Literature DB >> 26435512

Mutational mapping of the transmembrane binding site of the G-protein coupled receptor TGR5 and binding mode prediction of TGR5 agonists.

Christoph G W Gertzen1, Lina Spomer2, Sander H J Smits3, Dieter Häussinger2, Verena Keitel4, Holger Gohlke5.   

Abstract

TGR5 (Gpbar-1, M-Bar) is a class A G-protein coupled bile acid-sensing receptor predominately expressed in brain, liver and gastrointestinal tract, and a promising drug target for the treatment of metabolic disorders. Due to the lack of a crystal structure of TGR5, the development of TGR5 agonists has been guided by ligand-based approaches so far. Three binding mode models of bile acid derivatives have been presented recently. However, they differ from one another in terms of overall orientation or with respect to the location and interactions of the cholane scaffold, or cannot explain all results from mutagenesis experiments. Here, we present an extended binding mode model based on an iterative and integrated computational and biological approach. An alignment of 68 TGR5 agonists based on this binding mode leads to a significant and good structure-based 3D QSAR model, which constitutes the most comprehensive structure-based 3D-QSAR study of TGR5 agonists undertaken so far and suggests that the binding mode model is a close representation of the "true" binding mode. The binding mode model is further substantiated in that effects predicted for eight mutations in the binding site agree with experimental analyses on the impact of these TGR5 variants on receptor activity. In the binding mode, the hydrophobic cholane scaffold of taurolithocholate orients towards the interior of the orthosteric binding site such that rings A and B are in contact with TM5 and TM6, the taurine side chain orients towards the extracellular opening of the binding site and forms a salt bridge with R79(EL1), and the 3-hydroxyl group forms hydrogen bonds with E169(5.44) and Y240(6.51). The binding mode thus differs in important aspects from the ones recently presented. These results are highly relevant for the development of novel, more potent agonists of TGR5 and should be a valuable starting point for the development of TGR5 antagonists, which could show antiproliferative effects in tumor cells.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7-Helix receptor; Cyclic AMP; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics simulations; Quantitative structure activity relationship; Structure model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26435512     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Chem        ISSN: 0223-5234            Impact factor:   6.514


  10 in total

1.  GPBAR1 Activation by C6-Substituted Hyodeoxycholane Analogues Protect against Colitis.

Authors:  Simona De Marino; Claudia Finamore; Michele Biagioli; Adriana Carino; Silvia Marchianò; Rosalinda Roselli; Cristina Di Giorgio; Martina Bordoni; Francesco Saverio Di Leva; Ettore Novellino; Chiara Cassiano; Vittorio Limongelli; Angela Zampella; Carmen Festa; Stefano Fiorucci
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Structural assemblies of the di- and oligomeric G-protein coupled receptor TGR5 in live cells: an MFIS-FRET and integrative modelling study.

Authors:  Annemarie Greife; Suren Felekyan; Qijun Ma; Christoph G W Gertzen; Lina Spomer; Mykola Dimura; Thomas O Peulen; Christina Wöhler; Dieter Häussinger; Holger Gohlke; Verena Keitel; Claus A M Seidel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Identification of key amino acid residues in the hTGR5-nomilin interaction and construction of its binding model.

Authors:  Takashi Sasaki; Moeko Mita; Naho Ikari; Ayane Kuboyama; Shuzo Hashimoto; Tatsuya Kaneko; Masaji Ishiguro; Makoto Shimizu; Jun Inoue; Ryuichiro Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Discovery of ((1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)pyrrolidin-3-yl)ureidyl derivatives as selective non-steroidal agonists of the G-protein coupled bile acid receptor-1.

Authors:  Francesco Saverio Di Leva; Carmen Festa; Adriana Carino; Simona De Marino; Silvia Marchianò; Daniele Di Marino; Claudia Finamore; Maria Chiara Monti; Angela Zampella; Stefano Fiorucci; Vittorio Limongelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Isoform-specific Inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptors by Bile Salts.

Authors:  Angela Koch; Michele Bonus; Holger Gohlke; Nikolaj Klöcker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Semisynthetic Analogs of the Antibiotic Fidaxomicin-Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation.

Authors:  Andrea Dorst; Regina Berg; Christoph G W Gertzen; Daniel Schäfle; Katja Zerbe; Myriam Gwerder; Simon D Schnell; Peter Sander; Holger Gohlke; Karl Gademann
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Therapeutic Opportunities of GPBAR1 in Cholestatic Diseases.

Authors:  Fangling Zhang; Xiaolin Xiao; Yong Li; Hefei Wu; Xinyu Deng; Yinxiao Jiang; Wenwen Zhang; Jian Wang; Xiao Ma; Yanling Zhao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Chalcone-based Selective Inhibitors of a C4 Plant Key Enzyme as Novel Potential Herbicides.

Authors:  G T T Nguyen; G Erlenkamp; O Jäck; A Küberl; M Bott; F Fiorani; H Gohlke; G Groth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Recent Trends and Applications of Molecular Modeling in GPCR⁻Ligand Recognition and Structure-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Xiaojing Yuan; Yechun Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  In Silico Workflow for the Discovery of Natural Products Activating the G Protein-Coupled Bile Acid Receptor 1.

Authors:  Benjamin Kirchweger; Jadel M Kratz; Angela Ladurner; Ulrike Grienke; Thierry Langer; Verena M Dirsch; Judith M Rollinger
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.221

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.