Literature DB >> 26435622

Prevalence of Spaced and Non-Spaced Dentition and Occlusal Relationship of Primary Dentition and its Relation to Malocclusion in School Children of Davangere.

Girish R Shavi1, Neel V Hiremath2, Ravikumar Shukla3, Praveen Kumar Bali4, Swapnil Kumar Jain5, Sunil Lingaraj Ajagannanavar6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was carried to determine the relation of spacing, closed dentition, and occlusal relation with malocclusion in the primary dentition in children during deciduous dentition period among school children of Davangere.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 945 school children all having deciduous teeth were included in the study. Informed consent for the child's participation is taken from the school principal. The dentition was examined under natural daylight, and the data was recorded. All the school children were screened for spaced and non-spaced dentition, molar and canine relationship.
RESULTS: The results concluded that most of the children showed spaced dentition (82.1%) when compared to non-spaced dentition (17.9%) with males shown more spaced dentition than compared to females. Among all children examined for molar and canine relation, flush terminal molar relation (65%) showed highest among all molar relation followed by mesial step (31%) and distal step (4%), and Class I canine relation (90%) was significant followed by Class II (6%) and Class III canine relation (4%). No significant difference was seen between right and left side.
CONCLUSION: The study concludes that determining the malocclusion and its correction at an early age helps in preventing a future complication in permanent dentition since stable primary occlusion leads to ideal occlusion in permanent dentition. Spacing, i.e., primate and physiologic space with the terminal molar relation in primary dentition indicates proper alignment of the permanent dentition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed dentition; malocclusion; occlusal relation; primary dentition; spacing

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435622      PMCID: PMC4589725     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


Introduction

Nature is infinite in variety. The occlusal relationship and spacing in deciduous dentition is known to have a vital bearing on the setting up of the normal occlusal relationship in permanent dentition.1 The ideal occlusion and spacing in primary dentition acts as mirror for the prevalence of malocclusion in the permanent dentition. The properly placed teeth in dental arch help in maintaining the better health of oral cavity and the supporting structures, but also influence the personality of the children. Malocclusion not only compromises maintaining better hygiene and also the health of investing tissue, but can also lead to behavioral (psychological) and social problems. Malocclusion is a problem affecting a disproportionately large number of Indian children.2 The canine relation in the primary dentition is known to influence the canine relation in permanent dentition because it is thought to be a stable relation in the deciduous period.3 Davies et al. explained that the canine is considered to be cornerstone, which is important for developing occlusion. In permanent dentition, canine helps in lateral excursive movement by guiding the mandible.4 The prevalence of malocclusion in India varies from 20% to 43%. Although there is plenty of literature concerning the prevalence and type of malocclusion is quoted in literature, the paucity of information is present on malocclusion in preschool children and its correlation with crowding, spacing, and closed dentition.5 Hence, the present study was carried out to known the impact of occlusal relationship and spacing on malocclusion in the primary dentition.

Aims and objectives

The objective of the study was to assess spacing (physiological and primate spaces) in anterior region of both maxilla and mandible and to determine the molar and canine relation in school children of Davangere during deciduous dentition period.

Materials and Methods

A total of 945 school children below the age of 6 years all having deciduous teeth were included in the study. The nature of the study was explained, and informed consent for the child’s participation is taken from the school principal. All the data recorded were screened under natural daylight. All the school children were screened for spaced and non-spaced dentition, molar and canine relationship.

Canine relation

Canine relationship was documented as follows: Class I: The tip of the upper primary canine in the same vertical plane as the distal surface of the lower primary canine in centric occlusion. Class II: The tip of the upper primary canine in anterior relationship to the distal surface of the lower primary canine in centric occlusion. Class III: The tip of the upper primary canine in posterior relationship to the distal surface of the lower primary canine in centric occlusion.

Molar relation

Distal surface maxillary and mandibular second molar are considered for recording occlusion in primary dentition Flush terminal plane: Distal surface of maxillary and mandibular second molar lie in the same vertical plane Mesial step molar relation: Distal surface of mandibular second molar is ahead then that of maxillary second molar Distal step molar relation: Distal surface of mandibular second molar is distal to the distal surface of a maxillary second molar.

Inclusion criteria

Children age <6 years Complete set of primary teeth Presence of spacing and non-spaced dentition Other abnormalities such as developmental disturbances of teeth, oligodontia, syndromes, and early childhood caries.

Exclusion criteria

Eruption of any permanent first molar/incisor tooth not taken as subject Grossly decayed teeth.

