Literature DB >> 26441253

The results of a consecutive series of dynamic posterior stabilizations using the PercuDyn device.

Gianfranco Canero1, Stefano Carbone2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a consecutive series of patients affected by lumbar discogenic pain associated with facet pain and canal stenosis surgically treated with the PercuDyn device.
METHODS: From 2009, 129 consecutive patients (96 M, 33 F, mean age 62) were treated with posterior dynamic stabilization screws (PercuDyn). Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 24 months; pain localized at the lumbar spine column alone or in association to lower limb radicular pain; magnetic resonance evidence of disc degeneration associated with facet degeneration and canal stenosis. Patients were clinically studied using VAS scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); CT assessment of the neuroforamina and spinal canal areas was done at 1 month of follow-up.
RESULTS: At 24 months of follow-up, 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 96 intervertebral spaces were treated (85 levels L5-S1, 11 levels L4-L5). The VAS scale showed a statistically significant difference at 1 month, 6 months and 2 years with respect to the pre-operative value (p < 0.001). The ODI score registered a significant difference with the same fashion (p < 0.001 both at 1- and 6-month, and 2-year follow-up with respect to the pre-operatory). At 1-month follow-up, neuroforamina and spinal canal areas were considerably wider (p < 0.05). 70 (72.5 %) patients were satisfied of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: In this wide cohort study, the PercuDyn ensured good clinical and radiological results, with more than 70 % of patients satisfied of the procedure. Very few complications were noted, with an immediate return to daily activities. At longer follow-ups, 10 % of patients received revision surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disc degeneration; Discogenic lumbar pain; Minimally invasive surgery; PercuDyn; Posterior dynamic stabilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26441253     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4268-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review.

Authors:  E Arbit; S Pannullo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices.

Authors:  Sophia N Sangiorgio; Hormoz Sheikh; Sean L Borkowski; Larry Khoo; Christopher R Warren; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Wolfram Käfer; Balkan Cakir; Stefan Midderhoff; Heiko Reichel; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Increasing neuroforaminal volume by anterior interbody distraction in degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Chen; L A Fay; J Lok; P Yuan; W T Edwards; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Two-year follow-up after microsurgical discectomy and dynamic percutaneous stabilization in degenerate and herniated lumbar disc: clinical and neuroradiological outcome.

Authors:  G Maida; C Altruda; M Gatti; A Saletti; M Borrelli; S Sarubbo
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The use of the percentage change in Oswestry Disability Index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  D G Little; D MacDonald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis minimally invasive treatment with bilateral transpedicular facet augmentation system.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Umberto Tarantino; Giovanni Nano; Riccardo Iundusi; Roberto Fiori; Valerio Da Ros; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Effectiveness of percutaneous screws for treatment of degenerative lumbar low back pain.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Luca Saba; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Stefano Marini; Emanuele Piras; Mariangela Marras; Salvatore Masala; Bassem Georgy
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  A minimally invasive technique for percutaneous lumbar facet augmentation: Technical description of a novel device.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Sean Armin; Dan Raphael; Larry T Khoo
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-11-19

10.  Comparison between posterior dynamic stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haodong Fei; Jiang Xu; Shouguo Wang; Yue Xie; Feng Ji; Yongyi Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Prospective Long-term Follow-up Study of the Posterior Dynamic Stabilizing System to Treat Back Pain Associated With Degenerative Disc Disease.

Authors:  Haider Kareem; Christian Ulbricht
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-01

2.  Biomechanical investigation of a minimally invasive posterior spine stabilization system in comparison to the Universal Spinal System (USS).

Authors:  D Kubosch; E J Kubosch; B Gueorguiev; I Zderic; M Windolf; K Izadpanah; N P Südkamp; P C Strohm
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.