Literature DB >> 26440187

Temporary confinement of loose-housed hyperprolific sows reduces piglet mortality.

J Hales, V A Moustsen, M B F Nielsen, C F Hansen.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate piglet mortality in a commercial setting where sows were accommodated in a loose-housed system with an option to confine the sow for a few days around farrowing and during early lactation. The study was conducted in a Danish piggery where records were obtained from 2,139 farrowings. Sows were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: loose-loose (LL), loose-confined (LC), and confined-confined (CC). In LL, sows were loose housed from the time they entered the farrowing pens to weaning. In LC, sows were loose housed until farrowing was finished and then confined to d 4 after farrowing. In CC, sows were confined at d 114 of gestation to d 4 after farrowing. All sows were loose housed from d 5 to weaning. Total piglet mortality was analyzed at batch level to include piglets fostered by nurse sows and at sow level to analyze the effects of confinement during different time periods. Total piglet mortality was greater in LL (26.0%) and LC (25.4%) compared with CC (22.1%; < 0.001). The proportion of stillborn piglets was not different between treatments ( = 0.21) but a larger proportion was crushed in LL (10.7%) compared with LC (9.7%; = 0.03), which again was greater than CC (7.8%; < 0.001). Piglet mortality before equalization was lower in CC (3.7%) than in LL (7.5%) and LC (7.0%; < 0.001). Confinement reduced mortality from litter equalization to d 4 (7.6% for LL vs. 6.7% for LC; = 0.01) but more so in CC (5.6%) than in LC ( < 0.001). From d 4 to weaning, LL had lower mortality (5.6%) than LC (6.9%) and CC (6.6%; = 0.01). A larger proportion of sows in CC were classified as "low mortality" compared with LL and LC both before ( < 0.001) and after ( = 0.002) litter equalization. The results in this study emphasize that the period of time from the birth of the first piglet to litter equalization is important in relation to piglet mortality. The results also suggest that confinement for 4 d after farrowing can reduce mortality in this specific period, but only confinement from d 114 of gestation to d 4 after farrowing reduced total piglet mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26440187     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-8973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Sow stress levels and behavior and piglet performances in farrowing crates and farrowing pens with temporary crating.

Authors:  Sébastien Goumon; Iva Leszkowová; Marie Šimecková; Gudrun Illmann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Supplemental effects of dietary lysophospholipids in lactation diets on sow performance, milk composition, gut health, and gut-associated microbiome of offspring.

Authors:  Ki Beom Jang; Jerry M Purvis; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

4.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  The Effect of Sows' and Piglets' Behaviour on Piglet Crushing Patterns in Two Different Farrowing Pen Systems.

Authors:  Thies Nicolaisen; Eyke Lühken; Nina Volkmann; Karl Rohn; Nicole Kemper; Michaela Fels
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Review of Temporary Crating of Farrowing and Lactating Sows.

Authors:  Sébastien Goumon; Gudrun Illmann; Vivi A Moustsen; Emma M Baxter; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-17

7.  Parallels between Postpartum Disorders in Humans and Preweaning Piglet Mortality in Sows.

Authors:  Courtney Daigle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows.

Authors:  Yohan Choi; Yejin Min; Younghwa Kim; Yongdae Jeong; Doowan Kim; Joeun Kim; Hyunjung Jung
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-31

9.  "Mothers Should Have Freedom of Movement"-Citizens' Attitudes Regarding Farrowing Housing Systems for Sows and Their Piglets.

Authors:  Bianca Vandresen; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.