Literature DB >> 26436244

Effects of Dram Shop, Responsible Beverage Service Training, and State Alcohol Control Laws on Underage Drinking Driver Fatal Crash Ratios.

Michael Scherer1, James C Fell1, Sue Thomas1, Robert B Voas1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to determine whether three minimum legal drinking age 21 (MLDA-21) laws-dram shop liability, responsible beverage service (RBS) training, and state control of alcohol sales-have had an impact on underage drinking and driving fatal crashes using annual state-level data, and compared states with strong laws to those with weak laws to examine their effect on beer consumption and fatal crash ratios.
METHODS: Using the Fatality Analysis Reporting System, we calculated the ratio of drinking to nondrinking drivers under age 21 involved in fatal crashes as our key outcome measure. We used structural equation modeling to evaluate the three MLDA-21 laws. We controlled for covariates known to impact fatal crashes including: 17 additional MLDA-21 laws; administrative license revocation; blood alcohol concentration limits of.08 and.10 for driving; seat belt laws; sobriety checkpoint frequency; unemployment rates; and vehicle miles traveled. Outcome variables, in addition to the fatal crash ratios of drinking to nondrinking drivers under age 21 included state per capita beer consumption.
RESULTS: Dram shop liability laws were associated with a 2.4% total effect decrease (direct effects: β =.019, p =.018). Similarly, RBS training laws were associated with a 3.6% total effect decrease (direct effect: β =.048, p =.001) in the ratio of drinking to nondrinking drivers under age 21 involved in fatal crashes. There was a significant relationship between dram shop liability law strength and per capita beer consumption, F (4, 1528) = 24.32, p <.001, partial η(2) =.016, showing states with strong dram shop liability laws (Mean (M) = 1.276) averaging significantly lower per capita beer consumption than states with weak laws (M = 1.340).
CONCLUSIONS: Dram shop liability laws and RBS laws were both associated with significantly reduced per capita beer consumption and fatal crash ratios. In practical terms, this means that dram shop liability laws are currently associated with saving an estimated 64 lives in the 45 jurisdictions that currently have the law. If the remaining 6 states adopted the dram shop law, an additional 9 lives could potentially be saved annually. Similarly, RBS training laws are associated with saving an estimated 83 lives in the 37 jurisdictions that currently have the laws. If the remaining 14 states adopted these RBS training laws, we estimate that an additional 28 lives could potentially be saved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dram shop laws; fatal crashes; minimum legal drinking age 21; responsible beverage service training; state control of alcohol retail sales

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26436244      PMCID: PMC4602396          DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev        ISSN: 1538-9588            Impact factor:   1.491


  19 in total

1.  Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Mildred M Maldonado-Molina; Linan Ma; Amy L Tobler; Kelli A Komro
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2007-09-29

2.  Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Mildred M Maldonado-Molina
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Why are sobriety checkpoints not widely adopted as an enforcement strategy in the United States?

Authors:  James C Fell; Susan A Ferguson; Allan F Williams; Michele Fields
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-11

4.  Complying with the minimum drinking age: effects of enforcement and training interventions.

Authors:  Alexander C Wagenaar; Traci L Toomey; Darin J Erickson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Effects of dram shop liability and enhanced overservice law enforcement initiatives on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: Two community guide systematic reviews.

Authors:  Veda Rammohan; Robert A Hahn; Randy Elder; Robert Brewer; Jonathan Fielding; Timothy S Naimi; Traci L Toomey; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Carlos Zometa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey.

Authors:  B F Grant; D A Dawson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse       Date:  1997

7.  Age of drinking onset and unintentional injury involvement after drinking.

Authors:  R W Hingson; T Heeren; A Jamanka; J Howland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Age of drinking onset and involvement in physical fights after drinking.

Authors:  R Hingson; T Heeren; R Zakocs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Alcohol involvement in fatal crashes under three crash exposure measures.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; A Scott Tippetts; Eduardo Romano; Deborah A Fisher; Tara Kelley-Baker
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.491

10.  The effect of random alcohol screening in reducing motor vehicle crash injuries.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of lowering the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving from 0.10 to 0.08 grams per deciliter in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Scherer; James C Fell
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  State alcohol policies, taxes, and availability as predictors of adolescent binge drinking trajectories into early adulthood.

Authors:  Brian J Fairman; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Denise L Haynie; Danping Liu; Risë B Goldstein; Ralph W Hingson; Stephen E Gilman
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Associations between Responsible Beverage Service Laws and Binge Drinking and Alcohol-Impaired Driving.

Authors:  Ann C Linde; Traci L Toomey; Julian Wolfson; Kathleen M Lenk; Rhonda Jones-Webb; Darin J Erickson
Journal:  J Alcohol Drug Educ       Date:  2016-08

4.  Sales to apparently alcohol-intoxicated customers and online responsible vendor training in recreational cannabis stores in a randomized trial.

Authors:  David B Buller; W Gill Woodall; Robert Saltz; Andrew Grayson; Sierra Svendsen; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  The Relationship Between the U.S. State Alcohol Policy Environment and Individuals' Experience of Secondhand Effects: Alcohol Harms Due to Others' Drinking.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Won K Cook; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Deidre Patterson; William C Kerr; Ziming Xuan; Timothy S Naimi
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Administrative license suspension: Does length of suspension matter?

Authors:  James C Fell; Michael Scherer
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.491

7.  Implementation and Effectiveness of an Online Responsible Vendor Training Program for Recreational Marijuana Stores in Colorado, Oregon, and Washington State.

Authors:  David B Buller; W Gill Woodall; Robert Saltz; Andrew Grayson; Mary Klein Buller
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 May/Jun

8.  Randomized Trial Testing an Online Responsible Vendor Training in Recreational Marijuana Stores in the United States.

Authors:  David B Buller; W Gill Woodall; Robert Saltz; Andrew Grayson; Mary Klein Buller; Gary R Cutter; Sierra Svendsen; Xia Liu
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Association between a delay in driving licensure and driving while impaired and riding with an impaired driver among emerging adults.

Authors:  Federico E Vaca; Kaigang Li; Denise L Haynie; Bruce Simons-Morton; Eduardo Romano; James C Fell
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.455

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.