| Literature DB >> 26440101 |
Daniel Courteix, João Valente-Dos-Santos, Béatrice Ferry, Gérard Lac, Bruno Lesourd, Robert Chapier, Geraldine Naughton, Geoffroy Marceau, Manuel João Coelho-E-Silva, Agnès Vinet, Guillaume Walther, Philippe Obert, Frédéric Dutheil.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26440101 PMCID: PMC4595444 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 2Changes (360 days) on total body bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD), lumbar spine BMC and BMD and femoral neck BMC and BMD for re, Re and rE groups.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance. There were no significant differences in BMD and BMC parameters between re, Re and rE participants across the intervention. Participants in the intervention did not have significantly greater or lower bone mass or density development than controls.
Fig 4Compliance effect (360 days) on total body bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD and femoral neck BMD for re, Re and rE groups.
re: moderate-resistance-moderate-endurance; Re: high-Resistance-moderate-endurance; rE: moderate-resistance-high-Endurance. *Compliant participants significantly different from non-compliants (p<0.05). ‡ Compliant participants significantly different from controls. § Significant difference Re compliants vs. rE compliants.