Literature DB >> 26435808

An Overview and Update of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia for Primary Care Physicians.

Austin Granatowicz1, Caroline I Piatek2, Elizabeth Moschiano3, Ihab El-Hemaidi4, Joel D Armitage5, Mojtaba Akhtari2.   

Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) accounts for approximately 15% of adult leukemias. Forty percent of patients with CML are asymptomatic, in whom the disease is detected solely based on laboratory abnormalities. Since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in 2001, CML has become a chronic disease for the majority of patients. Primary care physicians may be the first to recognize a new diagnosis of CML. In patients with known CML, the primary care physician may be the first to detect disease progression or adverse effects to therapy. This article provides an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnostic approach, and treatment considerations of CML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive; Primary Health Care

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435808      PMCID: PMC4591383          DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.2015.36.5.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Fam Med        ISSN: 2005-6443


INTRODUCTION

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) accounts for approximately 15% of adult leukemias, with an estimated 6,660 new cases of CML diagnosed in the United States in 2015.1) Although the median age of diagnosis is 67 years, CML may present at any age.2) The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has transformed CML from a fatal disease into a chronic disease for the majority of patients. Prior to 1983, the 8-year survival of CML was less than 15%. The 8-year survival improved from 42% to 65% from 1983 to 2000 with the use of interferon-α-based therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) therapy. With the introduction of TKI therapy in 2001, the 8-year survival is now 87% and continues to improve with the use of second- and third-generation TKI therapy.3) Given the dramatic decrease in the number of deaths in CML patients and the stable incidence, the prevalence of CML continues to increase. The estimated prevalence of CML in the United States was approximately 70,000 in 2010 and is expected to increase to approximately 112,000 in 2020.4)

PATHOGENESIS

CML is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder characterized by the presence of a balanced genetic translocation of chromosomes 22 and 9, termed the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome (Figure 1). The resulting breakpoint cluster region-Abelson murine leukemia (BCR-ABL) fusion oncogene is translated into the BCR-ABL oncoprotein.5) BCR-ABL is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that activates a number of signal-transduction pathways that affect the growth and survival of hematopoietic cells.6)
Figure 1

The Philadelphia chromosome. ABL, Abelson murine leukemia; BCR, breakpoint cluster region.

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS AND STAGING

CML is classified into three different phases: chronic, accelerated, and blast (Table 1).789) The natural history of CML is a chronic phase for three to five years followed by rapid progression to the fatal blast phase. In two-thirds of patients, the blast phase is proceeded by an accelerated phase.
Table 1

Stages of chronic myeloid leukemia

WHO, World Health Organization.

*Most commonly used in clinical trials. †Most commonly used by pathologists.

Approximately 85% of patients with CML are diagnosed in the chronic phase.10) Forty percent of patients with chronic phase CML are asymptomatic with the diagnosis made solely based on an abnormal blood count.6) Among the patients who have symptoms, complaints are usually related to anemia and splenomegaly; these include fatigue, weight loss, anorexia, early satiety, and left upper quadrant pain or fullness. Other less common symptoms include thrombosis or bleeding from thrombocytopenia or platelet dysfunction. Splenomegaly is the most common finding on physical exam and is present in over half of patients.11)

DIAGNOSIS

Unexplained leukocytosis with left shift (immature myeloid cells including myelocytes, promyelocytes or blasts), basophilia, and splenomegaly are suggestive of CML (Figure 2). The differential diagnosis includes leukemoid reaction (due to infection or inflammation), Ph negative myeloproliferative disorder, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and proliferative myelodysplastic syndrome. On occasion, CML may present as an isolated thrombocytosis. The diagnosis of CML may be confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR-ABL performed on the peripheral blood. However, bone marrow aspiration with cytogenetic analysis (karyotype) is required to appropriately stage as the chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase and to identify chromosomal abnormalities that are not detectable with FISH for BCR-ABL (Figures 3, 4).12)
Figure 2

Peripheral blood of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia showing leukocytosis with circulating immature myeloid cells (Wright-Giemsa stain, ×4).

Figure 3

Bone marrow aspirate of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia showing a spectrum of immature myeloid cells including blasts and promyelocytes (Wright-Giemsa stain, ×20).

Figure 4

Evaluation of suspected CML. CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; BCR, breakpoint cluster region; ABL, Abelson murine leukemia.

