Literature DB >> 26437595

Nuclear Reprogramming by Defined Factors: Quantity Versus Quality.

Shulamit Sebban1, Yosef Buganim2.   

Abstract

The generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and directly converted cells holds great promise in regenerative medicine. However, after in-depth studies of the murine system, we know that the current methodologies to produce these cells are not ideal and mostly yield cells of poor quality that might hold a risk in therapeutic applications. In this review we address the duality found in the literature regarding the use of 'quality' as a criterion for the clinic. We discuss the elements that influence reprogramming quality, and provide evidence that safety and functionality are directly linked to cell quality. Finally, because most of the available data come from murine systems, we speculate about what aspects can be applied to human cells.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct conversion; epigenetics; induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs); nuclear reprogramming; regenerative medicine; transdifferentiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26437595     DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cell Biol        ISSN: 0962-8924            Impact factor:   20.808


  7 in total

1.  Nascent Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Efficiently Generate Entirely iPSC-Derived Mice while Expressing Differentiation-Associated Genes.

Authors:  Bhishma Amlani; Yiyuan Liu; Taotao Chen; Ly-Sha Ee; Peter Lopez; Adriana Heguy; Effie Apostolou; Sang Yong Kim; Matthias Stadtfeld
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to brown adipocytes by small chemical compounds.

Authors:  Yukimasa Takeda; Yoshinori Harada; Toshikazu Yoshikawa; Ping Dai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Cellular reprogramming for clinical cartilage repair.

Authors:  Britta J H Driessen; Colin Logie; Lucienne A Vonk
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 4.  The Immunogenicity and Immune Tolerance of Pluripotent Stem Cell Derivatives.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Wenjuan Li; Xuemei Fu; Yang Xu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Pluripotent Stem Cells for Retinal Tissue Engineering: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Ratnesh Singh; Oscar Cuzzani; François Binette; Hal Sternberg; Michael D West; Igor O Nasonkin
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Double sperm cloning (DSC) is a promising strategy in mammalian genetic engineering and stem cell research.

Authors:  Zhi-Ping Zhang; Jun-Tao Zhang; Shu-Cheng Huang; Xiu-Yuan He; Li-Xin Deng
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  SUPT4H1-edited stem cell therapy rescues neuronal dysfunction in a mouse model for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Park; Areum Han; Ji Yeon Kim; Jiwoo Choi; Hee Sook Bae; Gyu-Bon Cho; Hyejung Shin; Eun Ji Shin; Kang-In Lee; Seokjoong Kim; Jae Young Lee; Jihwan Song
Journal:  NPJ Regen Med       Date:  2022-01-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.