A John Baksi1, Justin E Davies2, Nearchos Hadjiloizou2, Resham Baruah2, Beth Unsworth2, Rodney A Foale2, Olga Korolkova3, Jennifer H Siggers3, Darrel P Francis2, Jamil Mayet2, Kim H Parker3, Alun D Hughes4. 1. International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK; Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, London, UK. 2. International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, & Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK. 3. Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, UK. 4. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: alun.hughes@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Wave reflection may be an important influence on blood pressure, but the extent to which reflections undergo attenuation during retrograde propagation has not been studied. We quantified retrograde transmission of a reflected wave created by occlusion of the left femoral artery in man. METHODS: 20 subjects (age 31-83 years; 14 male) underwent invasive measurement of pressure and flow velocity with a sensor-tipped intra-arterial wire at multiple locations distal to the proximal aorta before, during and following occlusion of the left femoral artery by thigh cuff inflation. A numerical model of the circulation was also used to predict reflected wave transmission. Wave reflection was measured as the ratio of backward to forward wave energy (WRI) and the ratio of peak backward to forward pressure (Pb/Pf). RESULTS: Cuff inflation caused a marked reflection which was largest at 5-10 cm from the cuff (change (Δ) in WRI=0.50 (95% CI 0.38, 0.62); p<0.001, ΔPb/Pf=0.23 (0.18-0.29); p<0.001). The magnitude of the cuff-induced reflection decreased progressively at more proximal locations and was barely discernible at sites>40 cm from the cuff including in the proximal aorta. Numerical modelling gave similar predictions to those observed experimentally. CONCLUSIONS: Reflections due to femoral artery occlusion are markedly attenuated by the time they reach the proximal aorta. This is due to impedance mismatches of bifurcations traversed in the backward direction. This degree of attenuation is inconsistent with the idea of a large discrete reflected wave arising from the lower limb and propagating back into the aorta.
BACKGROUND: Wave reflection may be an important influence on blood pressure, but the extent to which reflections undergo attenuation during retrograde propagation has not been studied. We quantified retrograde transmission of a reflected wave created by occlusion of the left femoral artery in man. METHODS: 20 subjects (age 31-83 years; 14 male) underwent invasive measurement of pressure and flow velocity with a sensor-tipped intra-arterial wire at multiple locations distal to the proximal aorta before, during and following occlusion of the left femoral artery by thigh cuff inflation. A numerical model of the circulation was also used to predict reflected wave transmission. Wave reflection was measured as the ratio of backward to forward wave energy (WRI) and the ratio of peak backward to forward pressure (Pb/Pf). RESULTS:Cuff inflation caused a marked reflection which was largest at 5-10 cm from the cuff (change (Δ) in WRI=0.50 (95% CI 0.38, 0.62); p<0.001, ΔPb/Pf=0.23 (0.18-0.29); p<0.001). The magnitude of the cuff-induced reflection decreased progressively at more proximal locations and was barely discernible at sites>40 cm from the cuff including in the proximal aorta. Numerical modelling gave similar predictions to those observed experimentally. CONCLUSIONS: Reflections due to femoral artery occlusion are markedly attenuated by the time they reach the proximal aorta. This is due to impedance mismatches of bifurcations traversed in the backward direction. This degree of attenuation is inconsistent with the idea of a large discrete reflected wave arising from the lower limb and propagating back into the aorta.
Authors: John V Tyberg; Justin E Davies; Zhibin Wang; William A Whitelaw; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Nigel G Shrive; Darryl P Francis; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jiun-Jr Wang Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Justin E Davies; Jordi Alastruey; Darrel P Francis; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Zachary I Whinnett; Charlotte H Manisty; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Keith Willson; Rodney A Foale; Iqbal S Malik; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jamil Mayet Journal: Hypertension Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Alessandra Borlotti; Ashraf W Khir; Ernst R Rietzschel; Marc L De Buyzere; Sebastian Vermeersch; Patrick Segers Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-06-07
Authors: Michael A Haidar; Mark A van Buchem; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; John D Gotal; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer; Gary F Mitchell Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Matthew K Armstrong; Martin G Schultz; Alun D Hughes; Dean S Picone; J Andrew Black; Nathan Dwyer; Philip Roberts-Thomson; James E Sharman Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.776
Authors: Avinash Kondiboyina; Hilary A Harrington; Joseph J Smolich; Michael M H Cheung; Jonathan P Mynard Journal: J Physiol Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 6.228
Authors: Junjing Su; Charmilie C Logan; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Niti M Dhutia; Carl Christian Danielsen; Ulf Simonsen Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 4.733