongest intensity in the proximal convoluted tubules
(Fig. 7b) In addition to this area, CysC
immunoreactivity was detected in a part of the dilated tubules on day 12 (Fig. 7c).
Fig.
7.
CysC immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following
administration of GM, CDDP or a vehicle control. CysC immunoreactivity in the
proximal convoluted tubules in control animals on day 5 (a, d). CysC
immunoreactivity with a strong intensity in the proximal convoluted tubules of rats
on day 5 (b) and immunoreactivity in a part of dilated tubules in addition to the
proximal convoluted tubules on day 12 (c) in the GM group. CysC immunoreactivity in
a part of the tubules including degenerated/necrotic and regenerated tubules and the
tubular lumens of the medulla on day 5 (e). Bar = 200 μm (a, b, c), 400 μm (d,
e).
CysC immunohistochemistry in the kidneys of rats following
administration of GM, CDDP or a vehicle control. CysC immunoreactivity in the
proximal convoluted tubules in control animals on day 5 (a, d). CysC
immunoreactivity with a strong intensity in the proximal convoluted tubules of rats
on day 5 (b) and immunoreactivity in a part of dilated tubules in addition to the
proximal convoluted tubules on day 12 (c) in the GM group. CysC immunoreactivity in
a part of the tubules including degenerated/necrotic and regenerated tubules and the
tubular lumens of the medulla on day 5 (e). Bar = 200 μm (a, b, c), 400 μm (d,
e).(5) β2M: The urinary β2M levels were significantly increased at every time point, whereas
the plasma β2M levels were significantly increased on days 2 and 5 (Fig. 2i, j). Both the urinary and plasma β2M levels increased from
days 2 to 5 and decreased from days 5 to 12, although no significant correlation was
observed (R=0.33, P=0.13; Fig.
3e).β2M immunoreactivity was observed in the proximal convoluted tubules in the control
animals (Fig. 8), and
the immunoreactivity was not affected by GM administration.
Fig. 8.
β2M
immunoreactivity in the proximal convoluted tubules of a control animal on day 5.
Bar = 200 μm.
β2M
immunoreactivity in the proximal convoluted tubules of a control animal on day 5.
Bar = 200 μm.
CDDP group
The results of histopathological examination following CDDP treatment are presented in
Table 2. On day 2, nuclear chromatin
margination was observed in the proximal straight tubule in the OSOM (Fig. 1d). On day 5, degeneration/necrosis and regeneration of the
proximal straight tubule and karyomegaly in the proximal straight tubule were observed in
the OSOM (Fig. 1e). Although the majority of
these changes were still observed on day 12, the degenerated/necrotic areas began to be
replaced by regenerated tubules (Fig. 1f)
accompanied by slight dilatation. The BUN, CRE, ALB and TP levels showed significant
increases mainly on day 5, and the levels on day 12 were similar to those of the control
levels (Table 3).(1) Kim-1: The urinary Kim-1 levels significantly increased at every point (Fig. 2a). The plasma Kim-1 level was significantly
increased on days 5 and 12 (Fig. 2b). The plasma
Kim-1 levels showed a strong correlation with the urinary levels (R=0.71,
P<0.01; Fig. 3a). The
urinary and plasma Kim-1 levels increased from days 2 to 5 and remained at high levels
until day 12.The results of immunohistochemistry following CDDP treatment are presented in Table 4. Kim-1 immunoreactivity was detected in a
few proximal straight tubules on day 2 (Fig.
