| Literature DB >> 26432888 |
Itsuko Nihonmatsu1, Noriaki Ohkawa2, Yoshito Saitoh2, Kaoru Inokuchi3.
Abstract
Late phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP) in the hippocampus is believed to be the cellular basis of long-term memory. Protein synthesis is required for persistent forms of synaptic plasticity, including L-LTP. Neural activity is thought to enhance local protein synthesis in dendrites, and one of the mechanisms required to induce or maintain the long-lasting synaptic plasticity is protein translation in the dendrites. One regulator of translational processes is ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6), a component of the small 40S ribosomal subunit. Although polyribosomes containing rpS6 are observed in dendritic spines, it remains unclear whether L-LTP induction triggers selective targeting of the translational machinery to activated synapses in vivo. Therefore, we investigated synaptic targeting of the translational machinery by observing rpS6 immunoreactivity during high frequency stimulation (HFS) for L-LTP induction in vivo. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis revealed a selective but transient increase in rpS6 immunoreactivity occurring as early as 15 min after the onset of HFS in dendritic spine heads at synaptic sites receiving HFS. Concurrently, levels of the rpS6 protein rapidly declined in somata of granule cells, as determined using immunofluorescence microscopy. These results suggest that the translational machinery is rapidly targeted to activated spines and that this targeting mechanism may contribute to the establishment of L-LTP.Entities:
Keywords: Dendritic spine; Hippocampus; Local protein synthesis; Long-term potentiation (LTP); Ribosomal protein S6
Year: 2015 PMID: 26432888 PMCID: PMC4728348 DOI: 10.1242/bio.013243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Open ISSN: 2046-6390 Impact factor: 2.422
Fig. 1.High frequency stimulation (HFS)-induced L-LTP potentiates spike amplitude and field EPSP slope in the dentate gyrus. (A) Experimental schedule for this study. Sampling was performed after transcardial perfusion of paraformaldehyde. The perfusion began 15, 20 or 35 min after the start of HFS (10 min). (B-E) Data obtained at 20 min (B,C) and 35 min (D,E) under HFS conditions. (B,D) Typical waveforms pre- and post-HFS are indicated by black and red arrowheads, respectively. (C,E) Relative changes in population spike amplitude (SP) and field EPSP slope (SL) after HFS. Data from each condition were obtained from three animals. Data shown as mean±s.e.m.
Fig. 2.Expression of F-actin after L-LTP-inducing high frequency stimulation (HFS) in the dentate gyrus. (A) Micrographs showing phalloidin-rhodamine staining of F-actin in the dentate gyrus. Left panels, control hemisphere; right panels, HFS hemisphere. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B) F-actin staining is selectively increased in laminae that received HFS (middle/outer molecular layers, MML/OML). Graphs show the average intensity of F-actin in the lower blade of the dentate gyrus. Data from each time point were obtained from three animals. Error bars indicate mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01 versus inner molecular layer (IML) using Student's t-test.
Fig. 3.Ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) immunofluorescence and F-actin staining distribution after high frequency stimulation (HFS). (A,C) Micrographs of rpS6 immunostaining, F-actin staining with phalloidin-rhodamine, and DAPI nuclear staining in the dentate gyrus, obtained from 15 min (A) and 35 min (C) under HFS conditions. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B,D) Graphs show average signal intensity of rpS6 in the granule cell layer (GCL). Data obtained from 15 min (B) and 35 min (D) under HFS conditions. Error bars indicate mean±s.e.m. The P value from Student's t-test is shown in panel B.
Fig. 4.Immunoelectron microscopic observation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) distribution after high frequency stimulation (HFS). Immunohistochemistry was performed with hippocampal dentate gyrus sections from the contralateral hemisphere and the ipsilateral hemisphere of HFS 15 min, 20 min, or 35 min condition. Micrographs of inner molecular layer (IML) (left panels) and middle/outer molecular layers (MML/OML) (right panels) are shown. Nanogold particles indicate rpS6 signals. Spines containing postsynaptic densities are blue. Scale bar: 0.5 µm.
Fig. 5.Ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) is selectively and transiently distributed to spines after HFS. (A,B) Graphs of the average number of nanogold particles within each spine of each animal are shown. Data obtained from the inner molecular layer (IML) (A) and middle/outer molecular layers (MML/OML) (B). Error bars indicate mean±s.e.m. P values from Scheffé's post hoc test are shown in panel B. (C,D) Histograms indicate percentage of spines that contain each number of nanogold particles. Average data for each condition were obtained from each animal. (A-D) The number of nanogold particles present in each spine was quantified. Control: IML, n=292, 374, and 130 spines from n=8, 9, and 4 images, respectively; MML and OML, n=912, 765, and 597 spines from n=25, 24, and 13 images, respectively. HFS 15 min: IML, n=273, 79, and 128 spines from n=9, 3, and 5 images, respectively; MML and OML, n=843, 295, and 170 spines from n=24, 9, and 6 images, respectively. HFS 35 min: IML, n=152, 82, and 48 spines from n=4, 3, and 4 images, respectively; MML and OML, n=484, 252, and 69 spines from n=13, 10, and 8 images, respectively. n=3 animals for each condition. Error bars indicate mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control using Student's t-tests.