Literature DB >> 26441339

Assessing the potential for intrinsic recovery in a Collembola two-generation study: possible implementation in a tiered soil risk assessment approach for plant protection products.

Gregor Ernst1, Patrick Kabouw2, Markus Barth3, Michael T Marx4, Ursula Frommholz4, Stefanie Royer2, Sabine Friedrich3.   

Abstract

Collembola are soil dwelling organisms that provide important ecosystem services within soils. To increase realism in evaluating potential effects of plant protection products a Collembola two-generation study was developed. This test assesses the potential for recovery of Collembola when exposed to plant protection products. Juvenile individuals of Folsomia candida (Willem, Ann Soc Entomol Belg 46:275-283, 1902) which hatched under conditions of exposure to a test substance in a modified OECD 232 bioassay were introduced into a second consecutive bioassay containing the same test substance aged in soil. This test system determines whether a population which was initially impacted by a substance in a 1st bioassay shows normal reproduction or survival in a 2nd bioassay after aging of the test substance in soil. An intermediate period for juvenile growth is included between the 1st and 2nd bioassay in order to reduce the control treatment variability in reproduction and mortality to fulfill the validity criteria according to the OECD 232 guideline. The Collembola two-generation study is able to differentiate between substances showing either a potential long-term risk or comprising a low risk. Comparing the results of this two generation study with data from semi-field or field studies indicates a high degree of conservatism when this test is considered within a tiered risk assessment scheme. This approach represents a valuable tool which makes the risk assessment more efficient by providing an alternative refinement option for highly conservative tier 1 Collembola risk assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collembola; Folsomia candida; Multi-generation study; Potential for recovery; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26441339     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1560-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  5 in total

1.  Multigeneration effects of insect growth regulators on the springtail Folsomia candida.

Authors:  Sophie Campiche; Grégory L'Ambert; Joseph Tarradellas; Kristin Becker-van Slooten
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Multigeneration exposure of the springtail Folsomia candida to phenanthrone: from dose-response relationships to threshold concentrations.

Authors:  Miriam Leon Paumen; Erik Steenbergen; Michiel H S Kraak; Nico M Van Straalen; Cornelis A M Van Gestel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Folsomia candida (Collembola): a "standard" soil arthropod.

Authors:  Michelle T Fountain; Steve P Hopkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  The response of soil organism communities to the application of the insecticide lindane in terrestrial model ecosystems.

Authors:  B Scholz-Starke; A Beylich; T Moser; A Nikolakis; N Rumpler; A Schäffer; B Theißen; A Toschki; M Roß-Nickoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Adaptations and Predispositions of Different Middle European Arthropod Taxa (Collembola, Araneae, Chilopoda, Diplopoda) to Flooding and Drought Conditions.

Authors:  Michael Thomas Marx; Patrick Guhmann; Peter Decker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Multigeneration toxicity of imidacloprid and thiacloprid to Folsomia candida.

Authors:  Cornelis A M van Gestel; Claudia de Lima E Silva; Thao Lam; Jacco C Koekkoek; Marja H Lamoree; Rudo A Verweij
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Assessing the toxicity of thiamethoxam, in natural LUFA 2.2 soil, through three generations of Folsomia candida.

Authors:  Cláudia de Lima E Silva; Justine Mariette; Rudo A Verweij; Cornelis A M van Gestel
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.823

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.