TREATMENT

TKI therapy has transformed the outcomes of patients with CML over the last 15 years. TKIs interfere with the interaction between the BCR-ABL oncoprotein and adenosine triphosphate, thereby blocking proliferation of the malignant clone. There are currently three TKIs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the first-line treatment of chronic phase CML: imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. Imatinib was the first TKI to be approved in 2001. In the landmark study comparing imatinib to combination interferon and cytarabine therapy, imatinib had superior tolerability, hematologic and cytogenetic responses, and decreased likelihood of progression to accelerated phase or blast phase CML.13) The choice of first-line therapy depends on the Sokal or Hasford risk stratification score, patient age, ability to tolerate therapy, and medical comorbidities. The Sokal score includes age, spleen size, platelet count, and blast percentage.14) The Hasford score also incorporates the percent of eosinophils and basophils.15) Compared to imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib have improved efficacy and may be preferred in intermediate- and high-risk patients based on the Sokal or Hasford risk stratification scores.16171819) In patients who are refractory or intolerant to first-line TKI therapy, second-line options include second-generation TKIs, dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib. Ponatinib is a third-generation TKI and is the only TKI that is effective in patients who harbor the threonine-to-isoleucine mutation at position 315 (T315I). Previously, ponatinib was considered a third-line treatment option. However, due to the associated risk of arterial and venous thromboembolism, its use is generally reserved for patients harboring the T315I mutation.2021) All TKI agents are administered orally. The initial dosing and common and notable adverse effects are summarized in Table 2.2223) The management of toxicities associated with TKI therapy is discussed elsewhere.1224) Patients with chronic phase CML are continued on TKI therapy indefinitely. Although discontinuation of TKI therapy with close molecular monitoring may be possible in selected patients, the discontinuation of TKI therapy should only been considered in the context of a clinical trial.122526)
Table 2

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors available for treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

The response to therapy is classified based on hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular responses (Table 3).12) Optimal responses to first-line TKI therapy include complete hematologic response with BCR-ABL1 transcript ≤10% (RT-PCR) and/or Ph positive cells ≤35% (bone marrow cytogenetics) at 3 months, BCR-ABL1 transcript <1% and/or no detectable Ph positive cells at 6 months, and BCR-ABL1 transcript ≤0.1% at 12 months. Failure of first-line TKI therapy is defined as failure to achieve a complete hematologic response and/or Ph positive cells >95% at 3 months, BCR-ABL1 transcript >10% and/or Ph positive cells >35% at 6 months, and BCR-ABL1 transcript >1% and/or Ph positive cells at 12 months. Loss of complete hematologic response, complete cytogenetic response, or major molecular response or presence of mutations or clonal evolution are also considered as treatment failure.8)
Table 3

Assessment response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

BCR, breakpoint cluster region; ABL, Abelson murine leukemia; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid.

Administration of the protein synthesis inhibitor omacetaxine is a treatment option for patients who have failure or intolerance to two or more TKIs, including patients who harbor the T315I mutation.2728) The accelerated or blast phases may be treated with an alternative TKI as a bridge to HSCT. HSCT is a potentially curative treatment in patients with CML, and HSCT evaluation is recommended for patients with the T315I mutation, failure or intolerance to two or more TKIs, or those with accelerated or blast phase CML.12)

PREGNANCY

Although most pregnancy outcomes are normal in patients exposed to imatinib, there is still a risk for serious fetal malformation with imatinib exposure.29) For this reason, discontinuation of TKI therapy is generally advised during pregnancy.12) For women who desire pregnancy, a planned pregnancy is preferred. Once a woman is in at least a major molecular response, then a two to three month washout period of TKI therapy is advised prior to conception. TKI therapy should be held during pregnancy and resumed immediately after birth. When treatment is needed during pregnancy due to a very high white blood cell (WBC) count, leukapheresis is preferred.30) Interferon may be used safely in pregnancy. However, its use is limited by toxicity and slow time to response.313233) The use of hydroxyurea also appears to be safe in pregnancy, but its use is typically reserved for pulse dosing to control very high WBC counts.30343536373839) Although the use of TKI appears to be safe in men fathering a child, patients should be advised that the data in this setting is limited.404142)

ROLE OF THE PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN

Primary care physicians may be the first to detect CML since 40% patients present only with an abnormal blood count.6) Thus, it is important for primary care physicians to be aware of the appropriate initial evaluation of patients with suspected CML. During the routine follow-up of other medical comorbidities, the primary care physician may be the first to detect new adverse effects to TKI therapy, treatment failure, or progression of disease. With recognition of the common and serious adverse effects of TKI therapy, the primary care physician may provide appropriate counseling or arrange for earlier follow-up with the patient's hematologist/oncologist for management. With the recognition of possible treatment failure or progression of disease from the chronic phase to the accelerated or blast phases (i.e., increasing WBC count), the primary care physician should arrange for the patient to been seen by his/her hematologist/oncologist promptly for further evaluation.
  35 in total

1.  Use of hydroxyurea and alpha-interferon in chronic myeloid leukemia during pregnancy: a case report.

Authors:  C Baykal; N Zengin; F Coşkun; N Güler; A Ayhan
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.196

2.  Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION).

