| Literature DB >> 26441260 |
Mario J Grijalva1, Anita G Villacis2, Sofia Ocaña-Mayorga1, Cesar A Yumiseva2, Ana L Moncayo2, Esteban G Baus2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chagas disease is endemic to the southern Andean region of Ecuador, an area with one of the highest poverty rates in the country. However, few studies have looked into the epidemiology, vectors and transmission risks in this region. In this study we describe the triatomine household infestation in Loja province, determine the rate of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in triatomines and study the risk factors associated with infestation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26441260 PMCID: PMC4595344 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Triatomine infestation in Loja Province, a region of southern Ecuador having several ecological regions.
Location of each community surveyed is marked. The size of the symbol corresponds to the % of houses infested with triatomines in each community. The colors represent the four triatomine species found: Red = R. ecuadoriensis, blue = T. carrioni, green = P. rufotuberculatus and yellow = P. chinai. Classification of ecological regions as per Sierra et al [14].
Triatomine species found in domiciles and peridomiciliary areas of rural communities in Loja Province.
| Species | Entomological indexes | Colonization (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Triatomines collected | Infested domiciles | Domiciles with nymphs | Infestation (%) | Density | Crowding | Median (IR) | ||
| Intradomicile | ||||||||
|
| 700 | 67 | 47 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 10.4 | 3 (1–6) | 70.1 |
|
| 846 | 87 | 68 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 9.7 | 5 (2–10) | 78.2 |
|
| 173 | 44 | 27 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 1 (3–5) | 61.4 |
|
| 47 | 10 | 6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 4.7 | 2 (1–4) | 60.0 |
| Total | 1,768 | 208 | 148 | 6.5 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 4 (2–9) | 71.2 |
| Peridomicile | ||||||||
|
| 7,762 | 79 | 73 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 98.3 | 26 (9–124) | 92.4 |
|
| 1,347 | 36 | 33 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 37.4 | 10.5 (4.3–31) | 91.7 |
|
| 235 | 12 | 8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 19.6 | 5 (2–15) | 66.7 |
|
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 (1–4) | 50.0 |
| Total | 9,349 | 129 | 115 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 72.5 | 15 (4–70) | 89.1 |
| All habitats | ||||||||
|
| 8,462 | 132 | 109 | 4.1 | 2.7 | 64.1 | 12 (2–49) | 82.6 |
|
| 2,193 | 107 | 88 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 20.5 | 6 (2–17) | 82.2 |
|
| 408 | 51 | 32 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 8.0 | 3 (1–8) | 62.7 |
|
| 52 | 12 | 7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 2 (1–3.8) | 58.3 |
| Total | 11,115 | 282 | 226 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 39.4 | 7 (2–18) | 80.1 |
a R, Rhodnius; T, Triatoma; P, Panstrongylus.
b Infestation rate (100 x number of houses infested /number of houses searched), density (number of triatomines captured/number of houses searched), crowding (number of triatomines captured/number of houses infested), and colonization index (100 x number of houses with nymphs/number of houses infested) (WHO 2002).
c Median and Interquartile range (IR) of number of triatomines found in infested domestic units.
Fig 2Population structure of triatomines collected in rural communities of Loja Province, Ecuador.
Number of live Nymphal I—V instars and adult female and male bugs collected in domestic (Dom) and peridomestic (Peri) habitats. A) R. ecuadoriensis, B) T. carrioni, C) P. chinai and D) P. rufotuberculatus.
Characteristic of domiciles from 92 communities located in rural areas of Loja Province.
| House characteristic | n = 3,039 | % |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Cement/asbestos/zinc | 423 | 14% |
| Tile | 2596 | 85% |
| Palm, other | 20 | 1% |
|
| ||
| Cement/brick | 785 | 26% |
| Adobe | 2119 | 70% |
| Wood | 43 | 1% |
| Cane, other | 75 | 3% |
|
| ||
| Cement/tile/wooden parquet | 1001 | 33% |
| Wood boards | 520 | 17% |
| Cane, other | 20 | 1% |
| Dirt | 1491 | 49% |
|
| ||
| Bedrooms ≤ 2 | 2276 | 76% |
| Inhabitant crowding | 1124 | 53% |
|
| ||
| Electricity | 1912 | 90% |
| No latrine | 1246 | 41% |
| Public sewer system | 119 | 6% |
| Sewage to environment | 1279 | 60% |
| Piped water system | 1324 | 62% |
| Septic tank | 423 | 20% |
| Water from river or stream | 669 | 32% |
| Sprayed < 12 months | 464 | 15% |
|
| ||
| Natural gas | 1665 | 79% |
| Firewood/coal | 1720 | 81% |
|
| ||
| Firewood | 333 | 16% |
| Agricultural products | 1262 | 60% |
a total n varies among each item from 2.996 to 3,039 due missing values.
b total n varies among each item from 2,099 to 2,204 due to a change on the questionnaire form in 2008 and some missing values.
c Inhabitant crowding = more than 3 people per bedroom.
