| Literature DB >> 26436143 |
Robert W Dickey1, Steven M Plakas2, Edward L E Jester3, Kathleen R El Said4, Jan N Johannessen5, Leanne J Flewelling6, Paula Scott7, Dan G Hammond8, Frances M Van Dolah9, Tod A Leighfield10, Marie-Yasmine Bottein Dachraoui11, John S Ramsdell12, Richard H Pierce13, Mike S Henry14, Mark A Poli, Calvin Walker, Jan Kurtz, Jerome Naar, Daniel G Baden, Steve M Musser, Kevin D White, Penelope Truman, Aaron Miller, Timothy P Hawryluk, Marleen M Wekell, David Stirling, Michael A Quilliam, Jung K Lee.
Abstract
A thirteen-laboratory comparative study tested the performance of four methods as alternatives to mouse bioassay for the determination of brevetoxins in shellfish. The methods were N2a neuroblastoma cell assay, two variations of the sodium channel receptor binding assay, competitive ELISA, and LC/MS. Three to five laboratories independently performed each method using centrally prepared spiked and naturally incurred test samples. Competitive ELISA and receptor binding (96-well format) compared most favorably with mouse bioassay. Between-laboratory relative standard deviations (RSDR) ranged from 10 to 20% for ELISA and 14 to 31% for receptor binding. Within-laboratory (RSDr) ranged from 6 to 15% for ELISA, and 5 to 31% for receptor binding. Cell assay was extremely sensitive but data variation rendered it unsuitable for statistical treatment. LC/MS performed as well as ELISA on spiked test samples but was inordinately affected by lack of toxin-metabolite standards, uniform instrumental parameters, or both, on incurred test samples. The ELISA and receptor binding assay are good alternatives to mouse bioassay for the determination of brevetoxins in shellfish.Entities:
Year: 2004 PMID： 26436143 PMCID： PMC4591916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Harmful Algae 2002 (2002)