Literature DB >> 26440564

Liver metabolic activity changes over time with neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Yusuf Demir1, Erdem Sürücü, Tarik Şengöz, Murat Koç, Gamze Ç Kaya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate, using PET/computed tomography (CT), changes in liver metabolic activity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 29 biopsy-proven LARC patients between 2009 and 2012 were studied. Liver standardized uptake values (SUVs) and SUVs adjusted for lean body mass (SULs) were obtained from PET/CT images obtained at 1 h (early) and 2 h (late) after (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) administration both before and after neoadjuvant CRT. Age, sex, BMI, lean body mass, blood glucose level, and (18)F-FDG dose, which can influence liver SUVs and SULs, were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Fourteen (48%) men and 15 (52%) women with a mean age of 62±11 years (range 34-80 years) were included in the study. The mean SUVs and SULs were significantly decreased in the late scans. Sex was significantly correlated with the mean liver SUV in early and late scans. The mean SUV differed significantly between male and female patients in early and late images (P<0.05). In a multivariate stepwise regression analysis, only liver SUVs (maximum and mean) were significantly associated with BMI before and after therapy. SUVs were significantly higher in the high (≥25) BMI group after but not before therapy. Mean SUL was not influenced by BMI.
CONCLUSION: Liver (18)F-FDG uptake is consistent before and after neoadjuvant CRT therapy in patients with LARC. When assessing response to therapy and using liver metabolic activity to indicate background activity, BMI should be considered as it can influence liver metabolic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26440564     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  2 in total

1.  Quantification: there is more to worry about than good scanner hardware and reliable calibration.

Authors:  Jörg Kotzerke; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The appropriate whole body metric for calculating standardised uptake value and the influence of sex.

Authors:  Georgia Keramida; A Michael Peters
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.690

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.