Peridomestic materials and vegetation, found in rural communities of Loja Province.
| Item | Total | n (%) | Distance in meters from domicile Median (IR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firewood | 2,097 | 1,354 (65) | 3 (1–5) |
| Wood for construction | 2,087 | 422 (20) | 3 (1–5) |
| Rocks/brick piles | 2,087 | 799 (38) | 3 (1–5) |
| Household trash | 2,085 | 1,265 (61) | 6 (3–10) |
| Agricultural refuse | 2,091 | 653 (31) | 5 (2–20) |
| Agricultural products | 2,089 | 534 (26) | 3 (1–5) |
| Bushes (arbustos) | 2,097 | 1,802 (86) | 5 (3–10) |
| Fruit trees | 2,088 | 1,215 (58) | 5 (4–10) |
| Brush or scrub | 2,090 | 1,671 (80) | 5 (3–10) |
| Palm trees <30 m | 2,078 | 83 (4) | - |
a total n varies among each item from 2,078 to 2,097 due to missing values.
b Median and Interquartile Range of distance in meters from domicile (IR)
Livestock found in rural communities of Loja Province.
| Livestock | Total | n (%) | Animals per domicile Median (IR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chickens, other birds | 3,029 | 2,740 (91) | 10 (6–20) |
| Dogs | 3,032 | 2,442 (81) | 2 (1–3) |
| Guinea pigs (outdoor) | 3,028 | 759 (25) | 6 (4–10) |
| Pigs | 3,031 | 1,994 (64) | 3 (1–5) |
| Sheep or goats | 3,029 | 588 (19) | 5 (3–10) |
| Cats | 3,015 | 1,716 (57) | 1 (1–2) |
a total n varies among each item from 3,015 to 3,032 due to missing values.
b Median and Interquartile Range (IR) of animals per domicile
Important determinants for intradomicile and peridomicile infestation by R. ecuadoriensis in Loja province (N = 2120).
| Intradomicile | Peridomicile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Infested DUs | OR | 95% CI | RI | Infested DUs | OR | 95% CI | RI |
| n (%) | n (%) | |||||||
|
| 40 (2.84) | 3.29 | 0.88–12.32 | 1.0 | 51 (3.63) | 2.79 | 0.81–9.63 | 1.0 |
|
| 5 (0.94) | 0.32 | 0.08–1.27 | 1.0 | ||||
|
| 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Dry mountain forest | 1 (0.34) | 1.00 | 2 (0.69) | 1.00 | ||||
| Green_low mountain forest | 19 (4.34) | 13.22 | 1.79–97.84 | 16 (3.65) | 5.95 | 1.06–33.40 | ||
| Semi_decidous forest | 12 (1.38) | 4.47 | 0.60–33.26 | 24 (2.75) | 4.47 | 0.82–24.41 | ||
| Decidous forest | 14 (3.06) | 7.89 | 1.06–58.80 | 17 (3.71) | 6.05 | 1.08–33.96 | ||
| Cloud forest | 0 (0.0) | ---- | ---- | 0 (0) | ---- | ---- | ||
|
| 18 (4.01) | 1.87 | 0.60–5.82 | 0.76 | 19 (4.23) | 1.44 | 0.48–4.31 | 0.37 |
|
| 19 (1.52) | 0.58 | 0.19–1.77 | 0.68 | ||||
|
| 31 (3.37) | 1.83 | 0.57–5.94 | 0.67 | 38 (4.13) | 2.09 | 0.70–6.27 | 0.95 |
|
| 35 (2.73) | 1.74 | 0.54–5.63 | 0.59 | 43 (3.35) | 1.43 | 0.48–4.24 | 0.39 |
|
| 40 (2.35) | 1.90 | 0.51–7.11 | 0.54 | ||||
|
| 43 (2.38) | 1.88 | 0.41–8.73 | 0.35 | ||||
|
| 21 (2.77) | 1.40 | 0.47–4.16 | 0.32 | 31 (4.10) | 2.08 | 0.74–5.84 | 1.0 |
|
| 19 (2.91) | 1.38 | 0.45–4.20 | 0.30 | ||||
|
| 21 (1.59) | 0.76 | 0.24–2.42 | 0.25 | ||||
|
| 10 (1.46) | 0.29 | 0.09–0.99 | 1.0 | ||||
|
| 8 (1.59) | 0.40 | 0.11–1.39 | 0.99 | ||||
|
| 25 (4.41) | 1.80 | 0.63–5.12 | 0.97 | ||||
|
| 46 (3.34) | 1.78 | 0.58–5.48 | 0.72 | ||||
|
| 38 (3.60) | 1.66 | 0.56–4.88 | 0.64 | ||||
|
| 54 (3.10) | 1.71 | 0.43–6.79 | 0.38 | ||||
|
| 19 (2.38) | 0.89 | 0.31–2.61 | 0.20 | ||||
*Model_averaged effect-sizes (OR) from the final 4096-model set
**Model_averaged effect-sizes (OR) from the final 8192-model set
Relative importance (RI) of variables was assessed by multi-model inference based on Akaike's information criterion
OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: Confidence Interval
VCP: Vector Control Program
Important determinants for intradomicile and peridomicile infestation by T. carrioni in Loja province (N = 2120).
