BACKGROUND: Rates of neurological impairment among extremely low birth weight children (ELBW [<1 kg]) have decreased since 2000; however, their functioning is unexamined. OBJECTIVE: To compare motor and cognitive functioning of ELBW children with neurological impairment, including cerebral palsy and severe hypotonia/hypertonia, between two periods: 1990 to 1999 (n=83) and 2000 to 2005 (n=34). METHODS: Measures of function at 20 months corrected age included the Mental and Psychomotor Developmental Indexes of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Gross Motor Functional Classification System as primary outcomes and individual motor function items as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Analysis failed to reveal significant differences for the primary outcomes, although during 2000 to 2005, sitting significantly improved in children with neurological impairment (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Decreases in rates of neurological impairment among ELBW children have been accompanied by a suggestion of improved motor function, although cognitive function has not changed.
BACKGROUND: Rates of neurological impairment among extremely low birth weight children (ELBW [<1 kg]) have decreased since 2000; however, their functioning is unexamined. OBJECTIVE: To compare motor and cognitive functioning of ELBW children with neurological impairment, including cerebral palsy and severe hypotonia/hypertonia, between two periods: 1990 to 1999 (n=83) and 2000 to 2005 (n=34). METHODS: Measures of function at 20 months corrected age included the Mental and Psychomotor Developmental Indexes of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and the Gross Motor Functional Classification System as primary outcomes and individual motor function items as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Analysis failed to reveal significant differences for the primary outcomes, although during 2000 to 2005, sitting significantly improved in children with neurological impairment (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Decreases in rates of neurological impairment among ELBW children have been accompanied by a suggestion of improved motor function, although cognitive function has not changed.
Authors: B R Vohr; L L Wright; A M Dusick; L Mele; J Verter; J J Steichen; N P Simon; D C Wilson; S Broyles; C R Bauer; V Delaney-Black; K A Yolton; B E Fleisher; L A Papile; M D Kaplan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: M S Kramer; R W Platt; S W Wen; K S Joseph; A Allen; M Abrahamowicz; B Blondel; G Bréart Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Barbara Schmidt; Peter J Anderson; Lex W Doyle; Deborah Dewey; Ruth E Grunau; Elizabeth V Asztalos; Peter G Davis; Win Tin; Diane Moddemann; Alfonso Solimano; Arne Ohlsson; Keith J Barrington; Robin S Roberts Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martin Bax; Murray Goldstein; Peter Rosenbaum; Alan Leviton; Nigel Paneth; Bernard Dan; Bo Jacobsson; Diane Damiano Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.449