Literature DB >> 26432596

Histological features of oral epithelium in seven animal species: As a reference for selecting animal models.

Guoliang Sa1, Xuepeng Xiong2, Tianfu Wu3, Jincheng Yang1, Sangang He4, Yifang Zhao3.   

Abstract

Several animals have been used as models for basic and clinical research on oral mucosa. Few studies have focused on the selection of an appropriate animal model. This study aimed to provide histological references for selecting a potential model. Histological features were assessed by exploring 6 morphological characteristics and 2 immunohistochemical markers. The morphological characteristics included keratinization, basal membrane appearance, epithelial thickness, rete ridge length, adjacent rete ridge distance, and regional variation; the immunohistochemical markers included Ki67 (a proliferative marker) and Cytokeratin 19 (CK19; a stemness marker). The histological similarity of each species compared to humans was calculated according to the designated scoring criteria. The results showed that the buccal mucosae from dog and pig were non-keratinized, with similar rete ridge length and distance, compared to that of humans. The dog, rat, and cavy mucosae had analogous gross appearances in the basal membrane. The dog oral mucosae shared similar epithelial thickness with human oral mucosae. Compared to the human mucosa, the dog, pig, rat, and rabbit mucosae exhibited corresponding regional variations. The Ki67-positive cells in human and canine mucosae were predominantly localized in the suprabasal layers, whereas most of the proliferative cells were in the basal layer in other species. CK19 immunoreactivities were detected only in human and canine mucosae. The canine mucosae gained the highest point value (14), whereas the scores for the pig, rat, rabbit, cavy, sheep, and buffalo mucosae were 8, 6, 5, 5, 5, and 2, respectively. The histological variations in the oral epithelium of diverse animal species are considerable; the mucosae from dogs are most similar to human mucosae, implicating its histological basis as an animal model.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Histological features; Oral epithelium; Oral mucosal drug delivery; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26432596     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  8 in total

1.  Therapeutic Intervention Using a Smad7-Based Tat Protein to Treat Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis.

Authors:  Mary-Keara Boss; Yao Ke; Li Bian; Lauren G Harrison; Ber-In Lee; Amber Prebble; Tiffany Martin; Erin Trageser; Spencer Hall; Donna D Wang; Suyan Wang; Lyndah Chow; Barry Holwerda; David Raben; Daniel Regan; Sana D Karam; Steven Dow; Christian D Young; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A method for evaluating drug penetration and absorption through isolated buccal mucosa with highly accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  Shuangqing Wang; Lei Liu; Saige Meng; Yuling Wang; Daofeng Liu; Zhonggao Gao; Along Zuo; Jianpeng Guo
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.671

3.  Assessment of a developed pig cadaver model for teaching crown lengthening surgical procedures.

Authors:  Jinsheng Zhong; Dong Shi; Cui Wang; Min Zhen; Yiping Wei; Ziyao Han; Wenjie Hu; Kwok-Hung Chung
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Chemical Regeneration of Wound Defects: Relevance to the Canine Palatal Mucosa and Cell Cycle Up-Regulation in Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Kyungho Lee; Heithem Ben Amara; Sang Cheon Lee; Richard Leesungbok; Min Ah Chung; Ki-Tae Koo; Suk Won Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Evaluation of an ex vivo porcine model to investigate the effect of low abrasive airpolishing.

Authors:  Gregor Petersilka; Ralph Heckel; Raphael Koch; Benjamin Ehmke; Nicole Arweiler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  In vitro three-dimensional organotypic culture models of the oral mucosa.

Authors:  Mitchell Klausner; Yuki Handa; Seiya Aizawa
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  GMP compliant isolation of mucosal epithelial cells and fibroblasts from biopsy samples for clinical tissue engineering.

Authors:  Angela Tait; Toby Proctor; Nick J I Hamilton; Martin A Birchall; Mark W Lowdell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells Grown on Porous Silicon Membrane for Transfer to the Rat Eye.

Authors:  Yazad D Irani; Sonja Klebe; Steven J P McInnes; Marek Jasieniak; Nicolas H Voelcker; Keryn A Williams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.