Literature DB >> 26437089

Soil Methane and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes from Cropland and Riparian Buffers in Different Hydrogeomorphic Settings.

P A Jacinthe, P Vidon, K Fisher, X Liu, M E Baker.   

Abstract

Riparian buffers contribute to the mitigation of nutrient pollution in agricultural landscapes, but there is concern regarding their potential to be hot spots of greenhouse gas production. This study compared soil CO and CH fluxes in adjacent crop fields and riparian buffers (a flood-prone forest and a flood-protected grassland along an incised channel) and examined the impact of water table depth (WTD) and flood events on the variability of gas fluxes in riparian zones. Results showed significantly ( < 0.001) higher CO emission in riparian areas than in adjoining croplands (6.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.6 ± 0.5 Mg CO-C ha yr; mean ± SE). Daily flux of CO and soil temperature were significantly related ( < 0.002), with Q values ranging between 1.75 and 2.53. Significant relationships ( < 0.05) were found between CH daily flux and WTD. Flood events resulted in enhanced CH emission (up to +44.5 mg CH-C m d in a swale) under warm soil conditions (>22°C), but the effect of flooding was less pronounced in early spring (emission <1.06 mg CH-C m d), probably due to low soil temperature. Although CH flux direction alternated at all sites, overall the croplands and the flood-affected riparian forest were CH sources, with annual emission averaging +0.04 ± 0.17 and +0.92 ± 1.6 kg CH-C ha, respectively. In the riparian forest, a topographic depression (<8% of the total area) accounted for 78% of the annual CH emission, underscoring the significance of landscape heterogeneity on CH dynamics in riparian buffers. The nonflooded riparian grassland, however, was a net CH sink (-1.08 ± 0.22 kg CH-C ha yr), probably due to the presence of subsurface tile drains and a dredged/incised channel at that study site. Although these hydrological alterations may have contributed to improvement in the CH sink strength of the riparian grassland, this must be weighed against the water quality maintenance functions and other ecological services provided by riparian buffers.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26437089     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2015.01.0014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  Short-term spatial and temporal variability in greenhouse gas fluxes in riparian zones.

Authors:  P Vidon; S Marchese; M Welsh; S McMillan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Watershed 'Chemical Cocktails': Forming Novel Elemental Combinations in Anthropocene Fresh Waters.

Authors:  Sujay S Kaushal; Arthur J Gold; Susana Bernal; Tammy A Newcomer Johnson; Kelly Addy; Amy Burgin; Douglas A Burns; Ashley A Coble; Eran Hood; Yuehan Lu; Paul Mayer; Elizabeth C Minor; Andrew W Schroth; Philippe Vidon; Henry Wilson; Marguerite A Xenopoulos; Thomas Doody; Joseph Galella; Phillip Goodling; Katherine Haviland; Shahan Haq; Barret Wessel; Kelsey Wood; Norbert Jaworski; Kenneth T Belt
Journal:  Biogeochemistry       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.825

Review 3.  Methanobactin and the Link between Copper and Bacterial Methane Oxidation.

Authors:  Alan A DiSpirito; Jeremy D Semrau; J Colin Murrell; Warren H Gallagher; Christopher Dennison; Stéphane Vuilleumier
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Soil N2O and CH4 emissions from fodder maize production with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation.

Authors:  Jerry C Dlamini; L M Cardenas; E H Tesfamariam; R M Dunn; J Evans; J M B Hawkins; M S A Blackwell; A L Collins
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.993

5.  Soil CO2 emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation.

Authors:  J C Dlamini; L M Cardenas; E H Tesfamariam; R M Dunn; J Evans; J M B Hawkins; M S A Blackwell; A L Collins
Journal:  Agrofor Syst       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.