| Literature DB >> 26438787 |
Sabrina Zuchi1, Mutsumi Watanabe1, Hans-Michael Hubberten1, Mariusz Bromke1, Sonia Osorio1, Alisdair R Fernie1, Silvia Celletti1, Anna Rita Paolacci1, Giulio Catarcione1, Mario Ciaffi1, Rainer Hoefgen1, Stefania Astolfi2.
Abstract
Plant response mechanisms to deficiency of a single nutrient, such as sulfur (S) or iron (Fe), have been described at agronomic, physiological, biochemical, metabolomics, and transcriptomic levels. However, agroecosystems are often characterized by different scenarios, in which combined nutrient deficiencies are likely to occur. Soils are becoming depleted for S, whereas Fe, although highly abundant in the soil, is poorly available for uptake because of its insolubility in the soil matrix. To this end, earlier reports showed that a limited S availability reduces Fe uptake and that Fe deficiency results in the modulation of sulfate uptake and assimilation. However, the mechanistic basis of this interaction remains largely unknown. Metabolite profiling of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) shoots and roots from plants exposed to Fe, S, and combined Fe and S deficiency was performed to improve the understanding of the S-Fe interaction through the identification of the main players in the considered pathways. Distinct changes were revealed under the different nutritional conditions. Furthermore, we investigated the development of the Fe deficiency response through the analysis of expression of ferric chelate reductase, iron-regulated transporter, and putative transcription factor genes and plant sulfate uptake and mobilization capacity by analyzing the expression of genes encoding sulfate transporters (STs) of groups 1, 2, and 4 (SlST1.1, SlST1.2, SlST2.1, SlST2.2, and SlST4.1). We identified a high degree of common and even synergistic response patterns as well as nutrient-specific responses. The results are discussed in the context of current models of nutrient deficiency responses in crop plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26438787 PMCID: PMC4677893 DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Physiol ISSN: 0032-0889 Impact factor: 8.340