Literature DB >> 26432965

Impact of remote monitoring and supervision on resident training using new ACGME milestone criteria.

Ilan J Safir1, Adam B Shrewsberry, Isabella M Issa, Kenneth Ogan, Chad W M Ritenour, Jerry Sullivan, Muta M Issa.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to determine the impact of remote monitoring and supervision (RMS) in integrated endourology suites (IES) on residents achieving endoscopic training milestones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one urology residents evaluated RMS in IES using a 25-question survey. IES provided audio-visual communication for faculty to supervise residents remotely. Questionnaire used a linear visual scale of 1-10 to assess acceptability (8 questions), impact on training (10 questions), supervision level (1 question), and pre- and post-training milestone self-assessments (6 questions). Improvements in Patient Care Milestone #7 (upper/lower tract endoscopic procedures) and Patient Care Milestone #9 (office-based procedures) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-one urology residents (out of potential 23) evaluated RMS in IES using a 25-question survey (91.3% response rate). Overall RMS acceptability and satisfaction was high (mean score = 9.1/10) with a majority (95.2%) feeling comfortable being alone with the patient. Residents reported positively on the following parameters: autonomy without compromising safety (8.7), supervision level (8.6), achieving independence (8.4), education quality (8.3), learning rate (8.1), clinical decision-making (8.0), and reducing case numbers to achieve proficiency (7.6). Residents perceived no issues with under- or over-supervision, and a majority (76.2%) expressed that RMS should be standard of training in residency programs. Residents reported mean level increases of 2.5 and 2.8 (out of 5) in Patient Care Milestones for endoscopic procedures and office-based procedures, respectively (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: RMS in integrated endourology suites may enhance resident education and endoscopic training. The study demonstrated an increase in competency levels reported by residents trained using RMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26432965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  6 in total

1.  Is remote live urologic surgery a reality? Evidences from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Domenico Veneziano; A Tafuri; J Gomez Rivas; A Dourado; Z Okhunov; B K Somani; N Marino; G Fuchs; G Cacciamani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Current use of telehealth in urology: a review.

Authors:  Peris Castaneda; Chad Ellimoottil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  A Smarter Health through the Internet of Surgical Things.

Authors:  Francesk Mulita; Georgios-Ioannis Verras; Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos; Konstantinos Kotis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  A Systematic Review of the Use of Google Glass in Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Joseph F Carrera; Connor C Wang; William Clark; Andrew M Southerland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

5.  Supervision and autonomy of ophthalmology residents in the outpatient Clinic in the United States: a survey of ACGME-accredited programs.

Authors:  Eric L Singman; Divya Srikumaran; Laura Green; Jing Tian; Peter McDonnell
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Evaluation of the urology residency training program in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdulkareem Alkhamees; Sulaiman A Almutairi; Ahmed M Aljuhayman; Hammam Alkanhal; Saad H Alenezi; Mana Almuhaideb; Sultan S Alkhateeb
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-06-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.