Literature DB >> 26432817

Has NHS reorganisation saved lives? A CuSum study using 65 years of data.

Alice S Lale1, Jonathan M F Temple2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if NHS reforms affect population mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective study using routinely published data. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Resident population of England and Wales 1948 to 2012 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All cause age sex directly standardised mortality England and Wales 1948 to 2012.
METHODS: Using the CuSum technique and Change-Point Analysis to identify sustained changes in the improving age-standardised mortality rates for the period 1948-2012, and comparing the time of these changes with periods of NHS reform. Where observed changes did not fit with NHS reform, changes external to the NHS were sought as a possible explanation of changes observed.
RESULTS: CuSum plotting and CPA showed no significant changes in female mortality trend between 1948 and 2012. However, this analysis identified a sustained improvement in the male mortality trend, occurring in the mid-1970s. A further change in the rate of male mortality decline was found around the Millennium.
CONCLUSION: The 1974 NHS reorganisation, changing service arrangements predominantly for women and children, is considered an unlikely explanation of the improved rate of male mortality decline. Thus, centrally led NHS reorganisation has never had any detectable effect on either male or female mortality and must be considered ineffective for this purpose. But some evidence supporting the view that increased funding improves outcomes is found. © The Royal Society of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care reform; mortality; statistical process control; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26432817      PMCID: PMC4724772          DOI: 10.1177/0141076815608853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  The role of medical care in contributing to health improvements within societies.

Authors:  J P Bunker
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The application of statistical process control charts to the detection and monitoring of hospital-acquired infections.

Authors:  A P Morton; M Whitby; M L McLaws; A Dobson; S McElwain; D Looke; J Stackelroth; A Sartor
Journal:  J Qual Clin Pract       Date:  2001-12

3.  Measuring the health of nations: updating an earlier analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Nolte; C Martin McKee
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  How do we evaluate the impact of the health reforms on the NHS?

Authors:  Zosia Kmietowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-08-21

5.  Audit commission defines NHS management costs.

Authors:  J Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

6.  A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries.

Authors:  S Tuljapurkar; N Li; C Boe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do health reforms work?

Authors:  Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A better future for the NHS.

Authors:  Richard Spicer
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A case for revisiting peer review: Implications for professional self-regulation and quality improvement.

Authors:  Terry E Hill; Peter F Martelli; Julie H Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Exploring the impacts of the 2012 Health and Social Care Act reforms to commissioning on clinical activity in the English NHS: a mixed methods study of cervical screening.

Authors:  Jonathan Hammond; Thomas Mason; Matt Sutton; Alex Hall; Nicholas Mays; Anna Coleman; Pauline Allen; Lynsey Warwick-Giles; Kath Checkland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.