| Intradomicile | Peridomicile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Infested DUs | OR | 95% CI | RI | Infested DUs | OR | 95% CI | RI |
| n (%) | n (%) | |||||||
|
| 45 (3.51) | 4.99 | 1.17–21.18 | 1.0 | ||||
|
| 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Semi deciduous forest | 15 (1.72) | 1.00 | 4 (0.46) | 1.37 | 0.17–10.98 | |||
| Green low mountain forest | 21 (4.79) | 1.67 | 0.51–5.53 | 8 (1.83) | 5.36 | 0.70–41.13 | ||
| Dry mountain forest | 13 (4.48) | 2.05 | 0.58–7.17 | 1 (0.34) | 1.00 | 0.17–10.98 | ||
| Deciduous forest | 0 (0.0) | ---- | ---- | 0 (0.0) | ---- | ---- | ||
| Cloud forest | 0 (0.0) | ---- | ---- | 0 (0.0) | ---- | ---- | ||
|
| 23 (4.56) | 2.21 | 0.74–6.62 | 0.99 | ||||
|
| 37 (2.96) | 2.17 | 0.69–6.87 | 0.99 | 10 (0.80) | 2.03 | 0.41–10.11 | 0.37 |
|
| 37 (3.51) | 1.98 | 0.60–6.52 | 0.77 | ||||
|
| 18 (1.36) | 0.54 | 0.17–1.67 | 0.73 | 4 (0.30) | 0.42 | 0.09–2.00 | 0.52 |
|
| 47 (2.73) | 2.67 | 0.49–14.47 | 0.55 | ||||
|
| 38 (2.70) | 1.67 | 0.51–5.44 | 0.52 | 7 (0.50) | 0.60 | 0.13–2.66 | 0.30 |
|
| 12 (1.59) | 0.63 | 0.20–2.01 | 0.46 | 2 (0.26) | 0.36 | 0.06–2.04 | 0.51 |
|
| 6 (1.34) | 0.57 | 0.15–2.17 | 0.42 | ||||
|
| 14 (2.64) | 1.51 | 0.48–4.78 | 0.39 | ||||
|
| 26 (2.00) | 0.73 | 0.24–2.16 | 0.36 | 5 (0.38) | 0.35 | 0.08–1.59 | 0.70 |
|
| 47 (2.52) | 1.88 | 0.34–10.33 | 0.32 | ||||
|
| 2 (0.25) | 0.31 | 0.05–1.78 | 0.63 | ||||
|
| 11 (0.80) | 3.03 | 0.53–17.18 | 0.57 | ||||
|
| 12 (0.71) | 2.88 | 0.38–21.70 | 0.38 | ||||
*Model_averaged effect-sizes (OR) from the final 8192-model set
**Model_averaged effect-sizes (OR) from the final 512-model set
Relative importance (RI) of variables was assessed by multi-model inference based on Akaike's information criterion
OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: Confidence Interval.
VCP: Vector control program Insecticide spraying
Trypanosoma cruzi and T. rangeli infection of triatomines collected in rural communities in Loja province.
| Domicile | Peridomicile | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triatomine | No. Triatomines analyzed | infected with | infected with | No. Triatomines analyzed | infected with | infected with | No. Triatomines analyzed | infected with | infected with |
|
| 74 | 22 (29,7) | 2 (2,7) | 260 | 26 (10,0) | 3 (1,2) | 334 | 48 (14,4) | 5 (1,5) |
|
| 179 | 8 (4,5) | 2 (1,1) | 120 | 10 (8,3) | 0 (0) | 299 | 18 (6,0) | 2 (0,7) |
|
| 88 | 12 (13,6) | 4 (4,5) | 21 | 2 (9,5) | 2 (9.5) | 109 | 14 (12,8) | 6 (5,5) |
|
| 12 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 | ------ | ------ | 12 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 353 | 42 (11,9) | 8 (2,3) | 401 | 38 (9,5) | 5 (1,2) | 754 | 80 (10,6) | 13 (1,7) |
Rhodnius (R), Triatoma (T), Pastrongylus (P)
Comparison of PCR and Microscopy for T. cruzi and T. rangeli detection in triatomines.
| PCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ME | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Positive | 27 | 15 | 42 |
| Negative | 63 | 646 | 709 |
|
| 90 | 661 | 751 |
ME: microscopy examination;
PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction