Literature DB >> 26436559

Effect of Splinting on Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions Made of Implants with Different Subgingival Alignments.

Elaheh Beyabanaki1,2, Ahmed Reza Shamshiri1, Marzieh Alikhasi1,2, Abbas Monzavi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Placement of implants at deeper levels of gingiva is sometimes inevitable because of issues like esthetics or bone availability. The accuracy of impressions may be affected in these situations. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of splinting and length of impression copings on the accuracy of impressions made of deeply placed implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A metal model with two parallel implants (Implantium; Dentium) was fabricated. One hundred and twenty impressions were made using the direct impression technique with and without splinting the impression copings (using short and long impression copings). Impressions were made of implants at three subgingival levels (1, 3, and 6 mm) using regular viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane). The impressions were poured with type IV dental stone. Displacements in the x, y, and z axes, as well as rotational discrepancies and interimplant distances were measured with a coordinate measuring machine. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and nonparametric adjusted rank transform tests.
RESULTS: There was less rotational displacement using longer impression copings at different subgingival positions of the implants, either with splinted or nonsplinted direct technique (p < 0.05). Also, the nonsplinted technique produced more accurate impressions at different apico-coronal levels of implants than the splinted technique using short impression copings (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of this study, longer impression copings yielded better results than shorter ones in both splinted and nonsplinted techniques. Also, nonsplinted short impression copings produced more accurate impressions than splinted short impression copings.
© 2015 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implant; direct impression technique; impression technique; splinting procedure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26436559     DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  6 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type.

Authors:  Marzieh Alikhasi; Hakime Siadat; Alireza Nasirpour; Mahya Hasanzade
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-06-04

2.  Restoring a Partial Maxillectomy Patient by an Implant-Supported Obturator on Two Implants: A Case Report.

Authors:  Elaheh Beyabanaki; Marzieh Alikhasi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-05

3.  Effect of multiple pouring on the accuracy of casts made using 3D-printed custom trays with different spacer thicknesses: A research study.

Authors:  Sara Tavakolizadeh; Mohammad Javad Razaghi; Pedram Pakravan; Majid Sedaghat Monfared; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Rahab Ghoveizi
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2020

4.  Reconstruction of a Mandibular Defect with Toronto Bridge Following Tumor Resection and Bone Graft: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hakimeh Siadat; Arash Khojasteh; Elaheh Beyabanaki
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-04-30

5.  Fabrication of a customized impression metal jig for an implant-supported overdenture with a milled bar.

Authors:  Yeganeh Memari; Azadeh Tadayonfard; Amir Fayaz; Elaheh Beyabanaki
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-04-06

6.  Restoring a post-traumatic partial edentulous mandible with the Toronto prosthesis: a clinical report.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nematollahi; Marzieh Alikhasi; Elaheh Beyabanaki
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2018-06-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.