Results

A total sample of 945 school children’s were screened to find out the relationship of malocclusion with spaced or non-spaced dentition and occlusion patterns. Of 945 school children’s participated in the study, 53.9% of them were males and 46.1% of them were females as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Distribution of study subjects according to gender.

Distribution of study subjects according to gender. Age distribution in the present study, was considered till 6 years were a complete set of the deciduous dentition was present. The age distribution is as follows (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of study subjects according to age.

Distribution of study subjects according to age. 157 (16.6%) of them were 2-3 years 232 (24.5%) of them were 3-4 years 247 (26.1%) of them were 4-5 years 309 (32.6%) of them were 5-6 years. About 82.1% of them have spaced dentition out of which 54% of males have spacing and 46% of females have spacing and 17.9% of them have non-spaced dentition out of which 53% of males and 47% of females of non-spaced dentition. The distribution of alignment was shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Alignment distribution.

Alignment distribution. Of the 945 children examined, 75% had flush terminal plane, 4% distal step, and 21% mesial step molar relation. Percentage distribution among different age groups has shown flush terminal relation recorded highest among all the age groups followed by mesial step and distal step molar relation. Among the age of 2-3 years, 75% flush terminal molar relation, 21% mesial step molar relation and 4% distal step molar relation. Among 3-4 years, 71% flush terminal molar relation, 25% mesial step molar relation, and 4% distal step molar relation. Among 4-5 years, 67% flush terminal molar relation, 28% mesial step molar relation, and 5% distal step molar relation. Among 5-6 years, 65% flush terminal molar relation, 31% mesial step molar relation, and 4% distal step molar relation. No significant difference was noted between right and left side. Table 4 shows the percentage and correlation of the occlusal relationship of primary second molar for every age group.
Table 4

Molar relation.

Molar relation. Of 945 children screened, 90% had Class I canine relation, 6% had Class II canine relation, and 4% had Class III canine relation. Percentage distribution among the different age groups has shown Class I relation recorded highest followed by Class II and Class III canine relation. Among 2-3 years, 90.7% of them have Class I canine relation, 6.4% of them have Class II, and 2.9% of them have Class III canine relation. Among 3-4 years, 88.4% of them have Class I canine relation, 7.5% of them have Class II, and 4.1% of them have canine Class III relation. Among 4-5 years, 84.5% have Class I, 11.7% have Class II, and 4.8% of them have Class III canine relation. Among 5-6 years, 82.4% have Class I, 9.4% have Class II, and 8.1% have Class III canine relation. No significant difference was noted between right and left side. Table 5 shows the percentage and correlation of the occlusal relationship of primary second molar for every age group.
Table 5

Canine relation.

Canine relation.

Discussion

Early recognition of conditions predisposing young children to malocclusions is in the hands of primary care providers who for practical purposes are general practitioners and the pediatric dentist. It is important that conditions that predispose to develop a malocclusion of the permanent dentition be detected early in the primary dentition so the early interceptive procedure can be applied to prevent its further consequences.6 The presence of spacing or crowding and occlusion in the primary dentition and its relation to the development of malocclusion has been the long subject of discussion. There are many studies done regarding correlation of spacing or crowding with the malocclusion in pre-school children but still the knowledge of it is scares. The development of malocclusion starts from the primary dentition, so it is very important to know the occlusion in the primary dentition, as well as the changes of occlusal pattern, during the period of deciduous dentition. According to Bishara et al., a marked arch width (inter canine and intermolar width) expansion occurs significantly between 3 and 5 years of age in both maxilla and mandible. Therefore, the school children’s included in current study was limited to 6 years.7 Joshi and Makhija conducted study on 3-6 years school children in Gujarat and concluded that non-spaced dentition was less common in school children when compared to spaced dentition. An significant difference was noticed in which amount of spacing was found to be greater in males.8 Almost similar results were obtained in the present study. Im et al. concluded that maxilla showed more spacing when compared to mandible irrespective of sex. El-Nofely et al. assumption for spacing can be either due to small mesiodistal or wide inter canine width. Leighton’s hypothesis suggests that for the proper alignment of permanent teeth in mandibular arch, the amount of spacing in primary dentition should be of 6 mm or more.9 Traits of occlusal relationship in primary dentition can likely serve as a prognosticator for occlusal features in permanent dentition. The present study assessed for terminal molar and canine relation in 3-6 years school children. The study concluded that flush terminal molar relation recorded highest (74%) followed by mesial step (22%) and then distal step (4%) in all the age groups but with increase mesial step molar relation increased to 33% at the age of 6 years. Similar results were obtained by Baume showed that flush terminal plane (76%) is more commonly seen followed by mesial step (14%) and then distal step molar relation (10%). The study results shown highest bilateral flush terminal plane molar relation in children’s of Hyderabad (72.5%) and Chennai (74%) as concluded by Sriram et al.10 On contradictory, several other studies have shown that mesial step relation recorded highest followed by flush terminal plane and distal step. Bahadure et al. shown highest occurrence of mesial step molar relation (57.3%) followed by flush terminal plane (31.1%) and then the distal step molar relation (11.7%).3 Similar results were obtained by Ronald, Farsi, and Salama. The changes in the occlusion can be attributed to a combination of mesial migration of the lower arch and a mesial shift of the mandible, which is probably caused by growth.11 Considering canine relation, the most common relation found was Class I (90%) canine relation followed by Class II (6.4%) and Class III (3.6%) canine relation at the age of 2-3 years. At the age interval of 5-6 years Class I relation was found to be 82%, Class II relation was 9.8%, and Class III was 7.6%. Baidas et al. concluded that among the canine relation, Class I (90.1%) showed peak value succeeded by Class III (7.4%), and Class II (2.5%) relationship, which are similar to the present study. On the contradictory, Bahadure et al. concluded that among the canine relation, Class I (47.20%) showed highest value followed by Class II (42.83%) and Class III (9.97%). There were studies done on how spacing and occlusion is related to malocclusion and what were the possible reasons for the malocclusion. Howe et al. concluded that malocclusions were discripenancy in arch length and tooth size.12 The major reasons for the malocclusion may be due to the modern diet, which results in decreased inter-proximal wear and jaw growth. According to Profit et al. oral habits such as mouth breathing, thumb sucking might also be responsible for crowding in the arch.13