4d). This immunoreactivity corresponded poorly with that of the lesion with nuclear
chromatin margination. Kim-1 immunoreactivity was also detected in the
degenerated/necrotic and regenerated tubules on days 5 and 12, respectively (Fig. 4e, f).(2) NGAL: There were no apparent increases in the urinary and plasma NGAL levels at any
time point (Fig. 2c, d), although the urinary
and plasma levels showed correlation (R=0.95, P<0.01; Fig. 3b).NGAL immunoreactivity was detected in a few proximal straight tubules in the OSOM on day
2 (Fig. 5d). Similar to Kim-1, NGAL
immunoreactivity corresponded poorly with that of the lesion with nuclear chromatin
margination. NGAL immunoreactivity was also detected in degenerated/necrotic and
regenerated tubules on days 5 and 12, respectively, and their lumens on day 5 (Fig. 5e, f). The intensity of immunoreactivity
decreased from days 5 to 12.(3) CLU: The urinary CLU levels increased on days 5 and 12, although the increase on day
12 was not significant (Fig. 2e, f). Plasma CLU
levels were also increased on day 5 and then decreased from days 5 to 12. The urinary and
plasma CLU levels showed moderate correlation (R=0.60, P<0.01; Fig. 3c).CLU immunoreactivity was detected in a part of the degenerated/necrotic tubules in the
OSOM on days 5 and 12 (Fig. 6c, e), and the
intensity of immunoreactivity decreased from days 5 to 12. CLU immunoreactivity was also
observed in the lumens of normal tubules in the medulla and in the normal distal tubules
over the medulla and cortex on day 5 (Fig. 6c,
d).(4) CysC: Urinary CysC levels significantly increased on day 5; however, serum CysC
levels did not change at any time point (Fig. 2g,
h) and did not correlate with the urinary levels (R=0.40,
P=0.07; Fig. 3d).CysC immunoreactivity was present in the proximal convoluted tubules in the cortex of the
kidneys of control animals (Fig. 7d).
CDDP-treated animals showed additional CysC immunoreactivity in a part of the tubules
including degenerated/necrotic and regenerated tubules and the tubular lumens of the
medulla on days 5 (Fig. 7e) and 12.(5) β2M: Urinary and plasma levels of β2M significantly increased on day 5 (Fig. 2f, j), and they were moderately correlated
(R=0.68, P<0.01; Fig.3e).In immunohistochemistry, there was no significant difference between control and
CDDP-treated animals.
Discussion
To investigate useful biomarkers that can detect proximal tubular injury, we determined the
time course changes in levels of five biomarkers (Kim-1, NGAL, CLU, CysC and β2M) in urine
and blood. Immunohistochemical analysis for these biomarkers was also performed to confirm
the association between histopathological injury and biomarker behaviors in the kidney.
Overall results are summarized in Table
5.
Table 5.
Summary of the
Changes in Histopathology and Biomarkers
This study suggested that urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels are especially useful for
detecting proximal tubular injury. Although urinary levels of all five biomarkers are known
to reflect a proximal tubular injury[3], NGAL
and CLU did not increase in association with degeneration/necrosis of the proximal tubule
(on day 5) in GM and/or CDDP groups. Moreover, the changes in the urinary CysC and β2M
levels were considered to successfully represent the time course changes in histopathology;
the increased levels of these biomarkers accompanying histological injury (on day 5)
returned to close to the control range in the recovery phase (on day 12).
Immunohistochemical analysis was useful in confirming the association of proximal tubular
injury with urinary levels of Kim-1 but not with urinary levels of CysC and β2M. The
immunoreactivity patterns of CysC changed in both GM- and CDDP-treated animals and resembled
those in the past reports[25],
[26]; however, the changes in CysC
immunoreactivity did not correlate with the time of increase of CysC levels in urine, and no
change in β2M immunoreactivity was observed in any of the treated animals in this study.We also revealed that urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels increased prior to
degeneration/necrosis of the proximal tubule, depending on the toxicity characteristics of
the treatment. In the GM group, the CysC and β2M levels markedly increased on day 2 without
any histopathological findings. CysC and β2M are low-molecular-weight proteins that are
almost completely filtered from the blood in the glomerulus, and the filtered CysC and β2M
are reabsorbed and metabolized by the proximal convoluted tubules[3], [11]. An increase in the urinary levels of these biomarkers indicates impaired
tubular reabsorption, reflecting renal tubular injury or protein overload, such as that from
glomerular injury[11], [27]. In addition, polycationic drugs such as GM
increase the glomerular filtration of large anionic proteins, such as albumin, through a
change in electrical charge[11],
[28]. Coupled with the increase of
TP and ALB levels observed at the same time point, the increase in urinary CysC and β2M
levels without histopathological findings suggests the impairment of tubular reabsorption
