Literature DB >> 26438809

Nature and Utilization of Civil Commitment for Substance Abuse in the United States.

Paul P Christopher1, Debra A Pinals2, Taylor Stayton1, Kellie Sanders1, Lester Blumberg1.   

Abstract

Substance abuse is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although civil commitment has been used to address substance abuse for more than a century, little is known today about the nature and use of substance-related commitment laws in the United States. We examined statutes between July 2010 and October 2012 from all 50 states and the District of Columbia for provisions authorizing civil commitment of adults for substance abuse and recorded the criteria and evidentiary standard for commitment and the location and the maximum duration of commitment orders. High-level state representatives evaluated these data and provided information on the use of commitment. Thirty-three states have statutory provisions for the civil commitment of persons because of substance abuse. The application of these statutes ranged from a few commitment cases to thousands annually. Although dangerousness was the most common basis for commitment, many states permitted it in other contexts. The maximum duration of treatment ranged from less than 1 month to more than 1 year for both initial and subsequent civil commitment orders. These findings show wide variability in the nature and application of civil commitment statutes for substance abuse in the United States. Such diversity reflects a lack of consensus on the role that civil commitment should play in managing substance abuse and the problems associated with it.
© 2015 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  7 in total

1.  State criminal justice policy context and opioid agonist treatment delivery among opioid treatment admissions, 2015.

Authors:  Shivani Mantha; Pia M Mauro; Christine M Mauro; Silvia S Martins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Assessing HIV and overdose risks for people who use drugs exposed to compulsory drug abstinence programs (CDAP): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anh T Vo; Christopher Magana; Matthew Hickman; Annick Borquez; Leo Beletsky; Natasha K Martin; Javier A Cepeda
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Increased non-fatal overdose risk associated with involuntary drug treatment in a longitudinal study with people who inject drugs.

Authors:  Claudia Rafful; Ricardo Orozco; Gudelia Rangel; Peter Davidson; Dan Werb; Leo Beletsky; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Civil commitment experiences among opioid users.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Bradley Anderson; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Experiences of Court Clinicians Who Perform Civil Commitment Evaluations for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Bailey E Pridgen; Ekaterina Pivovarova
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2021-02-12

6.  Evidence-Based Treatment of Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Scott E Hadland; Amy M Yule; Sharon J Levy; Eliza Hallett; Michael Silverstein; Sarah M Bagley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Risk behaviors among persons civilly committed for opioid use.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Catherine Stewart; William Manning; Bradley J Anderson; Alexander Woodruff; Jordanna Monteiro; Michael D Stein
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2021-05-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.