Literature DB >> 26433431

Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial Comparing Daptomycin to Vancomycin for the Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections in an Observation Unit.

George J Shaw1, Jason M Meunier2, Joseph Korfhagen2, Beth Wayne2, Kimberly Hart2, Christopher J Lindsell2, Gregory Fermann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasing in complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) presenting to emergency departments (EDs). Treatment is heterogeneous and can require inpatient admission to an observation unit (OU). Vancomycin is commonly used in the OU for treatment, but increasing MRSA resistance to vancomycin suggests the need for alternatives. Daptomycin is an alternative but it is not known how it compares with vancomycin.
OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that daptomycin is noninferior to vancomycin for the treatment of cSSSI in an OU, using a relative risk (RR) of 1.3 as the noninferiority limit.
METHODS: Subjects admitted to an ED-based OU with a diagnosis of cSSSI were eligible. Consenting subjects were randomized 1:1 to intravenous (i.v.) vancomycin at 15 mg/kg dosing every 12 h or i.v. daptomycin at 4 mg/kg once. Subjects were followed until they met objective criteria for discharge home or hospital admission. Discharged patients were prescribed 10-14 days of oral cephalexin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or clindamycin if allergic to either of these medications. The primary endpoint was meeting objective discharge criteria with no change in antibiotic therapy or return to the ED for the same cellulitis within 30 days of OU discharge.
RESULTS: There were 100 patients enrolled. RR for satisfying the endpoint was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.58-1.98) for daptomycin compared with vancomycin. Hospital admission rates were 36% and 32% for daptomycin and vancomycin treatment, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Daptomycin was not inferior to vancomycin in the treatment of cSSSI in an OU.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ED observation unit; cellulitis; daptomycin; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433431     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  4 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of daptomycin for skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Zhi Mao; Mengmeng Yang; Hongjun Kang; Hui Liu; Liang Pan; Jie Hu; Jun Luo; Feihu Zhou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 2.  Current Treatment Options for Acute Skin and Skin-structure Infections.

Authors:  Yoav Golan
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Efficacy and safety of optional parenteral antimicrobial therapy for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huijuan Li; Xueyan Liang; Guangyan Mo; Sitong Guo; Xiaoyu Chen; Yan Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin, Linezolid, Tedizolid, and Daptomycin in Treating Patients with Suspected or Proven Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jingjuan Feng; Feng Xiang; Jian Cheng; Yeli Gou; Jun Li
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-06-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.