resulting from protein overload, not proximal tubular injury. On the other hand, urinary
Kim-1 levels significantly increased on day 2 before degeneration/necrosis of the proximal
tubule in the CDDP group. In the case of CDDP, proximal tubular injury begins with oxidative
damage of cellular components[14]; thus, the
levels of Kim-1, which is expressed in the injured renal tubular epithelial
membrane[29], [30], changed first, reflecting cytotoxicity. As
for the nuclear margination observed at the same time point, its involvement in the changes
in urinary Kim-1 levels was not completely understood because of the inconsistency between
the lesion and immunoreactivity. However, considering that both of them were observed in the
same area, nuclear margination may be the histopathological event that leads to
degeneration/necrosis of the proximal tubule.We revealed that both urinary and plasma β2M are sufficiently sensitive in detecting
proximal tubular injury. Notably, plasma β2M levels increased in a manner similar to urinary
β2M level, although the magnitude of the changes was not perfectly correlated in terms of
individual values. According to several reports from human studies, increased β2M levels in
blood correlate with a decreased glomerular filtration rate[31], [32], whereas increased β2M levels in urine correlate with the an impairment
of tubular reabsorption[11],
[27]11, 27. Therefore, the plasma
β2M level is considered to reflect a decreased glomerular filtration rate in parallel with a
proximal tubular injury, although the relationship between the urinary and plasma β2M levels
is still not completely understood.In contrast, serum CysC, which has characteristics similar to those of β2M, did not change
at any time point. This may be because of the difference in the measuring method:
measurement with an autoanalyzer could not detect the changes in serum CysC levels because
the sensitivity of the autoanalyzer was lower than that of commercial ELISA kits.It was also noteworthy that plasma Kim-1 levels revealed good associations with urinary
Kim-1 levels, although the sensitivity of plasma Kim-1 was inferior to that of urinary
Kim-1. A recent study reported that plasma Kim-1 levels increased after GM treatment in
rats[18]. Although the exact mechanism
of the increase in blood Kim-1 levels remains unclear, it may be due to its direct leakage
into the blood circulation because disturbance of cell polarity or permeability could occur
after proximal tubular injury.In conclusion, this study suggested that urinary Kim-1, CysC and β2M levels are useful
biomarkers for detecting proximal tubular injury because an increase in them is accompanied
by degeneration/necrosis of the proximal tubule, and an increase in them was also observed
prior to degeneration/necrosis depending on the toxicity characteristics. Moreover, we
revealed that not only urinary biomarker levels but also plasma β2M levels are useful for
detecting proximal tubular injury because the latter increased in a manner similar to that
observed for urinary β2M levels. Although the increase in plasma β2M levels was considered
to reflect the decrease in glomerular filtration rate rather than the direct effect of a
proximal tubular injury, plasma β2M levels could be an alternative biomarker in preclinical
studies in cases where urine samples are unavailable.
Authors: Frank Dieterle; Elias Perentes; André Cordier; Daniel R Roth; Pablo Verdes; Olivier Grenet; Serafino Pantano; Pierre Moulin; Daniel Wahl; Andreas Mahl; Peter End; Frank Staedtler; François Legay; Kevin Carl; David Laurie; Salah-Dine Chibout; Jacky Vonderscher; Gérard Maurer Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Josef S Ozer; Frank Dieterle; Sean Troth; Elias Perentes; André Cordier; Pablo Verdes; Frank Staedtler; Andreas Mahl; Olivier Grenet; Daniel R Roth; Daniel Wahl; François Legay; Daniel Holder; Zoltan Erdos; Katerina Vlasakova; Hong Jin; Yan Yu; Nagaraja Muniappa; Tom Forest; Holly K Clouse; Spencer Reynolds; Wendy J Bailey; Douglas T Thudium; Michael J Topper; Thomas R Skopek; Joseph F Sina; Warren E Glaab; Jacky Vonderscher; Gérard Maurer; Salah-Dine Chibout; Frank D Sistare; David L Gerhold Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Vishal S Vaidya; Victoria Ramirez; Takaharu Ichimura; Norma A Bobadilla; Joseph V Bonventre Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2005-09-20
Authors: Vishal S Vaidya; Josef S Ozer; Frank Dieterle; Fitz B Collings; Victoria Ramirez; Sean Troth; Nagaraja Muniappa; Douglas Thudium; David Gerhold; Daniel J Holder; Norma A Bobadilla; Estelle Marrer; Elias Perentes; André Cordier; Jacky Vonderscher; Gérard Maurer; Peter L Goering; Frank D Sistare; Joseph V Bonventre Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christos P Argyropoulos; Shan Shan Chen; Yue-Harn Ng; Maria-Eleni Roumelioti; Kamran Shaffi; Pooja P Singh; Antonios H Tzamaloukas Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2017-06-15
Authors: Challa Jaswanth; P S Priyamvada; Bobby Zachariah; Sathish Haridasan; Sreejith Parameswaran; R P Swaminathan Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2019-01-28