Conclusion

This study provides information of the prevalence of spacing and closed dentition, occlusion relation and its relation to a malocclusion. In the study, spaced dentition was more frequent the non-spaced dentition. Males have more percent of non-spaced dentition when compared to the females. The flush terminal plane molar relation was highest among all the age groups followed by mesial step and distal step molar relation with no significant difference was noted between right and left side among all the age groups. Hence, determining the malocclusion at its early age and early intervention procedure helps in preventing the problems at later stage.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition.

Authors:  M Malandris; E K Mahoney
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age.

Authors:  S E Bishara; J R Jakobsen; J Treder; A Nowak
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Age changes in the occlusal pattern of deciduous dentition.

Authors:  R S Nanda; I Khan; R Anand
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1973 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension.

Authors:  R P Howe; J A McNamara; K A O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1983-05

5.  Good occlusal practice in children's dentistry.

Authors:  S J Davies; R J Gray; I C Mackie
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Some observations on spacing in the normal deciduous dentition of 100 Indian children from Gujarat.

Authors:  M R Joshi; P G Makhija
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1984-04

7.  Occlusion of primary dentition in preschool children of Chennai and Hyderabad: A comparative study.

Authors:  C H Sriram; V Krishna Priya; N Sivakumar; K R Maheshwar Reddy; P Jitendra Babu; Pujita Reddy
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-01

8.  Occlusal traits of deciduous dentition of preschool children of Indian children.

Authors:  Rakesh N Bahadure; Nilima Thosar; Rahul Gaikwad
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10

9.  Prevalence of spaced and closed dentition and its relation to malocclusion in primary and permanent dentition.

Authors:  Suma Vinay; Vinayk Keshav; Shreya Sankalecha
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012-08-08
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Occlusal Traits of Primary Dentition among Pre-School Children of Mehsana District, North Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Shoba Fernandes; Dhvani Gordhanbhai Patel; Eraveni Ranadheer; Jayasudha Kalgudi; Jaysukh Santokì; Shaila Chaudhary
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

2.  Distribution of School Children Based on the Type of Terminal Plane in Primary Dentition: A Study among 3- to 5-year-old Children in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Anu; Bellamkonda Pavani; Dornadula Pavani; Beatrice Jx Liana; Firdose A Lubna; Yalagala V Saikrishna
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

3.  An Evaluation of Occlusal Relationship and Primate Space in Deciduous Dentition in Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Daya Srinivasan; Divya Loganathan; S Saravana Kumar; C Joe Louis; Senthil Eagappan; Divya Natarajan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

4.  Impact of surgical orthodontic treatment on quality of life in Chinese young adults with class III malocclusion: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jiaan Ni; Shaohua Song; Nuo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Prevalence of malocclusion in primary dentition in mainland China, 1988-2017: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lu Shen; Fang He; Cai Zhang; Haofeng Jiang; Jinhua Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prevalence of Malocclusion in Primary Dentition in Southeast Part of Haryana, India: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Kapil Sharma; Tanvi Bihani; Vineet Kumar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.