Literature DB >> 26438649

Sociodemographic Differences in the Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in the European Union.

Gaby Isabelle Ooms1, Jizzo R Bosdriesz2, France R M Portrait3, Anton E Kunst2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are rapidly increasing in popularity. However, little is known about sociodemographic differences in use of ENDS. This study aims to assess the sociodemographic characteristics associated with ENDS ever-use and use as a cessation tool in the European Union.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2012 Eurobarometer wave 77.1, with 25 922 respondents aged 15 years or above from all 27 member states. We estimated the prevalence of ever-use and use as a cessation tool, and performed binary logistic regression to analyze associations with sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 7.2% reported having ever used ENDS. Of all smokers who ever tried to quit, 7.0% used ENDS. Ever-use was inversely associated with being older than 34 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51-0.76 for 35-44 years, and OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.25-0.46 for at least 65 years), and positively associated with being higher educated (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.22-1.84) or a student (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.77-3.08). ENDS were more often used to quit smoking by students (OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.10-3.82), and were less likely to be used by those aged 65 or older (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.15-0.61). No significant differences were found according to sex, social class, marital status or type of community.
CONCLUSIONS: In 2012, ever-use of ENDS was low in the European population in general. However, younger people or those with a high education used ENDS more frequently. These results indicate a need for more appropriate product information targeted at these groups. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that in the European Union in 2012, regular use of ENDS was rare, especially among nonsmokers. Only age and education were strongly associated with ENDS use. The increased prevalence of ever-use among the younger age groups is relevant, as in this age group smoking habits are established. The higher ever-use of ENDS among younger and higher educated people found in this study indicates a need to target appropriate product information, stressing that ENDS use does not imply zero harm.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438649     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntv215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of current daily use of electronic cigarettes in the European Union: analysis of the 2014 Eurobarometer survey.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Konstantinos Poulas; Vassilis Voudris; Jacques Le Houezec
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Differences in E-Cigarette Uptake Among Cigarette Smokers: Longitudinal Analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.

Authors:  Alyssa F Harlow; Andrew Stokes; Daniel R Brooks
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 3.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Design and marketing features influencing choice of e-cigarettes and tobacco in the EU.

Authors:  Anthony A Laverty; Constantine I Vardavas; Filippos T Filippidis
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Consumers' Preferences for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Product Features: A Structured Content Analysis.

Authors:  Christine E Kistler; Trisha M Crutchfield; Erin L Sutfin; Leah M Ranney; Micah L Berman; Gary A Zarkin; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The Association between Potential Exposure to Magazine Ads with Voluntary Health Warnings and the Perceived Harmfulness of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS).

Authors:  Ce Shang; Scott R Weaver; Nahleen Zahra; Jidong Huang; Kai-Wen Cheng; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in e-Cigarette Use in Korea: Comparison with Inequalities in Conventional Cigarette Use Using Two National Surveys.

Authors:  Youngs Chang; Sanghyun Cho; Ikhan Kim; Young-Ho Khang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  E-Cigarette Use by Smoking Status in Estonia, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Rainer Reile; Kersti Pärna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Determinants of electronic cigarette use among Finnish adults: Results from a population-based survey.

Authors:  Otto Ruokolainen; Hanna Ollila; Karoliina Karjalainen
Journal:  Nordisk Alkohol Nark       Date:  2017-11-21

10.  Two-year trends and predictors of e-cigarette use in 27 European Union member states.

Authors:  Filippos T Filippidis; Anthony A Laverty; Vasiliki Gerovasili; Constantine I Vardavas
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 7.552

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.