Literature DB >> 26433171

Mortality rate of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with a FIGO score of ≥13.

Pierre-Adrien Bolze1, Cécilia Riedl2, Jérôme Massardier3, Jean-Pierre Lotz4, Benoit You5, Anne-Marie Schott6, Touria Hajri7, François Golfier8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic diseases include premalignant (partial and complete hydatidiform moles) and malignant entities referred to as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Use of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics prognostic score is encouraged in cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia to predict the potential for the development of resistance to single-agent chemotherapy. An International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score of ≥7 defines a high-risk patient and requires combination chemotherapy. Appropriate and rapid diagnosis, treatment by specialized centers, and reduction of early deaths at the time of chemotherapy initiation have led to significant improvements in survival for patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. There is a crucial need for the early identification of high-risk patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia who have an increased death risk to organize their treatment in highly specialized centers.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia that have resulted in death, particularly in a subgroup with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics prognostic score of ≥13, for whom low-dose etoposide and cisplatin induction chemotherapy recently was shown to reduce early death rate. STUDY
DESIGN: We identified 974 patients from the French Center for Trophoblastic Diseases who had a diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia from November 1999 to March 2014. Among 140 patients who were at high risk of resistance to single-agent chemotherapy (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score, ≥7), 29 patients (21%) had a score of ≥13. Mortality rate was estimated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: The 5-year overall mortality rate, after the exclusion of placental site trophoblastic tumors and epithelioid trophoblastic tumors, was 2% for patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.13%). High-risk patients had a 5-year mortality rate of 12% (95% confidence interval, 7.49-18.9%). Patients with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score of ≥13 had a higher 5-year mortality rate (38.4%; 95% confidence interval, 23.4-58.6%) and accounted for 52% of the deaths in the entire cohort. Early deaths, defined as those that occur within 4 weeks after treatment initiation, occurred in 8 patients of the entire cohort. Six of them had an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score of ≥13 at presentation, of whom 5 patients had brain and/or liver metastases.
CONCLUSION: Gestational trophoblastic diseases with an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score of ≥13 have an increased risk of early death. We suggest that an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics score of ≥13 becomes a consensual criterion for prediction of patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with increased risk of death, particularly early death. These patients justify treatment in highly specialized gestational trophoblastic disease centers and may benefit from the use of induction low-dose etoposide and cisplatin.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FIGO score; gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; high risk; induction etoposide and cisplatin; mortality rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26433171     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update.

Authors:  Hextan Y S Ngan; Michael J Seckl; Ross S Berkowitz; Yang Xiang; François Golfier; Paradan K Sekharan; John R Lurain; Leon Massuger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

2.  Circulating Tumor DNA: A Potential Novel Diagnostic Approach in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Pierre-Adrien Bolze; Rima Slim
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Factors Predicting Severe Myelosuppression and Its Influence on Fertility in Patients with Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Receiving Single-Agent Methotrexate Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tu; Ruizhe Chen; Baohua Li; Genping Huang; Nanjia Lu; Qin Chen; Xiaoxia Bai
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Emergency craniotomy in patient with intracranial metastatic choriocarcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Tian-Jiao Zhang; Zhen Shen; Min Li; Jing Zhu; Yue-Bo Li; Wei Wei; Hang-Cheng Zhou; Wei-Dong Zhao; Da-Bao Wu; Ying Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  DPP4 Regulates DHCR24-Mediated Cholesterol Biosynthesis to Promote Methotrexate Resistance in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplastic Cells.

Authors:  Weijie Yuan; Wenjing Yong; Jing Zhu; Dazun Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Role of Emergency Surgery for Fatal Complications of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Peilin Han; Xiaoxu Zhu; Jun Ying; Jianhua Qian
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 7.  Role of NLRP7 in Normal and Malignant Trophoblast Cells.

Authors:  Roland Abi Nahed; Maya Elkhoury Mikhael; Deborah Reynaud; Constance Collet; Nicolas Lemaitre; Thierry Michy; Pascale Hoffmann; Frederic Sergent; Christel Marquette; Padma Murthi; Tiphaine Raia-Barjat; Nadia Alfaidy; Mohamed Benharouga
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-01-24

8.  Predictors of chemotherapy resistance & relapse in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

Authors:  Seema Singhal; Lalit Kumar; Sunesh Kumar; Sachin Khurana; Neerja Bhatla
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.375

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.