Literature DB >> 26433499

Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery.

Michael Robson1, Martina Murphy2, Fionnuala Byrne2.   

Abstract

Quality assurance in labor and delivery is needed. The method must be simple and consistent, and be of universal value. It needs to be clinically relevant, robust, and prospective, and must incorporate epidemiological variables. The 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) is a simple method providing a common starting point for further detailed analysis within which all perinatal events and outcomes can be measured and compared. The system is demonstrated in the present paper using data for 2013 from the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Interpretation of the classification can be easily taught. The standard table can provide much insight into the philosophy of care in the population of women studied and also provide information on data quality. With standardization of audit of events and outcomes, any differences in either sizes of groups, events or outcomes can be explained only by poor data collection, significant epidemiological variables, or differences in practice. In April 2015, WHO proposed that the TGCS (also known as the Robson classification) is used as a global standard for assessing, monitoring, and comparing cesarean delivery rates within and between healthcare facilities.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10-Group Classification System (TGCS); Audit; Cesarean delivery; Induction of labor; Quality assurance; Robson classification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433499     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  22 in total

1.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kjersti Engen Marsdal; Ingvil Krarup Sørbye; Lise C Gaudernack; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Mode of Delivery according to Leisure Time Physical Activity before and during Pregnancy: A Multicenter Cohort Study of Low-Risk Women.

Authors:  Emilie Nor Nielsen; Per Kragh Andersen; Hanne Kristine Hegaard; Mette Juhl
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2017-03-13

4.  Caesarean Section Rates and Activity-Based Funding in Northern Norway: A Model-Based Study Using the World Health Organization's Recommendation.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Tove Elisabeth Svee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Association between epidural analgesia and indications for intrapartum caesarean delivery in group 1 of the 10-group classification system at a tertiary maternity hospital, Shanghai, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rong Lin; Peng Shi; Haibing Li; Zhiqiang Liu; Zhendong Xu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race: a Population-Based Analysis Using the Robson Ten-Group Classification System.

Authors:  Elise G Valdes
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-08-17

7.  Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Cate Nagle; Bridie Kent; Debra Bick; Rebecca Lindberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Lithuania's experience in reducing caesarean sections among nulliparas.

Authors:  Justina Kacerauskiene; Meile Minkauskiene; Tahir Mahmood; Egle Bartuseviciene; Dalia R Railaite; Arnoldas Bartusevicius; Mindaugas Kliucinskas; Ruta J Nadisauskiene; Kastytis Smigelskas; Kornelija Maciuliene; Grazina Drasutiene; Diana Ramasauskaite
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Teaching and performing audits on caesarean delivery reduce the caesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lesieur; Julie Blanc; Anderson Loundou; Arnaud Claquin; Michele Marcot; Helene Heckenroth; Florence Bretelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in pregnant women undergoing cesarean delivery according to body mass index: Retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.

Authors:  Efrain Riveros-Perez; Jacob McClendon; Jennifer Xiong; Thomas Cheriyan; Alexander Rocuts
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.