Chang Liu1,2, Jiu-lin Song3, Wu-sheng Lu4, Jia-yin Yang5, Li Jiang6, Lu-nan Yan7, Jing-yi Zhang8, Qiang Lu9, Tian-fu Wen10, Ming-qing Xu11, Wen-tao Wang12. 1. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Westchina_lc@foxmail.com. 2. Center of Interventional Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. Westchina_lc@foxmail.com. 3. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. songjiulin1990@qq.com. 4. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Luwu8@126.com. 5. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. docjackyang@163.com. 6. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Jl339@126.com. 7. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Yanlunan688@163.com. 8. Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. 51219038@qq.com. 9. Department of Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. 1915968289@qq.com. 10. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. ccwentianfu@sohu.com. 11. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. xumingqing0018@163.com. 12. Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. wwt02@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the hepatic hemodynamics plays important roles in graft regeneration, and the hepatic blood inflows are associated with graft size. However, the data of interplay between the hepatic arterial buffer response (HABR) and graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) in clinical LDLT are lacking. AIMS: To identify the effect of the HABR on the hepatic hemodynamics and recovery of graft function and to evaluate the safe lower limit of the GRWR in carefully selected recipients. METHODS: Portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow was measured in recipients with ultrasonography, and the graft functional recovery, various complications, and survive states after LDLT were compared. RESULTS: In total, 246 consecutive patients underwent LDLT with right lobe grafts. In total, 26 had a GRWR < 0.7 % (A), 29 had a GRWR between 0.7 and 0.8 % (B), and 181 had a GRWR > 0.8 % (C). For small-for-size syndrome, there was no significant difference (P = 0.176). Graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 year were not different (P = 0.710). The portal vein flow and portal vein flow per 100 g graft weight peaks were significantly higher in the A. Hepatic arterial velocity and hepatic arterial flow decreased in all the three groups on postoperative day 1; however, the hepatic arterial flow per 100 g graft weight was close to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: HABR played important roles not only in the homeostasis of hepatic afferent blood supply but also in maintaining enough hepatic perfusion to the graft.
BACKGROUND: In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the hepatic hemodynamics plays important roles in graft regeneration, and the hepatic blood inflows are associated with graft size. However, the data of interplay between the hepatic arterial buffer response (HABR) and graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) in clinical LDLT are lacking. AIMS: To identify the effect of the HABR on the hepatic hemodynamics and recovery of graft function and to evaluate the safe lower limit of the GRWR in carefully selected recipients. METHODS: Portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow was measured in recipients with ultrasonography, and the graft functional recovery, various complications, and survive states after LDLT were compared. RESULTS: In total, 246 consecutive patients underwent LDLT with right lobe grafts. In total, 26 had a GRWR < 0.7 % (A), 29 had a GRWR between 0.7 and 0.8 % (B), and 181 had a GRWR > 0.8 % (C). For small-for-size syndrome, there was no significant difference (P = 0.176). Graft survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 year were not different (P = 0.710). The portal vein flow and portal vein flow per 100 g graft weight peaks were significantly higher in the A. Hepatic arterial velocity and hepatic arterial flow decreased in all the three groups on postoperative day 1; however, the hepatic arterial flow per 100 g graft weight was close to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS:HABR played important roles not only in the homeostasis of hepatic afferent blood supply but also in maintaining enough hepatic perfusion to the graft.
Authors: Anthony J Demetris; Dympna M Kelly; Bijan Eghtesad; Paulo Fontes; J Wallis Marsh; Kusum Tom; Heinke P Tan; Thomas Shaw-Stiffel; Linda Boig; Paula Novelli; Raymond Planinsic; John J Fung; Amadeo Marcos Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: T Kiuchi; M Kasahara; K Uryuhara; Y Inomata; S Uemoto; K Asonuma; H Egawa; S Fujita; M Hayashi; K Tanaka Journal: Transplantation Date: 1999-01-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Ka Wing Ma; Kelly Hiu Ching Wong; Albert Chi Yan Chan; Tan To Cheung; Wing Chiu Dai; James Yan Yue Fung; Wong Hoi She; Chung Mau Lo; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742