Literature DB >> 2643895

A comparison of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure during mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with severe ARDS.

J L Teboul1, W M Zapol, C Brun-Buisson, F Abrouk, A Rauss, F Lemaire.   

Abstract

When positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is applied to normal lungs, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) may reflect alveolar pressure and not left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The reliability of PAOP measurements has been questioned when PEEP levels greater than 10 cm H2O are applied. To verify whether this disparity occurs in patients with severe lung injury, the authors simultaneously measured both PAOP and LVEDP at 0, 10, and 16-20 cm H2O PEEP in 12 supine patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In all patients, the radiographic location of the PA catheter tip was at or below the level of the posterior border of the left atrium. A close correlation was found between PAOP and LVEDP at each level of PEEP. In only six of 35 simultaneous measurements was the PAOP-LVEDP gradient 2 mmHg or more (2-3 mmHg in four, and 4 mmHg in two). In five patients, the highest PEEP level was 4-9 cm H2O greater than LVEDP; however, no gradient was measured between LVEDP and PAOP. The authors conclude that, in severe ARDS, a close correspondence between PAOP and LVEDP is maintained despite applying PEEP levels up to 20 cm H2O, suggesting that, in ARDS, surrounding pathology prevents transmitted alveolar pressure from collapsing adjacent pulmonary vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2643895     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198902000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  8 in total

Review 1.  Practical points in the application of oxygen transport principles.

Authors:  P Nightingale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Weaning-induced cardiac dysfunction: where are we today?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Low pulmonary compliance and/or tachycardia may reduce arterial pressure variations despite hypovolemia.

Authors:  G Mion; C Descraques
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Haemodynamic monitoring. Problems, pitfalls and practical solutions.

Authors:  L L Bossaert; H E Demey; R De Jongh; L Heytens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  On the complexity of scoring acute respiratory distress syndrome: do not forget hemodynamics!

Authors:  Xavier Repessé; Alix Aubry; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.

Authors:  Clarice Daniele Alves de Oliveira-Costa; Gilberto Friedman; Sílvia Regina Rios Vieira; Léa Fialkow
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 7.  Bedside assessment of left atrial pressure in critical care: a multifaceted gem.

Authors:  Emma Maria Bowcock; Anthony Mclean
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 19.334

Review 8.  The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 1: placement and waveform analysis.

Authors:  I T Bootsma; E C Boerma; F de Lange; T W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.502

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.