Literature DB >> 26439272

Cortical Thickness in Fusiform Face Area Predicts Face and Object Recognition Performance.

Rankin W McGugin1, Ana E Van Gulick2, Isabel Gauthier1.   

Abstract

The fusiform face area (FFA) is defined by its selectivity for faces. Several studies have shown that the response of FFA to nonface objects can predict behavioral performance for these objects. However, one possible account is that experts pay more attention to objects in their domain of expertise, driving signals up. Here, we show an effect of expertise with nonface objects in FFA that cannot be explained by differential attention to objects of expertise. We explore the relationship between cortical thickness of FFA and face and object recognition using the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Vanderbilt Expertise Test, respectively. We measured cortical thickness in functionally defined regions in a group of men who evidenced functional expertise effects for cars in FFA. Performance with faces and objects together accounted for approximately 40% of the variance in cortical thickness of several FFA patches. Whereas participants with a thicker FFA cortex performed better with vehicles, those with a thinner FFA cortex performed better with faces and living objects. The results point to a domain-general role of FFA in object perception and reveal an interesting double dissociation that does not contrast faces and objects but rather living and nonliving objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26439272      PMCID: PMC5034353          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  62 in total

1.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; F X Castellanos; H Liu; A Zijdenbos; T Paus; A C Evans; J L Rapoport
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Relationships between IQ and regional cortical gray matter thickness in healthy adults.

Authors:  Katherine L Narr; Roger P Woods; Paul M Thompson; Philip Szeszko; Delbert Robinson; Teodora Dimtcheva; Mala Gurbani; Arthur W Toga; Robert M Bilder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Semantic category dissociations in naming: is there a gender effect in Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  M Laiacona; R Barbarotto; E Capitani
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Expertise Effects in Face-Selective Areas are Robust to Clutter and Diverted Attention, but not to Competition.

Authors:  Rankin Williams McGugin; Ana E Van Gulick; Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; David A Ross; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Function and structure of human left fusiform cortex are closely associated with perceptual learning of faces.

Authors:  Taiyong Bi; Juan Chen; Tiangang Zhou; Yong He; Fang Fang
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Catherine M Warrier; Virginia B Penhune; Anil K Roy; Abdulmalek Sadehh; Todd B Parrish; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  8 in total

1.  Connectivity of the ventral visual cortex is necessary for object recognition in patients.

Authors:  Ye Li; Yuxing Fang; Xiaoying Wang; Luping Song; Ruiwang Huang; Zaizhu Han; Gaolang Gong; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Posterior parietal influences on visual network specialization during development: An fMRI study of functional connectivity in children ages 9 to 12.

Authors:  Jonathan F O'Rawe; Anna S Huang; Daniel N Klein; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Volume versus surface-based cortical thickness measurements: A comparative study with healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  R Righart; P Schmidt; R Dahnke; V Biberacher; A Beer; D Buck; B Hemmer; J S Kirschke; C Zimmer; C Gaser; M Mühlau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Age-related changes to oscillatory dynamics during maintenance and retrieval in a relational memory task.

Authors:  Renante Rondina Ii; Rosanna K Olsen; Lingqian Li; Jed A Meltzer; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mathematical expertise modulates the architecture of dorsal and cortico-thalamic white matter tracts.

Authors:  Hyeon-Ae Jeon; Ulrike Kuhl; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Are global and specific interindividual differences in cortical thickness associated with facets of cognitive abilities, including face cognition?

Authors:  Kristina Meyer; Benjamín Garzón; Martin Lövdén; Andrea Hildebrandt
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Through Thick and Thin: Baseline Cortical Volume and Thickness Predict Performance and Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Authors:  Nicole R Nissim; Denise Y Harvey; Christopher Haslam; Leah Friedman; Pandurang Bharne; Geneva Litz; Jeffrey S Phillips; Katheryn A Q Cousins; Sharon X Xie; Murray Grossman; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Child brain exhibits a multi-rhythmic response to attachment cues.

Authors:  Maayan Pratt; Abraham Goldstein; Ruth Feldman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.