Marco Kawamura Demange1, Riccardo Gomes Gobbi2, Gilberto Luis Camanho2. 1. Institute of Orthopaedic Surgery - Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Rua Ouvidio Pires de Campos, 333, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. demange@usp.br. 2. Institute of Orthopaedic Surgery - Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Rua Ouvidio Pires de Campos, 333, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy in patients with "fatigue meniscal tear", which presents as a non-traumatic tear with abrupt onset of symptoms of a radial tear in the transition between the middle and posterior thirds of the meniscus. METHODS: We prospectively followed 71 patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" (41 women and 30 men, mean age of 63 years, SD 6.9 years) recruited among 497 patients with isolated medial meniscal lesions treated between January 2006 and June 2011. Inclusion criteria were spontaneous abrupt onset knee pain, minor or no trauma, no radiographic or MRI osteoarthritis, no bone oedema, pre-operative magnetic resonance image of medial meniscus tear, and arthroscopic evaluation demonstrating radial or vertical flap tear in the body to posterior horn junction of the medial meniscus. We followed all patients for a minimum of two years and reviewed their clinical symptoms, physical exam, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction at last follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 4.2 years, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Among the 71 patients, there were 59 (83.1 %) good or excellent results and 12 (16.9 %) poor results. These 12 patients demanded further treatment because of persistent pain, with three of the patients developing subchondral bone fracture. All patient complaints and poor outcomes could be identified in the initial six months after surgery. There was no gender difference in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, with only 16.9 % reporting unfavourable results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Cohort study or case series.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy in patients with "fatigue meniscal tear", which presents as a non-traumatic tear with abrupt onset of symptoms of a radial tear in the transition between the middle and posterior thirds of the meniscus. METHODS: We prospectively followed 71 patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" (41 women and 30 men, mean age of 63 years, SD 6.9 years) recruited among 497 patients with isolated medial meniscal lesions treated between January 2006 and June 2011. Inclusion criteria were spontaneous abrupt onset knee pain, minor or no trauma, no radiographic or MRI osteoarthritis, no bone oedema, pre-operative magnetic resonance image of medial meniscus tear, and arthroscopic evaluation demonstrating radial or vertical flap tear in the body to posterior horn junction of the medial meniscus. We followed all patients for a minimum of two years and reviewed their clinical symptoms, physical exam, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction at last follow-up. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 4.2 years, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Among the 71 patients, there were 59 (83.1 %) good or excellent results and 12 (16.9 %) poor results. These 12 patients demanded further treatment because of persistent pain, with three of the patients developing subchondral bone fracture. All patient complaints and poor outcomes could be identified in the initial six months after surgery. There was no gender difference in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that patients with "fatigue meniscal tear" benefit from arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, with only 16.9 % reporting unfavourable results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Cohort study or case series.
Authors: C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Raine Sihvonen; Mika Paavola; Antti Malmivaara; Ari Itälä; Antti Joukainen; Heikki Nurmi; Juha Kalske; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Geoffrey D Abrams; Rachel M Frank; Anil K Gupta; Joshua D Harris; Frank M McCormick; Brian J Cole Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 6.202