Authors:  Hagop M Kantarjian; Neil P Shah; Jorge E Cortes; Michele Baccarani; Mohan B Agarwal; María Soledad Undurraga; Jianxiang Wang; Juan Julio Kassack Ipiña; Dong-Wook Kim; Michinori Ogura; Carolina Pavlovsky; Christian Junghanss; Jorge H Milone; Franck E Nicolini; Tadeusz Robak; Jan Van Droogenbroeck; Edo Vellenga; M Brigid Bradley-Garelik; Chao Zhu; Andreas Hochhaus
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Pregnancy during myelosuppressive treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  A Delmer; B Rio; F Bauduer; F Ajchenbaum; J P Marie; R Zittoun
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Successful pregnancies involving men with chronic myeloid leukaemia on imatinib therapy.

Authors:  Karthik Ramasamy; Janet Hayden; Ziyi Lim; Ghulam J Mufti; Aloysius Y L Ho
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  Use of hydroxyurea in chronic myeloid leukemia during pregnancy: a case report.

Authors:  M Patel; I A Dukes; J C Hull
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who maintain a complete molecular response after stopping imatinib treatment have evidence of persistent leukemia by DNA PCR.

Authors:  D M Ross; S Branford; J F Seymour; A P Schwarer; C Arthur; P A Bartley; C Slader; C Field; P Dang; R J Filshie; A K Mills; A P Grigg; J V Melo; T P Hughes
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial.

Authors:  François-Xavier Mahon; Delphine Réa; Joëlle Guilhot; François Guilhot; Françoise Huguet; Franck Nicolini; Laurence Legros; Aude Charbonnier; Agnès Guerci; Bruno Varet; Gabriel Etienne; Josy Reiffers; Philippe Rousselot
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  How I treat newly diagnosed chronic phase CML.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J E Sokal; E B Cox; M Baccarani; S Tura; G A Gomez; J E Robertson; C Y Tso; T J Braun; B D Clarkson; F Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias.

Authors:  J E Cortes; D-W Kim; J Pinilla-Ibarz; P le Coutre; R Paquette; C Chuah; F E Nicolini; J F Apperley; H J Khoury; M Talpaz; J DiPersio; D J DeAngelo; E Abruzzese; D Rea; M Baccarani; M C Müller; C Gambacorti-Passerini; S Wong; S Lustgarten; V M Rivera; T Clackson; C D Turner; F G Haluska; F Guilhot; M W Deininger; A Hochhaus; T Hughes; J M Goldman; N P Shah; H Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Economic Evaluations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jie Fu; Yuchen Liu; Houwen Lin; Bin Wu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  A Systematic Literature Review of the Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Rumjhum Agrawal; Joao Vieira; Jacqueline Ryan; Harish Negi; Tanvi Rajput; Regina Corbin; Ricardo Viana
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.558

Review 3.  CD99 in malignant hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Atham Ali; Vijaya Pooja Vaikari; Houda Alachkar
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.249

4.  A Synergistic Combination Against Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Intra-molecular Mechanism of Communication in BCR-ABL1 Resistance.

Authors:  Ahmed A El Rashedy; Patrick Appiah-Kubi; Mahmoud E S Soliman
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  Assessment of Dasatinib Versus Nilotinib as Upfront Therapy for Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Qatar: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Ahmad Adel; Dina Abushanab; Anas Hamad; Mohammad Abdulla; Mohamed Izham; Mohamed Yassin
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  The association between FOXO3a rs4946936 gene polymorphism and the levels of FOXO3a among chronic granulocytic leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate.

Authors:  Shinta Oktya Wardhani; Hani Susianti; Puji Rahayu; Yuyun Prabowowati Yueniwati; Jonny Karunia Fajar
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Understanding and Challenges in Taking Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors among Malaysian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Qualitative Study

Authors:  Yik Ming Lim; Wei Lerk Eng; Huan Keat Chan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  Atypical Presentation of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.

Authors:  Katelyn Mariko Updyke; Joan Morales-Lappot; Theodore Lee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 9.  Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Presenting With Isolated Thrombocytosis: A Systematic Review and a Case From Our Institution.

Authors:  Dawood Findakly; Waqas Arslan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 10.  MiR-144: A New Possible Therapeutic Target and Diagnostic/Prognostic Tool in Cancers.

Authors:  Omid Kooshkaki; Zohre Rezaei; Meysam Rahmati; Parviz Vahedi; Afshin Derakhshani; Oronzo Brunetti; Amir Baghbanzadeh; Behzad Mansoori; Nicola Silvestris; Behzad Baradaran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.